
Back to: Miami, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 34.
3737 NW 188TH ST
Miami, FL 33055
Other nearby schools ratings:
Carol City Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  MiamiDade County:  45  Miami:  44  Carol City Middle School:  34 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Miami, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (305) 6242652 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6051
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 6232955
Principal: Kim W Cox
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 103
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://carolcitymiddle.dadeschools.net/
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  38%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  35%  State average from 612 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  89%  State average from 613 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  14%  State average from 612 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  55%  State average from 613 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  59%  State average from 612 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  69%  State average from 613 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  64%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  423  State average from 613 schools:  545 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: D
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  89%  State average from 614 schools:  56% 
Minority RateHere:  99%  State average from 614 schools:  49% 
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 831 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 833 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 296
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 767
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 739
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 766
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 737
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 722 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 723 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 259
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 677
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 649
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 677
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 649
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 80
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 738 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 739 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 257
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 680
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 657
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 678
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 655
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  12%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 96
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  11%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 95
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  39%  State average from 613 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  36%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  94%  State average from 613 schools:  92% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  19%  State average from 613 schools:  49% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  58%  State average from 613 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  62%  State average from 613 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  76%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  72%  State average from 613 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  456  State average from 613 schools:  553 
Percent TestedCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  99%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  88%  State average from 613 schools:  52% 
Minority RateHere:  100%  State average from 613 schools:  48% 
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 907 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 905 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 264
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 830
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 800
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 822
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 788
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 782 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 780 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 232
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 726
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 701
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 719
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 691
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 89
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 794 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 793 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 231
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 726
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 700
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 720
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 690
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  19%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 113
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 107
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  37%  State average from 603 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  33%  State average from 603 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  95%  State average from 603 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  15%  State average from 602 schools:  46% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  58%  State average from 602 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  63%  State average from 602 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  69%  State average from 602 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  70%  State average from 602 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  440  State average from 602 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 604 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  87%  State average from 605 schools:  49% 
Minority RateCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 605 schools:  48% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 824 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 824 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 249
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 770
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 730
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 763
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 723
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 714 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 714 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 222
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 670
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 636
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 664
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 630
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 86
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 85
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 722 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 722 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 220
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 674
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 636
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 667
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 629
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 106
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  18%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 103
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  91%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  79%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 539 schools:  91% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  63%  State average from 538 schools:  44% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  75%  State average from 539 schools:  61% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math GainsHere:  62%  State average from 539 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  70%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  50%  State average from 539 schools:  67% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  576  State average from 539 schools:  523 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 539 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  28%  State average from 541 schools:  49% 
Minority RateCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  19%  State average from 542 schools:  53% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  86%  State average from 526 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  82%  State average from 526 schools:  63% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  74%  State average from 526 schools:  89% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  70%  State average from 526 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  71%  State average from 526 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  56%  State average from 526 schools:  72% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  439  State average from 526 schools:  425 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 526 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  27%  State average from 525 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  19%  State average from 526 schools:  52% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 44
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 192
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 192
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 38
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 163
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 163
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 40
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 40
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 42
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 42
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  89%  State average from 505 schools:  59% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  82%  State average from 505 schools:  60% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  77%  State average from 506 schools:  83% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  76%  State average from 505 schools:  61% 
Making Math GainsHere:  73%  State average from 505 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  75%  State average from 505 schools:  66% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  472  State average from 506 schools:  397 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 506 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  23%  State average from 506 schools:  51% 
Minority RateHere:  16%  State average from 506 schools:  50% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1582  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  346  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  15%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  58%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  88%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1651  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  12%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  13%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  19%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  75%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  2  State average:  2 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1721  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  42%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  79%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1489  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  271  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  40%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  27%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  36%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  3  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1647  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  30%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  30%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  40%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1754  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  282  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  38%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  36%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  19%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  25%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  3  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  47%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  21%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  68%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  260  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  54%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  33%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  11%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  12%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1483  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  9%  State average:  8% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  18%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  52%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  6%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  76%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  5  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1592  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  23%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  19%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  73%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1707  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  341  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  24%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  42%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  71%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1538  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  278  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  46%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  32%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  16%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1%  State average:  8% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  22%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  2  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1680  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  279  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  38%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  29%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  33%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1795  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  28%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  35%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  37%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  4  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1484  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1648  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1732  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1536  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1629  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1773  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  333  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  269  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1539  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  352  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1612  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1674  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1553  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  282  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1688  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  281  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1796  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 38
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 89%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 275
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 90%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1523  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1612  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1680  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1467  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  267  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1629  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1773  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  338  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  269  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1563  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  357  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1586  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1720  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  344  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1485  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  266  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1696  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1807  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  647  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  657  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Median NPRCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  73  State average:  69 
Initial Understanding (max 12)CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  10  State average:  10 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  32  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  672  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Median NPRCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  76  State average:  71 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  261  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  642  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  7  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  286  State average:  201 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  658  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Median NPRCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  45  State average:  66 
Informational (max 18)CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  10  State average:  12 
Functional (max 18)CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  10  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  250  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  668  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 51
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  291  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 67%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 259
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  282  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 88%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1510  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1577  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1654  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1502  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 151
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1685  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1719  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1561  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 157
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1808  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  329  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1822  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1741  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 82
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1520  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  348  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1568  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007CAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1602  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1557  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 45
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1679  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1683  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1524  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 159
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1729  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1748  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1693  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 55
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 50
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  655  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 23
Mean Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  651  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 42
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  674  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  685  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 50
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  644  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 23
Mean Scale ScoreCAROL CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:  661  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 82
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 42
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  670  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 56
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  682  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 24
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  330  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 83%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 14
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 96%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 79%
