U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Charlotte Correctional Institution School in Punta Gorda, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Punta Gorda, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 71.


Punta Gorda, FL 33955

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lee County High Tech Center North School (17.2 miles):

87
Vineland Elementary School (12.4 miles):

80
Charlotte Correctional Institution School:

71
Englewood Elementary School (18.6 miles):

63
Patriot Elementary School (19.5 miles):

57
East Elementary School (5.1 miles):

52
Neil Armstrong Elementary School (7.7 miles):

46
Kingsway Elementary School (8.1 miles):

36
Charlotte Correctional Institution School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Charlotte County:

48
Punta Gorda:

48
This School:

71

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA





Phone: (813) 575-2828 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 76
School number: 5101
School type: Adult
District Name: CESA
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 575-5747
Principal: Dangbe Sua
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

90%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

84%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

58%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

50%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

584
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 582 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 582 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 199
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 534
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 524

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 535
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 525
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 470 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 470 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 168
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 432
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 423

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 433
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 424
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 220 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 220 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

89%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

62%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

610
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

32%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

87%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 649 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 649 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 606
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 592

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 606
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 592
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 527 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 527 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 171
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 489
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 479

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 489
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 479
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

90%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

64%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

62%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

574
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 681 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 681 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 651
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 629

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 650
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 627
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 553 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 553 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 178
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 531
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 513

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 530
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 511
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1477
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1718
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

26%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

6%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1550
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

86%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1633
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1687
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

337
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1443
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

324
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1686
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

338
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1757
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1553
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1664
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

348
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1737
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 219
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1465
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

327
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1709
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

321
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1536
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

351
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1669
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1706
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

341
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

227
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

71
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

224
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

78
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

228
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

81
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 221
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

331
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

Back to: Punta Gorda, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.