|
Back to: Burlington, VT, Vermont, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Vermont forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2007 test average as compared to other schools in Vermont) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 58.
332 ETHAN ALLEN PARKWAY
Burlington, VT 5401
County: CHITTENDEN
Grade span: Kindergarten - 5th Grade
Phone: (802) 864-8479 (make sure to verify first before calling)
Enrollment in C. P. Smith School
Kindergarten Enrollment : 38
1st Grade Enrollment : 48
2nd Grade Enrollment : 46
3rd Grade Enrollment : 50
4th Grade Enrollment : 51
5th Grade Enrollment : 45
Female Enrollment : 129
Male Enrollment : 137
White Enrollment : 240
Black Enrollment : 17
Hispanic Enrollment : 4
Asian / Pacific Islander Enrollment : 5
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 63
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 15
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 78
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 7
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 39.5
Genders in C. P. Smith School Grades in C. P. Smith School Races in C. P. Smith School
2004 Student Enrollment: 279
Kindergarten Enrollment : 40
1st Grade Enrollment : 44
2nd Grade Enrollment : 48
3rd Grade Enrollment : 46
4th Grade Enrollment : 42
5th Grade Enrollment : 59
Female Enrollment : 130
Male Enrollment : 137
White Enrollment : 260
Black Enrollment : 2
Hispanic Enrollment : 3
Asian / Pacific Islander Enrollment : 2
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 80
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 10
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 90
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 13.3
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 20.9
2003 Student Enrollment: 296
Kindergarten Enrollment : 39
1st Grade Enrollment : 49
2nd Grade Enrollment : 46
3rd Grade Enrollment : 47
4th Grade Enrollment : 58
5th Grade Enrollment : 55
Ungraded Enrollment : 2
Female Enrollment : 151
Male Enrollment : 133
White Enrollment : 273
Black Enrollment : 6
Hispanic Enrollment : 4
Asian / Pacific Islander Enrollment : 1
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 79
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 10
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 89
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 13.8
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 21.5
2002 Student Enrollment: 302
Kindergarten Enrollment : 46
1st Grade Enrollment : 39
2nd Grade Enrollment : 51
3rd Grade Enrollment : 61
4th Grade Enrollment : 55
5th Grade Enrollment : 50
Female Enrollment : 157
Male Enrollment : 145
White Enrollment : 282
Black Enrollment : 14
Hispanic Enrollment : 5
American Indian / Alaskan Native Enrollment : 1
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 61
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 12
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 73
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 15.9
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 19
2001 Student Enrollment: 320
Kindergarten Enrollment : 34
1st Grade Enrollment : 55
2nd Grade Enrollment : 58
3rd Grade Enrollment : 56
4th Grade Enrollment : 48
5th Grade Enrollment : 69
Female Enrollment : 172
Male Enrollment : 148
White Enrollment : 302
Black Enrollment : 14
Hispanic Enrollment : 2
Asian / Pacific Islander Enrollment : 1
American Indian / Alaskan Native Enrollment : 1
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 58
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 8
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 66
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 16.1
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 19.9
Attendance Rate in C. P. Smith School
Attendance rate: 96.2% | This school: | 96.2% | | State average from 232 schools: | 95.4% |
Retention rate: 0.4% | Here: | 0.4% | | State average from 169 schools: | 3.3% |
Special education (%): 10.1% | This school: | 10.1% | | State average from 231 schools: | 12.4% |
Home study students : 5
2005 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 96.2% | This school: | 96.2% | | State average from 233 schools: | 95.2% |
Special education (%): 11.1% | Here: | 11.1% | | State average from 232 schools: | 12.3% |
Home study students : 4
2004 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 96.5% | Here: | 96.5% | | State average from 232 schools: | 95.5% |
Retention rate: 1.0% | C. P. Smith School: | 1.0% | | State average from 141 schools: | 2.4% |
Special education (%): 9.8% | Here: | 9.8% | | State average from 231 schools: | 12.3% |
Home study students : 5
2006 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 22.50
Other teachers : 19
Licensed administrators : 1
Administrative support : 1
Other staff : 5.04
Average teacher salary ($): 32,864$ | C. P. Smith School: | 32,864$ | | State average from 234 schools: | 44,460$ |
2005 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 17.40
Other teachers : 5.50
Instructional aides : 19.25
Licensed administrators : 1
Administrative support : 1
Other staff : 1.80
Average teacher salary ($): 52,891$ | Here: | 52,891$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 42,814$ |
2004 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 17.40
Other teachers : 6.10
Instructional aides : 16.25
Licensed administrators : 1
Administrative support : 1
Other staff : 4.86
Average teacher salary ($): 51,663$ | Here: | 51,663$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 41,394$ |
Risk Factor Statistics:
Poverty rate (%), July 2006: 22.6% | Here: | 22.6% | | State average from 231 schools: | 10.6% |
Poverty rate (%), Dec. 2005: 22.0% | Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 230 schools: | 10.0% |
Poverty rate town rank, July 2006: 21.0% | This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 232 schools: | 100.0% |
Poverty rate town rank, Dec. 2005: 17.0% | Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 231 schools: | 100.0% |
2007 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 23,868$ | Here: | 23,868$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 21,550$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 77.0 | This school: | 77.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 156.1 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 52,453$ | Here: | 52,453$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 51,309$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 117.0 | Here: | 117.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 156.3 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 68.2% | Here: | 68.2% | | State average from 233 schools: | 72.7% |
2006 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 23,744$ | This school: | 23,744$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 20,888$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 51.0 | C. P. Smith School: | 51.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 141.6 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 50,291$ | Here: | 50,291$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 49,082$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 111.0 | Here: | 111.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 155.9 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 71.2% | Here: | 71.2% | | State average from 233 schools: | 75.1% |
