
Back to: Vero Beach, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 56.
2771 4TH ST
Vero Beach, FL 32968
Other nearby schools ratings:
Citrus Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Indian River County:  48  Vero Beach:  43  Citrus Elementary School:  56 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Phone: (772) 9788350 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 31
School number: 141
School type: Elementary
District Name: INDIAN RIVER
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (772) 9788351
Principal: John Teske
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 80
Senate District: 26
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  43%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  85%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  30%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  44%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  74%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  48%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  62%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  479  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  54%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  11%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 1
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 171
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 170
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 153
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 152
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 102
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  52%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  77%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  39%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  53%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  76%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  48%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  65%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  501  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  45%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  7%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 1
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 199 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 199 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 173
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 174
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 158
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 160
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 84
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  52%  State average from 711 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  75%  State average from 711 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  94%  State average from 711 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  43%  State average from 711 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  71%  State average from 711 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  75%  State average from 711 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  69%  State average from 711 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  64%  State average from 711 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  543  State average from 711 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  97%  State average from 711 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  42%  State average from 711 schools:  50% 
Minority RateCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6%  State average from 711 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 187 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 170
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 171
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 159
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 160
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 82
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  83%  State average from 652 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  77%  State average from 652 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  79%  State average from 652 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  51%  State average from 650 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  75%  State average from 652 schools:  72% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  70%  State average from 652 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  64%  State average from 652 schools:  67% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  55%  State average from 652 schools:  69% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  554  State average from 652 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 652 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  48%  State average from 655 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  33%  State average from 655 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 264 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 181 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  82%  State average from 643 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  78%  State average from 643 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  72%  State average from 643 schools:  81% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  57%  State average from 643 schools:  63% 
Making Math GainsHere:  70%  State average from 643 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  64%  State average from 643 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  423  State average from 643 schools:  420 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 643 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  47%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  31%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 294 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 95
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 275
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 275
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 70
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 196
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 196
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 34
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (97%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 41
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 123
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 123
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 39
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  89%  State average from 631 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  83%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  72%  State average from 631 schools:  80% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  74%  State average from 631 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  69%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  70%  State average from 631 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  457  State average from 631 schools:  417 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 631 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  46%  State average from 631 schools:  54% 
Minority RateCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  28%  State average from 631 schools:  52% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1367  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  311  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  16%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  36%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  25%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  69%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1518  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  19%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  14%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  41%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  22%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  67%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1532  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  289  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  24%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  34%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  16%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  58%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1781  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  14%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  33%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  32%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  73%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1883  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  33%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  32%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  75%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1915  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  14%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  22%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  21%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  64%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1950  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  16%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  42%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  12%  State average:  12% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  43%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2007  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  302 
Percent PassingHere:  60%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  21%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  43%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  20%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  10%  State average:  12% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  36%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  28%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  33%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  39%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  9 
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  323  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  18%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  29%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  53%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  295  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  29%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  44%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  27%  State average:  30% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  27%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1414  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  45%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  79%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1528  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  46%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  19%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  70%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1634  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  16%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  30%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  54%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1745  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  21%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  21%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  64%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1850  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  30%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  29%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  66%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1932  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  330  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  43%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  23%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  11%  State average:  10% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  77%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1982  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  33%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  33%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2040  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  95%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  43%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  43%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  89%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1331  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1524  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1588  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1779  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1846  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1937  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1976  State average:  1907 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1995  State average:  1921 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  299 
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1402  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1503  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1613  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1702  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1838  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1925  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1991  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2007  State average:  1972 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  321 
Percent Passing: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 121
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 77%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 357
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 87%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 100
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 87%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1293  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1485  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1467  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  278  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1734  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1818  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1954  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1962  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1966  State average:  1935 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  302 
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1349  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  311  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1458  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1590  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1707  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1834  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  317  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1952  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1947  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1991  State average:  1984 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  323 
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  134  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  624  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  641  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Functional (max 18)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  12  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  10 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  117  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  653  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  319  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  677  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  378  State average:  201 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  688  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Literary (max 18)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  15  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  328  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  705  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Informational (max 18)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  107  State average:  273 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  691  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Literary (max 18)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  699  State average from 2096 schools:  709 
Median NPRCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  57  State average:  65 
Initial Understanding (max 12)CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  8 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 105
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  269  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 51%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 330
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  297  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 87%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 84
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  303  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 86%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1399  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1561  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1557  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1448  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 108
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1663  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1679  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1591  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 88
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1426  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  327  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1486  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1481  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1413  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 68
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1680  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1683  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1554  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 130
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  633  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 73
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  646  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 102
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  673  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  628  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 73
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  651  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 75
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 101
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  669  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 72
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  305  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 13
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedCITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  3  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 74%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 60%
