|
Back to: San Luis, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23.
Address: 1130 North 10th Avenue
San Luis, WI 85349
Grade span: K-6
Schedule: 07:30 AM to 04:00 PM
Principal: Mrs. Bethany Loucks
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 627-6958
Fax: (928) 627-4480
Homepage: www.gesd32.org
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 4
- Grade 6
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| This school: | 96.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 2
Enrollment In 2003: 746
Enrollment In 2004: 686
Enrollment In 2005: 698
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 31.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 17.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 33.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 11.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 34.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 13.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 31.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 12.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Not Evaluated
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Not Evaluated
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2004: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2004: Not Evaluated
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: No
Grade 3
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 98
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
Female Tested: 57
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 12.64% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 47.77% |
Male Tested: 41
Male Percent Tested: 91%
Hispanic Tested: 97
Hispanic Percent Tested: 95%
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 638 schools: | 47.17% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 71%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 88
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 96
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 96%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 95
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 106
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 10.31% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 25.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 925 schools: | 54.83% |
Female Tested: 53
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 24.30% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 56.93% |
Male Tested: 54
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 12.75% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 27.38% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 16.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 52.84% |
Hispanic Tested: 106
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 35.33% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 680 schools: | 46.29% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 98
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 8.70% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 24.05% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 58.09% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 82
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 43.12% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.06% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 102
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 35.14% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 46.72% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 618 schools: | 9.81% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 16.16% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 22.22% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 99
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
Female Tested: 42
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 660 schools: | 9.08% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Male Tested: 57
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 13.29% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 33.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
Hispanic Tested: 99
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 15.70% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 31.93% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 49.26% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 12
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 351 schools: | 34.14% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 385 schools: | 31.88% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 33.95% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 87
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 31.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 97
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 101
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
Female Tested: 57
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 14.62% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 33.20% |
Male Tested: 43
Male Percent Tested: 96%
Hispanic Tested: 100
Hispanic Percent Tested: 98%
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 629 schools: | 32.65% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 11
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 79%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 90
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 99
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 98
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 106
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 10.99% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 51.29% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 863 schools: | 20.62% |
Female Tested: 53
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 11.33% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 18.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 52.46% |
Male Tested: 54
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 12.22% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 18.70% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 50.15% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 22.06% |
Hispanic Tested: 106
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 571 schools: | 15.81% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 25.51% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 50.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 98
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 16.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 9.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 17.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 45.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 53.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 22.42% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 82
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 30.30% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 44.63% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 102
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 15.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 25.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 50.39% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 10.72% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 99
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 1.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Female Tested: 42
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 19.32% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 18.74% |
Male Tested: 57
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Hispanic Tested: 99
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 607 schools: | 15.23% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 24.80% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 52.65% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 1.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 9.55% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 12
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 92.0% | | State average from 407 schools: | 29.90% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 35.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 87
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 8.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 40.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 97
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 29.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 115
All Students Percent Tested: 97%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 2.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
Female Tested: 51
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 774 schools: | 24.29% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 23.51% |
Male Tested: 64
Male Percent Tested: 96%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 72.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 22.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 37.25% |
Hispanic Tested: 115
Hispanic Percent Tested: 97%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 38.83% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 630 schools: | 26.73% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 30.26% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 112
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 106
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 74.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 26.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 26.17% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 116
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 10.88% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 908 schools: | 23.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 920 schools: | 57.71% |
Female Tested: 64
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 21.86% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 60.56% |
Male Tested: 52
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 13.43% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 25.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 841 schools: | 54.99% |
Hispanic Tested: 116
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 567 schools: | 17.19% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 665 schools: | 32.71% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 48.42% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 108
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 21.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 906 schools: | 61.89% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 84
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 41.0% | | State average from 345 schools: | 41.11% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 33.27% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 116
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 16.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 41.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 32.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 49.11% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 9.64% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 45.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 10.07% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 642 schools: | 9.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 8.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 10.76% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 341 schools: | 25.38% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 4.39% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 99
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Female Tested: 49
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 22.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 8.85% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 22.65% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 60.68% |
Male Tested: 50
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 34.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 13.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Hispanic Tested: 99
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 15.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 40.0% | | State average from 695 schools: | 33.01% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 91
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 24.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 7.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 97
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 116
All Students Percent Tested: 97%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 13.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Female Tested: 52
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 14.20% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 41.56% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 14.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 32.52% |
Male Tested: 64
Male Percent Tested: 96%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.56% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 13.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 788 schools: | 33.45% |
Hispanic Tested: 116
Hispanic Percent Tested: 97%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 577 schools: | 20.88% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 60.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 48.88% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 12.61% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 19.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 113
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 107
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 21.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 58.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 47.62% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 12.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 10.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 20.07% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 116
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 14.02% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 904 schools: | 19.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 47.89% |
Female Tested: 64
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 13.27% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 19.81% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 49.58% |
Male Tested: 52
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.23% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.29% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 844 schools: | 46.18% |
Hispanic Tested: 116
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 20.32% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 30.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 25.58% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 45.55% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 108
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 10.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 18.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 51.30% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 84
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 348 schools: | 27.96% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 351 schools: | 30.11% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 352 schools: | 37.83% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 116
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 652 schools: | 20.35% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 697 schools: | 25.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 45.43% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 99
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 37.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 19.39% |
Female Tested: 49
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 749 schools: | 12.44% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 851 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 50.29% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.44% |
Male Tested: 50
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 19.30% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Hispanic Tested: 99
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 19.20% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 24.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 25.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 46.24% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 611 schools: | 10.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 91
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 21.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 97
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 5: | 5.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 9.85% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 116
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 829 schools: | 9.06% |
Female Tested: 53
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 10.36% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 845 schools: | 22.62% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 865 schools: | 59.58% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 10.99% |
Male Tested: 63
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 49.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 25.46% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 54.33% |
Hispanic Tested: 116
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 608 schools: | 18.28% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 32.79% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 47.06% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 106
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 739 schools: | 9.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 4: | 47.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 4: | 1.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 9.85% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 89
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 336 schools: | 51.88% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 35.0% | | State average from 334 schools: | 35.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 116
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 17.58% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 44.0% | | State average from 723 schools: | 32.68% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 47.45% |
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 14.58% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 4.37% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 500 schools: | 4.21% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 116
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 24.20% |
Female Tested: 53
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 707 schools: | 11.07% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 17.42% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 49.82% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 24.72% |
Male Tested: 63
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 12.66% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 17.13% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 48.00% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 831 schools: | 24.74% |
Hispanic Tested: 116
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.71% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 677 schools: | 23.03% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 41.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 48.80% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 14.15% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 106
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 8.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 26.53% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 89
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 329 schools: | 27.32% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 335 schools: | 33.13% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 334 schools: | 36.67% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 116
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 4: | 29.0% | | State average from 662 schools: | 15.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 23.16% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 48.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 13.53% |
Grade 6
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 120
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 10.96% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 25.11% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 6: | 28.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 60.39% |
Female Tested: 62
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 6: | 32.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 9.26% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 23.38% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 63.79% |
Male Tested: 58
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 715 schools: | 27.02% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 57.22% |
Hispanic Tested: 120
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 489 schools: | 17.34% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 34.44% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 561 schools: | 47.82% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 6.01% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 113
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 23.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 64.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 120
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 16.64% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 576 schools: | 34.19% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 582 schools: | 48.54% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 120
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 6: | 39.0% | | State average from 767 schools: | 18.82% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 19.58% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 46.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 727 schools: | 16.52% |
Female Tested: 62
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 16.96% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 688 schools: | 20.37% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 6: | 34.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 47.76% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 17.01% |
Male Tested: 58
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 21.36% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 18.94% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 44.63% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 641 schools: | 16.97% |
Hispanic Tested: 120
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 529 schools: | 27.11% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 554 schools: | 24.71% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 558 schools: | 41.42% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 470 schools: | 8.19% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 113
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 14.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 19.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 49.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 18.22% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 120
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 27.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 571 schools: | 24.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 41.04% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 494 schools: | 7.80% |
|