Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Cedar Creek Int School in CEDAR CREEK, TX
(05-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23
Address
 151 VOSS PKWY
CEDAR CREEK, TX 78612
Telephone
(512) 772-7475
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.bisdtx.org
City-data.com school rating
23
Students
802
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
48.9
Free lunch eligible students
514
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
68
School district
BASTROP ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CEDAR CREEK H S (2.8 miles):

36
BASTROP MIDDLE (9.0 miles):

27
RED ROCK EL (9.8 miles):

26
CEDAR CREEK MIDDLE (0.3 miles):

25
Cedar Creek Int School:

23
BASTROP INT (8.6 miles):

17
BLUEBONNET EL (3.8 miles):

14
CEDAR CREEK EL (1.6 miles):

8
DEL VALLE OPPORTUNITY CTR (9.6 miles):

7
Cedar Creek Int School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
CEDAR CREEK:

23
Cedar Creek Int School:

23

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 802
Enrollment in 2015: 806
Enrollment in 2014: 785
Enrollment in 2013: 744
Enrollment in 2012: 709
Enrollment in 2011: 731
Enrollment in 2010: 719
Enrollment in 2009: 673
Enrollment in 2008: 609
Enrollment in 2007: 603
Enrollment in 2006: 553
Enrollment in 2005: 531
Enrollment in 2004: 540

Cedar Creek Int School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeG05G06Total
All students385417802
Female students161215376
Male students224202426
American Indian/Alaska Native students1 - 1
Asian students224
Hispanic students286307593
Black students91423
White students8185166
Two or More Races students6915

Enrollment by grade:
5th grade enrollment: 385
6th grade enrollment: 417

Cedar Creek Int School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 376 (46.9%)
School:

46.9%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 426 (53.1%)
Here:

53.1%
State:

50.1%

Cedar Creek Int School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Cedar Creek Int School:

0.1%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 4 (0.5%)
Cedar Creek Int School:

0.5%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 593 (73.9%)
Here:

73.9%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 23 (2.9%)
Cedar Creek Int School:

2.9%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 166 (20.7%)
School:

20.7%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 15 (1.9%)
Here:

1.9%
State:

2.1%

Cedar Creek Int School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 582 (72.6%)
School:

72.6%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 514 (64.1%)
Cedar Creek Int School:

64.1%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 68 (8.5%)
Cedar Creek Int School:

8.5%
Texas:

6.2%

Cedar Creek Int School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 48.9

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 1.8
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 28
Number of FTE nurses: 2
Number of FTE psychologists: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

16.4
State:

15.6

Cedar Creek Int School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,131,561
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 47.9 (Salary Expenditures: $2,523,270)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 8.5 (Salary Expenditures: $166,691)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4.5 (Salary Expenditures: $223,763)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $217,837)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $89,686
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,295,280
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,569,977
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 11.5 (Salary Expenditures: $233,495)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5.5 (Salary Expenditures: $273,971)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $217,837)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $289,949

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 222 (male: 118, female: 104)
  • Hispanic: 220 (male: 116, female: 104)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 31 (male: 23, female: 8)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic62
  • White20
  • Multirace4
  • LEP35
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 86 (male: 56, female: 30)
  • Hispanic: 62 (male: 43, female: 19)
  • White: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 35 (male: 25, female: 10)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic49
  • Black4
  • White40
  • Multirace2
  • LEP13
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 95 (male: 60, female: 35)
  • Hispanic: 49 (male: 35, female: 14)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 40 (male: 23, female: 17)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 11, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 1,975 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 6th grade students retained
School:

1.0%
State:

6.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic19
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White37
  • Multirace4
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 66 (male: 35, female: 31)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 37 (male: 23, female: 14)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

82.3
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,265 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,593
  • Males1,586
  • Females1,600
  • Hispanic1,582
  • Black1,606
  • White1,651
  • Multirace1,535
Math Average Scale Score:

1,593
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 473
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 474

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.4 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.7 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

24%
29%
27%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 223, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 18%)
26%
29%
27%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,600, Tested: 250, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 21%)
23%
29%
27%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 366, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 17%)
28%
28%
27%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 22%)
22%
22%
34%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 32%)
6%
32%
30%
32%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,535, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 17%)
42%
33%
8%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,525
  • Males1,514
  • Females1,534
  • Hispanic1,509
  • Black1,569
  • White1,594
  • Multirace1,515
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,525
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 468
# Absent - Not Tested: 6
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 474

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

35%
29%
20%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,514, Tested: 220, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 12%)
37%
30%
21%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 248, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 19%)
34%
27%
20%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,509, Tested: 365, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 12%)
40%
28%
20%
12%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 22%)
33%
11%
34%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 82, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 33%)
17%
27%
23%
33%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 0%)
27%
46%
27%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,790
  • Males3,808
  • Females3,775
  • Hispanic3,720
  • Black3,971
  • White4,083
  • Multirace3,735
Science Average Scale Score:

3,790
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 477
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 478

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.9 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

29%
36%
23%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,808, Tested: 224, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
26%
36%
25%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,775, Tested: 253, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 11%)
31%
36%
22%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,720, Tested: 368, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 8%)
33%
38%
21%
8%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,971, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 22%)
11%
45%
22%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,083, Tested: 86, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 26%)
10%
27%
37%
26%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,735, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 8%)
38%
31%
23%
8%

