
Back to: Panama City, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 60.
13410 HWY 77
Panama City, FL 32409
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bozeman School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Bay County:  42  Panama City:  39  Bozeman School:  60 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Phone: (850) 2659887 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 3
School number: 541
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: BAY
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 2655377
Principal: Sandy Harrison
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
Senate District: 2
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  79%  State average from 59 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  72%  State average from 59 schools:  78% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 59 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  53%  State average from 59 schools:  54% 
Making Reading Gains BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  69%  State average from 59 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  71%  State average from 59 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  68%  State average from 59 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  72%  State average from 59 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  577  State average from 59 schools:  560 
Percent TestedBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 59 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  43%  State average from 59 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  48%  State average from 59 schools:  46% 
Region: 2
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1092 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1092 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 362
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1048
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 990
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1047
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 987
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 574 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 574 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 210
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 560
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 534
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 559
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 532
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 72
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 264
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 264
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 37
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 469 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 469 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 442
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 417
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 414
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 126
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 123
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  77%  State average from 58 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  74%  State average from 58 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  95%  State average from 58 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  57%  State average from 58 schools:  50% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  70%  State average from 58 schools:  69% 
Making Math GainsHere:  73%  State average from 58 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  76%  State average from 58 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  68%  State average from 58 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  590  State average from 58 schools:  564 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 59 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  39%  State average from 59 schools:  51% 
Minority RateHere:  47%  State average from 59 schools:  46% 
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1169 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1170 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 391
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1093
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1031
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1092
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1031
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 621 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 622 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 564
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 564
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 70
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 323 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 265
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 266
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 458 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 458 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 155
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 409
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 386
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 407
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 385
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 136
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 136
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  74%  State average from 59 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  74%  State average from 59 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 59 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  58%  State average from 59 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  66%  State average from 59 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  75%  State average from 59 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  68%  State average from 59 schools:  60% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  65%  State average from 59 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  571  State average from 59 schools:  541 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 59 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  36%  State average from 59 schools:  47% 
Minority RateHere:  45%  State average from 59 schools:  46% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1131 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 350
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1068
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 996
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1071
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 997
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 625 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 625 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 187
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 604
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 569
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 606
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 571
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 81
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 271 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 271 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 228
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 250
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 228
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 406 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 406 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 366
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 337
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 336
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 131
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 134
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  65%  State average from 25 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  76%  State average from 25 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  85%  State average from 25 schools:  81% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  39%  State average from 25 schools:  42% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  52%  State average from 25 schools:  59% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math GainsHere:  74%  State average from 25 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  50%  State average from 25 schools:  57% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  73%  State average from 25 schools:  66% 
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  524  State average from 25 schools:  493 
Percent TestedBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 25 schools:  97% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  44%  State average from 25 schools:  55% 
Minority RateHere:  3%  State average from 25 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 823 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 821 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 318
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 783
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 781
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 801 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 799 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 313
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 762
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 760
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 372 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 370 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 137
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  63%  State average from 23 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in MathBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  72%  State average from 23 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  90%  State average from 23 schools:  83% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  60%  State average from 23 schools:  59% 
Making Math GainsHere:  75%  State average from 23 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  60%  State average from 23 schools:  59% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  420  State average from 23 schools:  391 
Percent TestedBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 23 schools:  97% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  49%  State average from 24 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  4%  State average from 24 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 795 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 794 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 306
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 744
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 745
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 770 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 769 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 295
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 723
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 724
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 375 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 375 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 131
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 345
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 346
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 52
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  25%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 136
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  22%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 137
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  60%  State average from 24 schools:  55% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  65%  State average from 24 schools:  56% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 24 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  54%  State average from 24 schools:  56% 
Making Math GainsHere:  67%  State average from 24 schools:  63% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  61%  State average from 24 schools:  54% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  398  State average from 24 schools:  363 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 24 schools:  95% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  57%  State average from 24 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  2%  State average from 24 schools:  41% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1363  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  17%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  14%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  32%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  68%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1580  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  31%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  71%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1642  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  309  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  15%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  26%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1757  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  36%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  28%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1911  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  12%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  31%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  81%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1932  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  13%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  22%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  62%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1968  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  28%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  43%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  11%  State average:  12% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  57%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1941  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  302 
Percent PassingHere:  48%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  39%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  35%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  11%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  25%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  39%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  11%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  46%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  8  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  21%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  47%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1332  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  36%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  24%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  5%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  65%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1555  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  38%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  26%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  71%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1657  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  28%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  21%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  61%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1666  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  26%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  19%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  53%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1845  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  14%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  19%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  25%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  68%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1932  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  12%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  15%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  21%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  17%  State average:  10% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  73%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1933  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  29%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  47%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  14%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  64%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1987  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  85%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  29%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  70%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1379  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1605  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1694  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1789  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1840  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1916  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  316  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1946  State average:  1907 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  236  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1342  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1588  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1695  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1740  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1842  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1920  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1927  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 124
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 86%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 410
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 89%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1364  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1583  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1646  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1742  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1829  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1909  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  315  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1965  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  274  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1347  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1590  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1682  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1717  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1821  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1931  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1954  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  125  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  630  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  8  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  656  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  130  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  672  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  363  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  677  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  392  State average:  201 
Mean Scale ScoreBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  687  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Literary (max 18)BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  14  State average:  14 
Informational (max 18)BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  13  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  14  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  368  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  693  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  14  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  146  State average:  273 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  698  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Initial Understanding (max 12)BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
Critical Analysis (max 12)BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 113
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  299  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 72%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 372
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  302  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 86%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 5
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1462  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1601  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1600  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1479  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 121
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1689  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1684  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1607  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 78
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1732  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1748  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1693  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 55
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1768  State average from 808 schools:  1746 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  305 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1771  State average:  1743 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1794  State average:  1668 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 23
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1872  State average from 819 schools:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  294 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1874  State average:  1807 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1807  State average:  1738 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 67
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1917  State average from 612 schools:  1849 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  298 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1933  State average:  1837 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1889  State average:  1779 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 44
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1924  State average from 573 schools:  1879 
Mean Scale Score 100500BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  300  State average:  291 
Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1939  State average:  1873 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1935  State average:  1876 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 5
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  290 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  295 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1548  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  354  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1582  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1582  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1399  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 183
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1689  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1688  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1551  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 137
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1750  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1764  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1700  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 64
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1795  State average from 804 schools:  1777 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1809  State average:  1774 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1737  State average:  1645 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 72
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1888  State average from 815 schools:  1851 
Mean Scale Score 100500BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  318  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1891  State average:  1845 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1808  State average:  1755 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 83
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1916  State average from 613 schools:  1884 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  290 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1924  State average:  1869 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006BOZEMAN SCHOOL:  1869  State average:  1821 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 55
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1985  State average from 581 schools:  1950 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  315 
Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1994  State average:  1939 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1920  State average:  1901 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 74
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48
Mean Scale ScoreBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  650  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  648  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  680  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 118
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  683  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  679  State average from 796 schools:  675 
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 128
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  690  State average from 810 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 141
Mean Scale ScoreBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  708  State average from 597 schools:  696 
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  697  State average from 575 schools:  695 
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  651  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  657  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  670  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117
Mean Scale ScoreBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  685  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  685  State average from 796 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 128
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  699  State average from 810 schools:  698 
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 141
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  712  State average from 597 schools:  708 
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  712  State average from 575 schools:  710 
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  289  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 13
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 70%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 55%
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 127
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  308  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17  Combined: 10
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedBOZEMAN SCHOOL:  4  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 75%
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 153
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  295  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 78%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 63%
