|
Back to: Litchfield Park, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45.
Address: 5340 N. wigwam Creek Blvd
Litchfield Park, WI 85340
Schedule: 07:30 AM to 03:30 PM
Principal: Ms. Melissa Wisner
Phone (verify before calling): (623) 547-1400
Fax: (623) 547-1947
Homepage: www.lesd.k12.az.us/robey/Robeyhome.ht
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 4
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 100% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Enrollment In 2005: 405
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 91.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2007: 46.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 15.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 3
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 92
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 22.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 879 schools: | 11.34% |
Female Tested: 44
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 660 schools: | 9.08% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 14.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Male Tested: 48
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 13.29% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 58.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 10.42% |
Hispanic Tested: 28
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 15.70% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 31.93% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 49.26% |
White Tested: 38
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 18.0% | | State average from 680 schools: | 14.66% |
White Meets Standards:
| This school: | 63.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 63.77% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 648 schools: | 18.65% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 82
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 4.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 871 schools: | 12.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 49
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 43
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 591 schools: | 6.46% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 770 schools: | 16.24% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 60.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 62.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 17.79% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 14.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 14.09% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 533 schools: | 5.32% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 600 schools: | 5.24% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 92
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Female Tested: 44
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 19.32% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 68.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 18.74% |
Male Tested: 48
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 830 schools: | 19.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 28
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 4.0% | | State average from 607 schools: | 15.23% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 24.80% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 52.65% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 9.55% |
White Tested: 38
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 672 schools: | 11.25% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 55.48% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 29.35% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 82
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 4.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 8.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 68.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 49
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 8.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 43
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 619 schools: | 7.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 757 schools: | 12.62% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 60.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 54.52% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 28.11% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 91
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 58.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Female Tested: 44
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 5.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 8.85% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 22.65% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 60.68% |
Male Tested: 47
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 11.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 13.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 55.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Hispanic Tested: 35
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 15.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 695 schools: | 33.01% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.02% |
White Tested: 30
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 3.0% | | State average from 482 schools: | 5.24% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 14.21% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 691 schools: | 67.15% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 85
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 7.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 61.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 49
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 42
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 586 schools: | 6.04% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 15.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 65.54% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 9.55% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 720 schools: | 11.56% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 635 schools: | 15.35% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 826 schools: | 10.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 4.13% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 14.86% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 91
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 56.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 5: | 14.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 19.39% |
Female Tested: 44
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 9.0% | | State average from 749 schools: | 12.44% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 851 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 50.29% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.44% |
Male Tested: 47
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 19.30% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 20.50% |
Hispanic Tested: 35
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 19.20% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 25.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 46.24% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 611 schools: | 10.53% |
White Tested: 30
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 579 schools: | 6.97% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 13.14% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 52.41% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 29.07% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 85
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 9.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 5: | 14.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 21.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 49
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 9.85% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 42
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 12.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 7.86% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 14.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 782 schools: | 51.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 734 schools: | 28.54% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 105
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 829 schools: | 9.06% |
Female Tested: 51
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 10.36% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 845 schools: | 22.62% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 865 schools: | 59.58% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 10.99% |
Male Tested: 54
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 25.46% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 54.33% |
Hispanic Tested: 37
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 608 schools: | 18.28% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 32.79% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 47.06% |
White Tested: 45
White Percent Tested: 98%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 14.35% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 67.26% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 13
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 459 schools: | 52.95% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 32.01% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 92
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 739 schools: | 9.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 66.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 9.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 52
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 17.58% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 723 schools: | 32.68% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 47.45% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 53
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 15.84% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 776 schools: | 65.70% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 14.06% |
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 14.58% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 8.92% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 4: | 3.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 4.37% |
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 5.71% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 14.58% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 4: | 9.0% | | State average from 609 schools: | 6.65% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 105
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 24.20% |
Female Tested: 51
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 707 schools: | 11.07% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 17.42% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 49.82% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 24.72% |
Male Tested: 54
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 4: | 17.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 12.66% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 4: | 15.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 17.13% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 48.00% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 831 schools: | 24.74% |
Hispanic Tested: 37
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.71% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 677 schools: | 23.03% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 48.80% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 14.15% |
White Tested: 45
White Percent Tested: 98%
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 540 schools: | 6.33% |
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 10.61% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.48% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 35.57% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 13
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 425 schools: | 35.38% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 15.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 26.31% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 32.88% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 92
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 8.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 26.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 52
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 662 schools: | 15.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 23.16% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 54.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 48.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 13.53% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 53
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 617 schools: | 7.06% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 736 schools: | 11.47% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 48.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 752 schools: | 34.56% |
|