Carver Exceptional Center School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 12.

2934 E HILLSBOROUGH AVE
Tampa, FL 33610

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Terrace Community Middle School (6.5 miles):

92
Project Craft School (0.0 miles):

74
Trinity Upper School (3.5 miles):

60
Pivot Charter School (15.9 miles):

46
Orange Grove Middle Magnet School (1.7 miles):

36
Hospital/Homebound/Homebased Programs School (2.0 miles):

21
Carver Exceptional Center School:

12
Middleton High School (0.7 miles):

10
Carver Exceptional Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Carver Exceptional Center School:

12

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 236-3500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 63
School type: Senior High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 236-3515
Principal: Bradford Mueller
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 133 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

46%
State average from 133 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 132 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 133 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

470
State average from 133 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 132 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 137 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 137 schools:

53%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 674 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 673 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 296
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 636
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 616

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 634
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 613
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 379 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 379 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 168
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 364
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 349

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 169 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 317 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 316 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 137
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 287
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

69%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

445
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

98%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

42%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 679 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 675 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 346
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 644
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 615

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 642
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 613
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 380 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 378 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 191
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 365
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 344

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 365
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 289 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 140
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 270
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 269
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 124 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 124 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

78%
State average from 125 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

36%
State average from 122 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 122 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 122 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 122 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 122 schools:

70%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

484
State average from 122 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 124 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 126 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

46%
State average from 125 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 713 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 713 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 304
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 661
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 615

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 661
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 611
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 368 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 368 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 156
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 329

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 327
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 196 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 196 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 282
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 282
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 259
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (76%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (74%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (79%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (84%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (85%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (84%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (84%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

1417
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

60%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

30%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1451
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

83%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

6%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

9
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1943
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1954
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

56%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

205
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

93%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

34%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1589
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

78%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

11%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1941
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

23%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2007
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

329
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

87%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1461
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1916
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1897
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

192
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1488
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

217
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1945
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

308
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1979
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 5
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 26%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 361
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1159
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

212
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

1156
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

193
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1518
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1924
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

213
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1199
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

200
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1352
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

198
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 95%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 1
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1656
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1937
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1970
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

15
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

617
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

16
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

18
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

614
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

12
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

16
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

29
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

9
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

362
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

695
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

251
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

705
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

201
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 6%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 59%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 323
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

285
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1297
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 58%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1222
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1117
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 105

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1449
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1422
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1275
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 147

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

175
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1434
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1429
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1176
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 253

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1489
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 1
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 71%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1521
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1446
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 76

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Median NPR: 15
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
Here:

632
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 24
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Here:

633
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 17
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 21
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
CARVER EXCEPTIONAL CENTER:

638
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 26
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 2
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 23
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 37
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

209
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 2
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 6
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 60%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 40%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Tampa, FL
  5. Carver Exceptional Center School in Tampa, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.