2005 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 23,034$ | This school: | 23,034$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 19,835$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 49.0 | C. P. Smith School: | 49.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 136.1 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 47,831$ | Here: | 47,831$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 46,686$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 105.0 | Here: | 105.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 139.1 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 68.2% | Here: | 68.2% | | State average from 233 schools: | 72.7% |
2007 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 63.6% | Here: | 63.6% | | State average from 233 schools: | 63.3% |
Percent student services: 7.2% | Here: | 7.2% | | State average from 230 schools: | 6.1% |
Percent staff services: 4.2% | This school: | 4.2% | | State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 7.3% | Here: | 7.3% | | State average from 233 schools: | 8.8% |
Percent operation: 17.7% | C. P. Smith School: | 17.7% | | State average from 233 schools: | 19.5% |
Financial Expenditures - C. P. Smith School Financial Expenditures - Vermont Total PK-12 current expense ($): 41,847,897$ | Here: | 41,847,897$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,286,407$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 12,592$ | This school: | 12,592$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 11,797$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 47,353,513$ | Here: | 47,353,513$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 7,256,725$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 456,790$ | This school: | 456,790$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 1,769,547$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 6,315,485$ | This school: | 6,315,485$ | | State average from 203 schools: | 1,421,788$ |
2006 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 63.5% | Here: | 63.5% | | State average from 233 schools: | 63.4% |
Percent student services: 7.4% | This school: | 7.4% | | State average from 232 schools: | 6.0% |
Percent staff services: 4.4% | Here: | 4.4% | | State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 6.9% | Here: | 6.9% | | State average from 233 schools: | 9.0% |
Percent operation: 17.9% | C. P. Smith School: | 17.9% | | State average from 233 schools: | 18.3% |
Financial Expenditures - C. P. Smith School Financial Expenditures - Vermont Total PK-12 current expense ($): 40,042,572$ | This school: | 40,042,572$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,034,752$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 11,953$ | C. P. Smith School: | 11,953$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 11,289$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 44,639,319$ | Here: | 44,639,319$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,992,659$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 406,381$ | Here: | 406,381$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 1,629,679$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 6,050,779$ | Here: | 6,050,779$ | | State average from 203 schools: | 1,339,712$ |
2005 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 61.3% | Here: | 61.3% | | State average from 232 schools: | 63.3% |
Percent student services: 7.3% | C. P. Smith School: | 7.3% | | State average from 230 schools: | 6.2% |
Percent staff services: 4.7% | C. P. Smith School: | 4.7% | | State average from 231 schools: | 3.4% |
Percent leadership services: 7.6% | C. P. Smith School: | 7.6% | | State average from 232 schools: | 9.1% |
Percent operation: 19.1% | Here: | 19.1% | | State average from 232 schools: | 18.1% |
Financial Expenditures - C. P. Smith School Financial Expenditures - Vermont Total PK-12 current expense ($): 37,114,684$ | Here: | 37,114,684$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 5,698,600$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 11,288$ | C. P. Smith School: | 11,288$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 10,333$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 41,978,136$ | C. P. Smith School: | 41,978,136$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 6,690,749$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 320,534$ | Here: | 320,534$ | | State average from 231 schools: | 1,491,304$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 5,263,069$ | This school: | 5,263,069$ | | State average from 203 schools: | 1,228,117$ |
NECAP Results in C. P. Smith School
NECAP Math Results - C. P. Smith School NECAP Math Results - Vermont
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.46 | Here: | 0.46 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.21 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.21 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Female) - C. P. Smith School NECAP Math Results (Female) - Vermont
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.10 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.10 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.51 | Here: | 0.51 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.25 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.25 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Male) - C. P. Smith School NECAP Math Results (Male) - Vermont
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.43 | Here: | 0.43 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.23 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.23 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (FRL) - C. P. Smith School NECAP Math Results (FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.06 | Here: | 0.06 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.36 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.36 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.38 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.24 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.38 | This school: | 0.38 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.28 |
NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - C. P. Smith School NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.52 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.52 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.47 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | This school: | 0.11 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.13 |
2007 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP Reading Results - C. P. Smith School NECAP Reading Results - Vermont
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.53 | Here: | 0.53 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.11 |
NECAP Reading Results (Female) - C. P. Smith School NECAP Reading Results (Female) - Vermont
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23 | Here: | 0.23 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.48 | Here: | 0.48 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.16 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.16 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.08 |
NECAP Reading Results (Male) - C. P. Smith School NECAP Reading Results (Male) - Vermont
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.12 | Here: | 0.12 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.12 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.58 | This school: | 0.58 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.12 | This school: | 0.12 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.14 |
NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - C. P. Smith School NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.42 | Here: | 0.42 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.22 | Here: | 0.22 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.28 | Here: | 0.28 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - C. P. Smith School NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23 | Here: | 0.23 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.60 | Here: | 0.60 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.13 | This school: | 0.13 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.04 | Here: | 0.04 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.08 |
2007 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP writing Results - C. P. Smith School NECAP writing Results - Vermont
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.29 | Here: | 0.29 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.14 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.33 | Here: | 0.33 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.33 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.21 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.17 | This school: | 0.17 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.21 |
NECAP writing Results (Female) - C. P. Smith School NECAP writing Results (Female) - Vermont
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.32 | This school: | 0.32 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.32 | Here: | 0.32 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.39 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.30 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.13 |
NECAP writing Results (Male) - C. P. Smith School NECAP writing Results (Male) - Vermont
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.25 | Here: | 0.25 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.08 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.35 | Here: | 0.35 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.25 | This school: | 0.25 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.34 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.15 | Here: | 0.15 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.29 |
NECAP writing Results (FRL) - C. P. Smith School NECAP writing Results (FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.21 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.21 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.05 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.29 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.29 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | Here: | 0.21 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.37 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.29 | Here: | 0.29 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.32 |
NECAP writing Results (Not FRL) - C. P. Smith School NECAP writing Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.32 | Here: | 0.32 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.14 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.36 | Here: | 0.36 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.37 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | Here: | 0.21 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.11 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.16 |
2006 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 179
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | This school: | 0.18 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.41 | Here: | 0.41 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.25 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.25 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.15 | This school: | 0.15 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.18 |
Female Students tested : 93
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.20 | This school: | 0.20 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.39 | Here: | 0.39 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.27 | Here: | 0.27 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.14 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Male Students tested : 86
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16 | This school: | 0.16 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.44 | Here: | 0.44 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.23 | Here: | 0.23 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.16 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.16 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 44
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.34 | This school: | 0.34 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.34 | Here: | 0.34 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.23 | Here: | 0.23 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.28 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 135
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.22 | This school: | 0.22 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.44 | Here: | 0.44 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.22 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.22 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.13 |
2006 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 179
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16 | Here: | 0.16 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.15 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.57 | Here: | 0.57 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.17 | This school: | 0.17 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.11 |
Female Students tested : 93
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.56 | Here: | 0.56 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.15 | This school: | 0.15 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | Here: | 0.11 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.08 |
Male Students tested : 86
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.13 | This school: | 0.13 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.11 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.59 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.59 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.14 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 44
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.55 | This school: | 0.55 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.25 | Here: | 0.25 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.27 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.20 | This school: | 0.20 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.19 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 135
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.21 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.21 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.58 | Here: | 0.58 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.14 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.14 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.07 |
2006 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 47
