U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Bozeman School in Panama City, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Panama City, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 60.

13410 HWY 77
Panama City, FL 32409

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bay Haven Charter Academy School (2.0 miles):

88
Mowat Middle School (0.6 miles):

66
Bozeman School:

60
Hutchison Beach Elementary School (11.6 miles):

55
Merriam Cherry Street Elementary School (6.3 miles):

47
Everitt Middle School (5.7 miles):

38
Cedar Grove Elementary School (4.6 miles):

26
Hope School (2.4 miles):

3
Bozeman School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Bay County:

42
Panama City:

39
Bozeman School:

60

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA





Phone: (850) 265-9887 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 3
School number: 541
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: BAY
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 265-5377
Principal: Sandy Harrison
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
Senate District: 2

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 59 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 59 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 59 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

53%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 59 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 59 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

577
State average from 59 schools:

560
Percent Tested
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

43%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1092 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1092 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 362
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1048
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 990

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1047
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 987
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 574 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 574 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 210
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 560
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 534

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 559
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 532
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 469 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 469 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 442
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 414
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 58 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 58 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 58 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 58 schools:

50%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 58 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 58 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

590
State average from 58 schools:

564
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 59 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1169 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1170 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 391
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1093
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1031

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1092
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1031
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 621 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 622 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 564

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 564
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 323 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 265

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 266
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 458 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 458 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 155
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 409
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 386

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 407
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 385
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 59 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 59 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 59 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

58%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 59 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 59 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 59 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 59 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

571
State average from 59 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 59 schools:

46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1131 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 350
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1068
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 996

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1071
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 997
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 625 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 625 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 187
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 604
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 569

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 606
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 571
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 271 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 271 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 250
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 406 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 406 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 366
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 337

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 336
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 25 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 25 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 25 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 25 schools:

42%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 25 schools:

59%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 25 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 25 schools:

57%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 25 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

524
State average from 25 schools:

493
Percent Tested
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 25 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 25 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

3%
State average from 25 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 823 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 821 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 318
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 783
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 781
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 801 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 799 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 313
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 762
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 760
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 372 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 370 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 137
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 23 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 23 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 23 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 23 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 23 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 23 schools:

59%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

420
State average from 23 schools:

391
Percent Tested
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 23 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 24 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 24 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 795 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 794 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 306
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 744
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 745
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 770 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 769 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 295

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 723
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 724
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 375 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 375 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 131

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 345
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 346
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 52
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 137
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 24 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 24 schools:

56%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 24 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 24 schools:

56%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 24 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 24 schools:

54%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

398
State average from 24 schools:

363
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 24 schools:

95%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 24 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

2%
State average from 24 schools:

41%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1363
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

14%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1580
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1642
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

309
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1757
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

28%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1911
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1932
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1968
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1941
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

48%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1332
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1555
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1657
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1666
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

53%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1845
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1932
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

73%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1933
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1987
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

85%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1379
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1605
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1789
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1840
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1916
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

316
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1946
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1342
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1588
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1695
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1740
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1842
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1920
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1927
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 124
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 410
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1364
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1583
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1646
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1829
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1909
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

315
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1965
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1347
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1590
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1682
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1717
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1821
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1931
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1954
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

125
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

630
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

116
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

130
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

363
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

392
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

687
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

368
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

693
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

146
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

698
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 113
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

299
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 372
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

302
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1462
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1601
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1600
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1479
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 121

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1689
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1684
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1607
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 78

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1732
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1748
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1693
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1768
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1771
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1794
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -23

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1872
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1874
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1807
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1917
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1933
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1889
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 44

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1924
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

300
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1939
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1935
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1548
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1582
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1582
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1399
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 183

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1689
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1688
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1551
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 137

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1750
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1764
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1700
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1795
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1809
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1737
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1888
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

318
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1891
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1808
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 83

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1916
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1924
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

1869
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1985
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1994
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1920
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 74

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48
Mean Scale Score
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

650
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56
Mean Scale Score
Here:

648
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 118
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 128
Mean Scale Score
Here:

690
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 141
Mean Scale Score
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

708
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117
Mean Scale Score
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

685
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 128
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 141
Mean Scale Score
Here:

712
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153
Mean Scale Score
Here:

712
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

289
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 70%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 127
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

308
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
BOZEMAN SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 153
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

295
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 78%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

Back to: Panama City, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.