Bayonet Point Middle School in New Port Richey, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 49.

11125 LITTLE RD
New Port Richey, FL 34654

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Juvenile Detention Center School (19.6 miles):

86
East Lake High School (13.5 miles):

74
Charles S. Rushe Middle School (11.0 miles):

66
Dayspring Academy School (0.4 miles):

58
Davidsen Middle School (19.0 miles):

51
Bayonet Point Middle School:

49
Fox Chapel Middle School (14.5 miles):

43
Hudson Middle School (3.6 miles):

25
Ewes-Eckerd Youth Challenge School (19.7 miles):

1
Bayonet Point Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pasco County:

43
New Port Richey:

44
Bayonet Point Middle School:

49

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 774-7400 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 51
School number: 342
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PASCO
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 774-7491
Principal: Stephen Knobl
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 46
Senate District: 11
School Web Address: WWW.PASCO.K12.FL.US

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

73%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

608
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 1

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 768 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 770 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 251
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 743
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 672

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 745
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 674
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 602 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 604 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 194
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 587
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 532

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 589
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 534
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

88%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

621
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 1


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 795 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 792 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 273
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 767
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 728

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 764
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 725
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 654 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 652 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 219
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 632
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 601

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 630
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 599
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 220 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 196
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

60%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

578
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 817 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 816 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 254
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 773
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 714

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 772
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 712
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 687 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 686 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 652
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 599

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 651
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 598
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 188 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

62%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

529
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

60%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 954 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 954 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 316
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 895
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 893
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 798 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 798 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 257
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 755
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 753
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 574 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 575 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 194
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 536
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 536
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 193 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

419
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

18%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 970 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 967 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 305
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 909
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 905
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 799 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 796 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 249

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 754
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 750
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 626 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 626 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 202
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 581
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 580
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 207 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 66
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 191
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 189
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

76%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

384
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1575
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

45%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1749
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1796
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

83%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1665
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1781
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1858
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

46%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1630
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

371
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

31%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

94%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1674
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

350
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

25%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1750
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1604
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1763
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1876
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

64%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

347
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1722
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1766
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1666
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1596
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1654
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1628
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1770
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

301
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1869
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

314
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 279
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 322
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1540
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1678
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1753
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1854
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1566
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

358
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1643
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1724
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1630
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1790
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1880
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

300
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

648
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

267
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

78
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

251
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

81
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

313
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

359
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

679
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

65
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

265
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

688
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

65
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 268
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

308
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 65%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 263
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

287
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1628
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1638
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1557
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 80

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1771
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1778
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1669
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 109

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1837
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1848
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1750
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 99

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

298
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1607
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

294
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1615
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1567
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 48

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1778
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1792
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1650
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 142

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1854
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1863
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1750
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 112

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 356
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 259
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 331
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 356
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 259
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 332
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 328
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
BAYONET POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL:

285
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 84%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2020 Advameg, Inc.