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.36 | Here: | 0.36 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.35 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.34 | Here: | 0.34 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.23 |
Female Students tested : 22
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.36 | Here: | 0.36 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.32 | Here: | 0.32 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.15 |
Male Students tested : 25
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.08 | This school: | 0.08 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.08 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.36 | This school: | 0.36 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.30 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.36 | Here: | 0.36 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.30 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 13
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.23 | This school: | 0.23 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.46 | This school: | 0.46 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.31 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.31 | Here: | 0.31 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.36 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 34
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.41 | Here: | 0.41 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.38 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.29 | Here: | 0.29 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.12 | Here: | 0.12 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.18 |
2005 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 187
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16 | Here: | 0.16 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.48 | This school: | 0.48 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.20 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Female Students tested : 93
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.17 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.17 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.47 | Here: | 0.47 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.19 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.16 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.16 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Male Students tested : 94
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | This school: | 0.14 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.48 | This school: | 0.48 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | Here: | 0.21 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 51
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.04 | Here: | 0.04 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.08 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.41 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.41 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.31 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.31 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.23 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.23 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 136
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.50 | This school: | 0.50 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.16 | Here: | 0.16 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.14 |
2005 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 185
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | This school: | 0.18 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.54 | Here: | 0.54 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.24 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | This school: | 0.09 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.10 |
Female Students tested : 93
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.23 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.50 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.50 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.07 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.08 |
Male Students tested : 92
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.10 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.58 | Here: | 0.58 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.51 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.17 | This school: | 0.17 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.11 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.13 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 49
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.06 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.51 | Here: | 0.51 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.27 | This school: | 0.27 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14 | This school: | 0.14 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.17 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 136
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.22 | Here: | 0.22 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.54 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.54 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.16 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.16 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | This school: | 0.07 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.08 |
2005 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 40
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.47 | Here: | 0.47 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.33 | Here: | 0.33 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.34 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | This school: | 0.10 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.14 |
Female Students tested : 24
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.46 | Here: | 0.46 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.50 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.29 | Here: | 0.29 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.29 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.07 |
Male Students tested : 16
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.50 | Here: | 0.50 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.36 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.38 | Here: | 0.38 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.39 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.13 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.13 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.20 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 11
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.46 | Here: | 0.46 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.33 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.46 | Here: | 0.46 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.41 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.22 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 29
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.14 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.48 | Here: | 0.48 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.28 | C. P. Smith School: | 0.28 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.11 |
|
