U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Clay Springs Elementary School in Apopka, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Apopka, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 68.

555 N WEKIWA SPRINGS RD
Apopka, FL 32712

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (11.7 miles):

98
Windermere Elementary School (13.7 miles):

71
Clay Springs Elementary School:

68
Lake Mary Elementary School (9.6 miles):

61
Lake Weston Elementary School (6.6 miles):

55
Rosenwald Center School (7.0 miles):

46
Lake Orienta Elementary School (6.6 miles):

39
Pine Hills Elementary School (9.3 miles):

26
Clay Springs Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Apopka:

45
Clay Springs Elementary School:

68

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Apopka, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations


Phone: (407) 884-2275 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 991
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 884-2289
Principal: Nancy Schroeder
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 24
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 37
Senate District: 9

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

560
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 382 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 382 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

89%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

90%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

75%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

603
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

24%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 376 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 376 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 126
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 357

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 356
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 282 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

95%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

72%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

626
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

24%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 356 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 356 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

49%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

533
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 376 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 376 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 123
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 350
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 220 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

86%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

444
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 373 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 371 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 101
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 353
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 352
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 66

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 227
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 227
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 73
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 111
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

70%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

433
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1593
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

40%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

23%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1739
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1792
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

28%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1754
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

351
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1542
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1697
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

344
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1628
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

371
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1658
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

346
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1785
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

358
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 125
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1469
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1762
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1572
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

126
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

69
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

117
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

673
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

17
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

113
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

687
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

86
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 116
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

331
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1315
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1574
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1600
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1423
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 177

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1680
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1696
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1595
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 100

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1381
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1497
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

309
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1513
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1428
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 85

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1679
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1683
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1562
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 120

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 123
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 56
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 133
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117
Mean Scale Score
Here:

674
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 123
Mean Scale Score
Here:

624
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 133
Mean Scale Score
CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

648
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 129
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

305
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 85%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

Back to: Apopka, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.