5th Grade (Spanish)
Math Average Scale Score:

1,494
Texas:

298
Math students tested: 5
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 5

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.4 (38%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.4 (35%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

60%
20%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,494, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
60%
20%
20%

Reading Average Scale Score:

1,489
Texas:

683
Reading students tested: 5
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 5

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (46%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 60%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

40%
60%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
40%
60%

Science Average Scale Score:

3,509
State:

857
Science students tested: 5
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 5

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.8 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.4 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

60%
40%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,509, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,606
  • Males1,607
  • Females1,605
  • Hispanic1,588
  • Black1,563
  • White1,664
  • Multirace1,729
Math Average Scale Score:

1,606
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 468
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 468

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.6 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (45%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

32%
34%
22%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 249, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 13%)
34%
32%
21%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 219, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 11%)
31%
36%
22%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,588, Tested: 356, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 8%)
37%
35%
20%
8%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,563, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 0%)
50%
20%
30%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,664, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 25%)
17%
32%
26%
25%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,729, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
10%
30%
20%
40%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,542
  • Males1,527
  • Females1,558
  • Hispanic1,524
  • Black1,490
  • White1,605
  • Multirace1,642
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,542
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 468
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 468

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.2 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

44%
31%
14%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,527, Tested: 249, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 9%)
52%
26%
13%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,558, Tested: 219, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 13%)
36%
35%
16%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 356, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 6%)
49%
32%
13%
6%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,490, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
60%
20%
10%
10%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 89, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 27%)
26%
27%
20%
27%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,642, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 30%)
10%
40%
20%
30%

Health & Safety


Offenses:
(State average from 2,394 schools)

An incident refers to a specific criminal act involving one or more victims and offenders. For example, if two students are robbed without a weapon, at the same time and place, this is classified as two robbery victimizations but only one robbery without a weapon incident

A weapon is any instrument or object used with the intent to threaten, injure, or kill. This includes look-alikes if they are used to threaten others.

Robbery is taking or attempting to take anything of value that is owned by another person or organization, under confrontational circumstances by force or threat of force or violence and/or by putting the victim in fear. A key difference between robbery and theft/larceny is that robbery involves a threat or assault.

Physical attack or fight refers to an actual and intentional touching or striking of another person against his/her will, or the intentional causing of bodily harm to an individual. Physical attack or fight does not include rape.

A threat refers to an act where there was no physical contact between the offender and victim but the victim felt that physical harm could have occurred based on verbal or nonverbal communication by the offender. This includes nonverbal threats (e.g., brandishing a weapon), and verbal threats of physical harm which are made in person. Threats made over the telephone or threatening letters are excluded.
At least one incident at this school that involved a shooting: No
Any of this school's students, faculty, or staff died as a result of a homicide committed at this school: No

Incidents of robbery without a weapon: 7

Incidents of physical attack or fight without a weapon: 4

Incidents of threats of physical attack without a weapon: 7


Total incidents per 1,000 students
Here:

22.4
State:

38.0

Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)

Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Cedar Creek Int School:

2.5
Texas:

17.4

Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
Here:

2.5
Texas:

13.1


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic40
  • Black2
  • White22
  • Multirace4
  • LEP22
  • IDEA10
  • 50413
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 68 (male: 36, female: 32)
  • Hispanic: 40 (male: 23, female: 17)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Cedar Creek Int School:

84.8
State:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Mechanical restraint refers to the use of any device or equipment to restrict a student's freedom of movement. The term does not include devices implemented by trained school personnel, or utilized by a student that have been prescribed by an appropriate medical or related services professional and are used for the specific and approved purposes for which such devices were designed, such as:
  • Adaptive devices or mechanical supports used to achieve proper body position, balance, or alignment to allow greater freedom of mobility than would be possible without the use of such devices or mechanical supports;
  • Vehicle safety restraints when used as intended during the transport of a student in a moving vehicle;
  • Restraints for medical immobilization; or Orthopedically prescribed devices that permit a student to participate in activities without risk of harm.


Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

2.5
State:

5.4

Total Number of Non-IDEA students subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Non-IDEA students subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

2.5
State:

3.0

Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

7.5
State:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic46
  • Black13
  • White7
  • Multirace1
  • LEP38
  • IDEA17
  • 50416
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 67 (male: 59, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 46 (male: 38, female: 8)
  • Black: 13 (all male)
  • White: 7 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 1 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 38 (male: 31, female: 7)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 17 (all male)
  • Section 504: 16 (all male)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 22

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Cedar Creek Int School:

27.4
Texas:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic103
  • American Indian2
  • Black4
  • White13
  • Multirace4
  • LEP67
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 126 (male: 85, female: 41)
  • Hispanic: 103 (male: 71, female: 32)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 67 (male: 50, female: 17)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 11

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Here:

13.7
State:

27.5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 11

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
School:

13.7
Texas:

12.0

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic34
  • Black2
  • White19
  • Multirace4
  • LEP19
  • 50434
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 59 (male: 47, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 34 (male: 29, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • Section 504: 34 (male: 29, female: 5)

Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2
  • Two or More Races: 2

    Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 6 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss CEDAR CREEK, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents