Crestwood Community Middle School in Royal Palm Beach, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 29.

64 SPARROW DR
Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Bak Middle Of The Arts School (10.0 miles):	94
Highridge Family Center School (10.8 miles):	63
Village Academy On The Art & Sara Jo Kobacker Campus School (19.2 miles):	55
S. D. Spady Elementary School (18.6 miles):	46
Watson B. Duncan Middle School (12.7 miles):	36
Crestwood Community Middle School:	29
Congress Community Middle School (15.0 miles):	26
Bear Lakes Middle School (8.3 miles):	18

Crestwood Community Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Palm Beach County:	45
Royal Palm Beach:	47
Crestwood Community Middle School:	29

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (561) 753-5000 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 1691
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 753-5035
Principal: Karen Whetsell
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 88
Senate District: 28
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Crestwood_MS

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	56%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	51%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	22%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	47%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	51%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	46%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	419
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: D

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	81%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	66%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 4

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 296 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 275

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 275
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 250 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 250 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	63%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	56%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	80%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	24%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	57%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	49%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	441
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	77%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	61%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	63%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	65%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	31%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	56%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	471
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: F

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	69%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	61%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 205 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 205 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 189

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 189
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	71%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	72%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	99%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	51%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	68%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	568
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	34%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1223 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	99%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 404
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1171
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1173
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 537 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 537 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	99%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 185
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 519
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 519
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 242 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 242 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 411 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 411 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	98%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 381
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 382
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	67%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	76%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	455
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	35%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	54%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1251 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1250 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 433
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1199
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1199
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 577 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 577 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 204

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 566
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 566
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 309 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 309 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 111
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 295
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 296
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 79

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 226
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 226
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 446 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 445 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 145

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 418
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 418
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 59

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 69
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 167
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 169
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	62%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	67%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	94%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	70%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	431
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	31%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	50%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1170
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	279
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	34%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	49%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1491
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	54%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1427
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	39%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	1
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1816
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1868
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1952
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	25%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	7%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1737
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	265
State average:	302

Percent Passing

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	25%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	63%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	13%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	49%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	16%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	18%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	55%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	48%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	39%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	11%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	13%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1200
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	27%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1448
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	47%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	8%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	56%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1474
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	41%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	5%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1806
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	73%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1873
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1949
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1806
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	280
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	40%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	53%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	33%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	33%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	2
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1279
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1477
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1508
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1786
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	1857
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	1936
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	254
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1299
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1388
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1452
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1764
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1872
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1932
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 64

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 435

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	3
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 9
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1266
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	294
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1455
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	298
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1488
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1804
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1829
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1913
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	276
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1213
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1395
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	286
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1526
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	1731
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1862
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1947
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	71
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	615
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	45
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	66
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	636
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	55
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	69
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	655
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	62
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	432
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	683
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	74
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	446
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	691
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	75
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	385
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	693
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	69
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	9
State average:	237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	260
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 381

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	337
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	5
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 20%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1765
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1771
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1687
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 85

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1803
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1803
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1733
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 70

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1899
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1894
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1804
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 90

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1719
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	320
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1730
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1682
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 48

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1844
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1850
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1734
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 116

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1931
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1935
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	1838
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 97

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 426

Mean Scale Score

Here:	684
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 384

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 417

Mean Scale Score

Here:	696
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 72
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 426

Mean Scale Score

CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MIDDLE:	680
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 384

Mean Scale Score

Here:	697
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 417

Mean Scale Score

Here:	713
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 418

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	320
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 94%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI