
Back to: Apopka, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 68.
555 N WEKIWA SPRINGS RD
Apopka, FL 32712
Other nearby schools ratings:
Clay Springs Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Orange County:  44  Apopka:  45  Clay Springs Elementary School:  68 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Apopka, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (407) 8842275 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 991
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 8842289
Principal: Nancy Schroeder
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 24
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 37
Senate District: 9
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  89%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  88%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  89%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  70%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  65%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  58%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  48%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  53%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  560  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  28%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  20%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 382 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 382 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 367
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 367
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 284
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 284
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 36
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 94
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  89%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  90%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  90%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  75%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  73%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  60%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  72%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  54%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  603  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  26%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  24%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 376 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 376 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 126
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 357
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 356
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 282 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 270
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 270
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 24
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 26
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 97
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 96
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  93%  State average from 711 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  95%  State average from 711 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  85%  State average from 711 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  72%  State average from 711 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  77%  State average from 711 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  69%  State average from 711 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  72%  State average from 711 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  63%  State average from 711 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  626  State average from 711 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 711 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  24%  State average from 711 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  23%  State average from 711 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 356 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 356 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 339
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 339
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 250
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 250
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 74
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  76%  State average from 652 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  70%  State average from 652 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 652 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  49%  State average from 650 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  72%  State average from 652 schools:  72% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  61%  State average from 652 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  57%  State average from 652 schools:  67% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  62%  State average from 652 schools:  69% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  533  State average from 652 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 652 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  42%  State average from 655 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  44%  State average from 655 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 376 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 376 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  98%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 123
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 350
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 220 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  99%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  98%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  39%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  86%  State average from 643 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  76%  State average from 643 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  78%  State average from 643 schools:  81% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  69%  State average from 643 schools:  63% 
Making Math GainsHere:  68%  State average from 643 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  67%  State average from 643 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  444  State average from 643 schools:  420 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 643 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  32%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  37%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 373 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 371 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 101
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 353
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 352
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 66
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 227
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 227
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 24
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 73
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 72
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 112
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 111
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 31
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 56
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 56
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  82%  State average from 631 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  76%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  70%  State average from 631 schools:  80% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  75%  State average from 631 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  65%  State average from 631 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  433  State average from 631 schools:  417 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 631 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  36%  State average from 631 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  32%  State average from 631 schools:  52% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1593  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  348  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  40%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  88%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  20  State average:  17 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1739  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  347  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  12%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  21%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  35%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  24%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  80%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  21  State average:  19 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1792  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  31%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  37%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  84%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  3 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  341  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  26%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  17%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  64%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1619  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  369  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4%  State average:  8% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  27%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  38%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  28%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  92%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1698  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  356  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  11%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  24%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  39%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  22%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  85%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1754  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  351  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  21%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  37%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  75%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1542  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1697  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1812  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  344  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1628  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  371  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1658  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  346  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1785  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  358  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 125
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 81%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 7
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1469  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1762  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  351  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1819  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  278  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1572  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  359  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1732  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  363  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1774  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  355  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  126  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  642  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Median NPRCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  69  State average:  61 
Informational (max 18)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
Interpretation (max 20)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  15  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  673  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Literary (max 18)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  15  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  17  State average:  15 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  113  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  687  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  13 
Functional (max 18)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  15  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11  State average:  9 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  190 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 116
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  331  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 84%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 4
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 2
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1315  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1574  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1600  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1423  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 177
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1680  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1696  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1595  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 100
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1381  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1497  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500CLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  309  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1513  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1428  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 85
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1679  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1683  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1562  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 120
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 123
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  627  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 56
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 133
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  649  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  674  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 123
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  624  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 133
Mean Scale ScoreCLAY SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  648  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  668  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 129
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  305  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 13
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 85%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 69%
