Citrus Elementary School in Ocoee, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 46.

87 N CLARKE RD
Ocoee, FL 34761

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (8.6 miles):

98
Cypress Springs Elementary School (17.4 miles):

69
Red Bug Elementary School (15.2 miles):

60
Lake Weston Elementary School (6.9 miles):

55
Citrus Elementary School:

46
Passport Charter School (12.2 miles):

46
Palmetto Elementary School (9.1 miles):

37
Hidden Oaks Elementary School (16.5 miles):

26
Florida Virtual -District Office School (8.1 miles):

1
Citrus Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Ocoee:

48
Citrus Elementary School:

46

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Ocoee, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 445-5475 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 216
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 445-5499
Principal: Delaine Bender
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 38
Senate District: 9

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

46%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

565
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

57%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 446 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 446 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 134
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 426
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 426
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 417
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 258 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

555
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

55%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 465 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 435
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 430

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 431
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 263 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 263 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 241
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 238
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

37%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

58%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

516
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 480 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 480 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 152
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 464
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 448

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 465
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 449
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 200 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 177
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 252 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 252 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

35%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

61%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

63%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

527
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

66%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 468 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 469 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 143
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 182 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

58%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

381
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

100%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

63%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 455 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 455 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 138
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 438
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 438
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 45

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 164
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 164
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 54

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 156
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 156
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 62

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 187
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 187
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 61

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

80%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

73%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

428
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

100%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

43%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

61%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1367
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1689
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

72%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

1488
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1659
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1690
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1383
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1695
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1479
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1580
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1633
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 151
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1366
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1599
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

289
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1445
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1569
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

163
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

635
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

63
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

161
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

162
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 156
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

296
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1376
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1542
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

313
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1574
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1437
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 136

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1663
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1674
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1560
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 114

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1505
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1527
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1546
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1499
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1663
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1683
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

1555
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 128

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 156
Mean Scale Score
Here:

640
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 158
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 151
Mean Scale Score
CITRUS ELEMENTARY:

668
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 157
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 159
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 150
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 153
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

293
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 80%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2017 Advameg, Inc.