Coachman Fundamental Middle School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 74.

2235 NE COACHMAN RD
Clearwater, FL 33765

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hospital/Homebound School (1.3 miles):

90
Coachman Fundamental Middle School:

74
Palm Harbor Middle School (6.6 miles):

72
Dunedin Highland Middle School (2.7 miles):

59
Oak Grove Middle School (1.8 miles):

45
Gulf Middle School (18.8 miles):

36
Thurgood Marshall Middle School (15.9 miles):

26
Calvin A. Hunsinger School (2.7 miles):

13
Coachman Fundamental Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
Clearwater:

44
Coachman Fundamental Middle:

74

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 669-1190 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 731
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 669-1194
Magnet School.
Principal: David B Rosenberger
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 50
Senate District: 13
School Web Address: http://www.coachman-ms.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

59%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

573
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

43%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 993 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 993 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 308
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 951
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 889

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 948
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 889
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 574 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 574 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 566
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 528

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 565
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 527
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 106
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 298

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

600
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1063 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1063 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 334
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1002
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 925

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1003
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 924
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 622 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 622 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 203
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 549

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 547
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 188
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 331 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 331 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

78%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

61%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

76%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

66%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

597
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

33%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

46%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 978 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 978 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 260
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 921
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 843

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 919
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 840
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 538 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 538 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 466

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 511
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 462
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 307 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 307 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

70%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

636
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

9%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 538 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 538 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 184
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 533
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 533
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 461 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 461 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

87%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

495
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

10%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 544 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 544 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 188
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 542
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 542
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 458 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 458 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 154

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 456
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 456
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

84%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

481
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1481
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

330
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

47%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1637
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1794
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

326
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1927
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

9%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1930
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1690
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

269
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1673
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

253
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

22%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

72%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

264
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1543
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1548
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

45%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

1785
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

26%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1860
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

15%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

14%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

1944
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

38%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

1752
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

52%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1842
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

50%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

37%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

27%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1444
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

1667
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1668
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1860
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1978
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

329
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1724
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1715
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1453
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1593
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1804
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

340
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1846
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1958
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1811
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1867
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 120
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 49%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 346
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 83
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 34%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1537
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

1643
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1700
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1883
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1965
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1755
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1609
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1493
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

342
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1603
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1740
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

348
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1763
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1967
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

339
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1773
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1843
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

125
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

646
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

115
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

109
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

83
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

361
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

70
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

339
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

79
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

271
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

700
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

75
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

53
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

667
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

36
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

45
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

38
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

286
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 272
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

325
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 66%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 78
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

233
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 15%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1877
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1889
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1841
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 48

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1984
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1986
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

1899
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 87

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2053
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2054
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1964
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 90

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1840
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1848
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1798
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1935
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1935
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1856
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 79

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2018
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

2019
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1944
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 75

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 202
Mean Scale Score
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

698
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 84
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 148
Mean Scale Score
Here:

704
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 83
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 186
Mean Scale Score
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

722
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 89
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 202
Mean Scale Score
Here:

701
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 148
Mean Scale Score
COACHMAN FUNDAMENTAL MIDDLE:

713
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 186
Mean Scale Score
Here:

735
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 90
Number Sense (max 9): 8
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 184
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

363
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 88%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 99%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Clearwater, FL
  5. Coachman Fundamental Middle School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2023 Advameg, Inc.