
Back to: Lake Wales, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 53.
13895 HWY 27
Lake Wales, FL 33859
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bok Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Polk County:  41  Lake Wales:  37  Bok Academy School:  53 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Phone: (863) 6381010 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1601
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: POLK
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 6381212
Principal: Donna Dunson
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 66
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://edisonpark.dadeschools.net
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  74%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  73%  State average from 612 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  88%  State average from 613 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  51%  State average from 612 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  69%  State average from 613 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsBOK ACADEMY:  75%  State average from 612 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  70%  State average from 613 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  67%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  567  State average from 613 schools:  545 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  58%  State average from 614 schools:  56% 
Minority RateHere:  36%  State average from 614 schools:  49% 
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 533 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 531 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 516
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 496
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 493
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 339 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 337 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientBOK ACADEMY:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 329
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 318
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 327
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 316
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 88
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 309 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 291
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 299
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 288
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 22
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  72%  State average from 613 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  65%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 613 schools:  92% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  25%  State average from 613 schools:  49% 
Making Reading Gains BOK ACADEMY:  66%  State average from 613 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  68%  State average from 613 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  79%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  63%  State average from 613 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  531  State average from 613 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  61%  State average from 613 schools:  52% 
Minority RateHere:  37%  State average from 613 schools:  48% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 368 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 368 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 334
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 308
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 335
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 308
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 231 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 184
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 184
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 192
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 193
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingBOK ACADEMY:  89%  State average from 603 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  88%  State average from 603 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  92%  State average from 603 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  61%  State average from 602 schools:  46% 
Making Reading Gains BOK ACADEMY:  75%  State average from 602 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  72%  State average from 602 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  64%  State average from 602 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  70%  State average from 602 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  611  State average from 602 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 604 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  38%  State average from 605 schools:  49% 
Minority RateHere:  52%  State average from 605 schools:  48% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 325 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 325 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 106
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 299
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 300
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 151
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 151
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 114
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 114
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 114
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 115
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 66
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientBOK ACADEMY:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 74
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  55%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  49%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingBOK ACADEMY:  74%  State average from 539 schools:  91% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  25%  State average from 538 schools:  44% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  70%  State average from 539 schools:  61% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsBOK ACADEMY:  57%  State average from 539 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  60%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  70%  State average from 539 schools:  67% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  460  State average from 539 schools:  523 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 539 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  91%  State average from 541 schools:  49% 
Minority RateHere:  99%  State average from 542 schools:  53% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (93%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 168 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (93%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 168 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (94%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (73%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (70%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  54%  State average from 526 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  46%  State average from 526 schools:  63% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  68%  State average from 526 schools:  89% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  54%  State average from 526 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  61%  State average from 526 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  50%  State average from 526 schools:  72% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  333  State average from 526 schools:  425 
Percent TestedHere:  84%  State average from 526 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  92%  State average from 525 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  100%  State average from 526 schools:  52% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (92%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 46
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 149
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 149
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (92%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 44
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 143
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 143
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (92%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 42
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 139
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 139
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (90%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 40
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 40
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (72%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 22
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  42%  State average from 505 schools:  59% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  46%  State average from 505 schools:  60% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  80%  State average from 506 schools:  83% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  53%  State average from 505 schools:  61% 
Making Math GainsHere:  58%  State average from 505 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  30%  State average from 505 schools:  66% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  309  State average from 506 schools:  397 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 506 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: F
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  97%  State average from 506 schools:  51% 
Minority RateHere:  99%  State average from 506 schools:  50% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1466  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  42%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  31%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  84%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17BOK ACADEMY:  18  State average:  17 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1729  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  345  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  27%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  41%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  18%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  86%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1738  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  38%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  83%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1812  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  80%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1873  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  17%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  44%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  22%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  76%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1928  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1BOK ACADEMY:  7%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  35%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  58%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  343  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  47%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  14%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  69%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  35%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  37%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  50%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1601  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500BOK ACADEMY:  365  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  35%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  24%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  90%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOK ACADEMY:  1726  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  362  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  28%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  28%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveBOK ACADEMY:  86%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1787  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  358  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  39%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  83%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12BOK ACADEMY:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7BOK ACADEMY:  8  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6BOK ACADEMY:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1784  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  12%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  23%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  25%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  65%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7BOK ACADEMY:  7  State average:  6 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1897  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  333  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  75%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1967  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  44%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  23%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  16%  State average:  10% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  83%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12BOK ACADEMY:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7BOK ACADEMY:  6  State average:  5 
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOK ACADEMY:  1507  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500BOK ACADEMY:  334  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1720  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  343  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1720  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1736  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1860  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1817  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500BOK ACADEMY:  324  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500BOK ACADEMY:  277  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1596  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  364  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOK ACADEMY:  1693  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  354  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1721  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  344  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOK ACADEMY:  1735  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1851  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1861  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 90
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 92%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 52%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 93%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOK ACADEMY:  1455  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1633  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1751  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500BOK ACADEMY:  328  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1527  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  349  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1636  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  341  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1740  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  348  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  645  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  659  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Median NPRBOK ACADEMY:  75  State average:  69 
Informational (max 18)BOK ACADEMY:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)BOK ACADEMY:  10  State average:  10 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  104  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  680  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)BOK ACADEMY:  7  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 102
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  328  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 89%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1132  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  272  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1376  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1379  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1252  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 128
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1533  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  289  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1551  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1465  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 85
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1298  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1392  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1396  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1309  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 88
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1557  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1572  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1422  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 151
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 53
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  609  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 40
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  625  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48
Mean Scale ScoreBOK ACADEMY:  658  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 53
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  599  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 41
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  623  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 53
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  641  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 55
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 68
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  268  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 69%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 40%
