Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Baldwin Elementary School in Austin, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 93
Address
 12200 MERIDIAN PARK BLVD
Austin, TX 78739
Telephone
(512) 841-8900
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
93
Students
787
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
49.0
Free lunch eligible students
89
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
14
School district
AUSTIN ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CLAYTON EL (1.1 miles):

99
GORZYCKI MIDDLE (2.8 miles):

99
MILLS EL (3.2 miles):

99
KIKER EL (2.5 miles):

98
BARANOFF EL (4.7 miles):

95
ROOSTER SPRINGS EL (3.7 miles):

93
BOWIE H S (3.8 miles):

93
Baldwin Elementary School:

93
BAILEY M S (3.3 miles):

79
Baldwin Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Travis County:

57
Austin:

57
Baldwin Elementary School:

93

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 787
Enrollment in 2015: 742
Enrollment in 2014: 746
Enrollment in 2013: 726
Enrollment in 2012: 653
Enrollment in 2011: 512

Baldwin Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students54111107130139117129787
Female students28604866695263386
Male students26515964706566401
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - 1 - 12
Asian students6848811954
Hispanic students20243236322340207
Black students - 12 - 2117
White students26726475897871475
Two or More Races students2651174742

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 54
Kindergarten enrollment: 111
1st grade enrollment: 107
2nd grade enrollment: 130
3rd grade enrollment: 139
4th grade enrollment: 117
5th grade enrollment: 129

Baldwin Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 386 (49.0%)
Baldwin Elementary School:

49.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 401 (51.0%)
Here:

51.0%
Texas:

50.1%

Baldwin Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.3%)
Here:

0.3%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 54 (6.9%)
Here:

6.9%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 207 (26.3%)
School:

26.3%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 7 (0.9%)
Here:

0.9%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 475 (60.4%)
School:

60.4%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 42 (5.3%)
Baldwin Elementary School:

5.3%
State:

2.1%

Baldwin Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 103 (13.1%)
School:

13.1%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 89 (11.3%)
Here:

11.3%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 14 (1.8%)
Baldwin Elementary School:

1.8%
Texas:

6.2%

Baldwin Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 49

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1.6
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4.7
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 19.1
Number of FTE nurses: 0.5

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

16.0
Texas:

15.6

Baldwin Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,853,031
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 48 (Salary Expenditures: $2,374,995)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $80,907)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 9.3 (Salary Expenditures: $313,973)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $83,156)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $217,664
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,027,723
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,427,615
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $122,216)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 15.6 (Salary Expenditures: $393,270)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $84,623)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $305,889

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic52
  • Asian19
  • Black2
  • White7
  • IDEA13
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 80 (male: 39, female: 41)
  • Hispanic: 52 (male: 26, female: 26)
  • Asian: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic29
  • Asian7
  • White41
  • LEP14
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 77 (male: 57, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 29 (male: 22, female: 7)
  • Asian: 7 (all male)
  • White: 41 (male: 28, female: 13)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 14 (male: 7, female: 7)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic7
  • Black2
  • White31
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 42 (male: 25, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 31 (male: 23, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

1.8%
Texas:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Here:

1.5%
State:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian13
  • Black2
  • White40
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 67 (male: 38, female: 29)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Asian: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 40 (male: 23, female: 17)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Baldwin Elementary School:

85.1
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,520
  • Males1,510
  • Females1,532
  • Hispanic1,474
  • Asian1,556
  • White1,532
Math Average Scale Score:

1,520
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 115
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 115

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.3 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

15%
23%
35%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 22%)
21%
20%
37%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,532, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 33%)
8%
27%
32%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,474, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 21%)
24%
24%
31%
21%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
29%
14%
14%
43%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,532, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 27%)
10%
23%
40%
27%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,493
  • Males1,467
  • Females1,526
  • Hispanic1,451
  • Asian1,529
  • White1,511
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,493
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 115
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 115

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 37%

10%
28%
25%
37%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 24%)
14%
35%
27%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 52%)
6%
19%
23%
52%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,451, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 27%)
24%
28%
21%
27%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,529, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
43%
14%
43%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,511, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 41%)
6%
24%
29%
41%

3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,635
  • Males1,638
  • Females1,632
  • Hispanic1,560
  • Asian1,810
  • White1,643
  • Multirace1,631
Math Average Scale Score:

1,635
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 136
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 136

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.7 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 38%

13%
23%
26%
38%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 39%)
16%
18%
27%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 74, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 36%)
11%
27%
26%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 17%)
20%
34%
29%
17%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,810, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 77%)
8%
15%
77%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 38%)
12%
20%
30%
38%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 45%)
9%
27%
19%
45%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,604
  • Males1,595
  • Females1,612
  • Hispanic1,528
  • Asian1,688
  • White1,627
  • Multirace1,593
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,604
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 136
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 136

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 44%

10%
19%
27%
44%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,595, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 40%)
10%
24%
26%
40%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 74, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 47%)
9%
17%
27%
47%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 26%)
23%
28%
23%
26%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 77%)
8%
15%
77%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 47%)
7%
18%
28%
47%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 45%)
27%
28%
45%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,153
  • Males4,029
  • Females4,258
  • Hispanic3,867
  • Asian4,681
  • White4,191
  • Multirace4,202
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,153
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 135
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 136

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.6 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 12%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

20%
12%
43%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,029, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 19%)
26%
11%
44%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,258, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 30%)
15%
12%
43%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,867, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 15%)
29%
15%
41%
15%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,681, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 62%)
8%
30%
62%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,191, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 23%)
21%
11%
45%
23%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,202, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 27%)
9%
18%
46%
27%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,700
  • Males1,700
  • Females1,699
  • Hispanic1,653
  • Asian1,836
  • White1,708
  • Multirace1,655
Math Average Scale Score:

1,700
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 148
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 148

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 47%

5%
21%
27%
47%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,700, Tested: 78, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 46%)
8%
15%
31%
46%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,699, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 49%)
3%
27%
21%
49%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,653, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 35%)
9%
35%
21%
35%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,836, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,708, Tested: 91, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 45%)
3%
18%
34%
45%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 63%)
25%
12%
63%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,676
  • Males1,663
  • Females1,691
  • Hispanic1,625
  • Asian1,827
  • White1,687
  • Multirace1,612
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,676
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 148
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 148

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.3 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.1 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 55%

6%
14%
25%
55%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,663, Tested: 78, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 59%)
12%
9%
20%
59%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,691, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 50%)
19%
31%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,625, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 38%)
6%
29%
27%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,827, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,687, Tested: 91, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 57%)
5%
9%
29%
57%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 63%)
25%
12%
63%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,938
  • Males3,929
  • Females3,948
  • Hispanic3,715
  • Asian4,367
  • White4,008
  • Multirace3,683
Science Average Scale Score:

3,938
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 147
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 147

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.7 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

16%
34%
32%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,929, Tested: 78, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 17%)
17%
29%
37%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,948, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 20%)
14%
41%
25%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,715, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 6%)
26%
50%
18%
6%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,367, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 40%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,008, Tested: 90, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 21%)
12%
31%
36%
21%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,683, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
38%
13%
25%
25%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)

Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Baldwin Elementary School:

2.5
Texas:

17.4


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian2
  • White13
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
  • IDEA2
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 24 (male: 12, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Baldwin Elementary School:

30.5
Texas:

147.9

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Austin, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2019 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents