Coleman Middle School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 73.

1724 S MANHATTAN AVE
Tampa, FL 33629

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Terrace Community Middle School (13.8 miles):

92
Coachman Fundamental Middle School (14.2 miles):

74
Coleman Middle School:

73
Hill Middle School (10.8 miles):

58
Pierce Middle School (4.9 miles):

45
Tyrone Middle School (15.8 miles):

36
Hospital/Homebound/Homebased Programs School (7.0 miles):

21
Dropout Prevention School (16.8 miles):

9
Coleman Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Coleman Middle School:

73

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 872-5335 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 921
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 872-5338
Principal: Michael Hoskinson
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 57
Senate District: 16

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

64%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

599
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

34%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 859 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 860 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 320
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 830
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 796

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 829
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 790
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 564 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 549
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 524

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 548
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 520
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 270 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 271 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 256
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 256
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 244
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

628
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 880 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 880 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 274
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 826
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 782

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 822
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 777
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 616 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 616 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 197
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 589
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 555

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 586
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 551
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 256 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

52%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

578
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

65%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

584
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 874 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 873 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 293
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 859
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 858
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 600 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 599 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 207
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 592
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 591
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 181 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

485
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 797 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 797 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 263
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 768
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 768
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 549 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 549 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 177

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 531
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 531
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 43

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 128
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 128
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 53

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 164
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 164
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 46

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 127
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 127
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

469
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1312
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1624
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1541
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1810
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1928
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1957
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2071
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

24%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2183
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

84%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

32%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1395
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1598
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1660
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1745
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

326
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1891
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

75%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1974
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2017
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2066
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

97%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1407
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1590
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1620
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1836
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1889
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1967
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2081
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2085
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1479
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1571
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1638
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1778
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1879
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1978
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2004
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2049
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 126
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 288
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 127
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1425
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1589
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1565
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1752
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1865
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1919
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1787
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1505
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

344
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1569
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1615
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1730
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

323
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1856
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1934
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1918
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

120
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

636
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

118
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

70
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

124
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

661
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

67
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

300
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

678
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

285
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

690
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

74
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

297
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

70
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

76
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

38
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

33
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

686
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

44
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 116
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

284
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 61%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 295
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

296
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 34
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

275
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1808
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

329
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1818
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1788
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 30

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1892
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1897
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1834
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 63

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1977
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

329
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1977
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1912
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1832
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1841
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1785
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 56

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1932
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

342
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1940
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1839
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 100

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1982
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1983
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1909
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 74

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 280
Mean Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

689
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 276
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 278
Mean Scale Score
Here:

710
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 82
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 280
Mean Scale Score
COLEMAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

698
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 83
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 276
Mean Scale Score
Here:

717
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 278
Mean Scale Score
Here:

727
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 277
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

354
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 78%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 20%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 96%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2021 Advameg, Inc.