|
Back to: Globe, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 39.
Address: 22 Prickly Pear Dr.
Globe, WI 85501
Grade span: K-8
Schedule: 07:45 AM to 03:45 PM
Principal: Ms. Nancy McLendon
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 425-0925
Fax: (928) 425-0927
Homepage:
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 8
- Grade 4
- Grade 6
- Grade 7
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 92.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| This school: | 93.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2003: 21
Dropout Count In 2005: 5
Enrollment In 2002: 310
Enrollment In 2003: 244
Enrollment In 2004: 252
Enrollment In 2005: 235
Graduation In 2003: 100
Graduation In 2005: 100
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 92.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| This school: | 94.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 78.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 89.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 17.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 6.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 16.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 5.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 16.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 8.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 16.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 5.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2004: No
Made AYP In 2004: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: No
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Made AYP In 2005: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: No
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 3
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 17
All Students Percent Tested: 94%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 16.72% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 55.74% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 747 schools: | 16.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 56.15% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 82%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 840 schools: | 16.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 56.41% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 19.99% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 735 schools: | 22.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 20.36% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 27
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 30.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 4.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 23.28% |
Female Tested: 11
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 45.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 16.43% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 47.77% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 27.03% |
Male Tested: 16
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 16.63% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 18.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 50.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 46.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 23
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 24.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 24
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 20.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 32.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 22.00% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 615 schools: | 14.46% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 23
All Students Percent Tested: 92%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 10.31% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 25.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 59.0% | | State average from 925 schools: | 54.83% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 87%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 24.30% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 56.93% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 86%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 24.05% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 58.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 88%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 35.14% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 46.72% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 33
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 879 schools: | 11.34% |
Female Tested: 20
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 62.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 10.42% |
White Tested: 13
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 680 schools: | 14.66% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 77.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 63.77% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 648 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 28
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 871 schools: | 12.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 27
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 96%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 14.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 4.0% | | State average from 600 schools: | 5.24% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 17
All Students Percent Tested: 94%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 25.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 36.04% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 834 schools: | 30.22% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 26.18% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 36.57% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 30.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 82%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 25.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 866 schools: | 36.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 30.96% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 27
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 30.01% |
Female Tested: 11
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 14.62% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 24.99% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 33.20% |
Male Tested: 16
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 16.25% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 23.57% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 32.66% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 30.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 22
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 96%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 31.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 24
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 20.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 41.0% | | State average from 661 schools: | 30.12% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 19.99% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 88%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 10.99% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 51.29% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 863 schools: | 20.62% |
Female Tested: 12
Female Percent Tested: 80%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 11.33% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 18.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 52.46% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 17
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 81%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 25.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 17.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 53.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 22.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 20
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 83%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 15.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 25.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 50.39% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 10.72% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 33
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Female Tested: 20
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 18.74% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 830 schools: | 19.73% |
White Tested: 13
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 672 schools: | 11.25% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 55.48% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 29.35% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 28
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 27
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 96%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 85%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 19.36% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 24.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 45.50% |
Female Tested: 11
Female Percent Tested: 79%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 17.15% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 24.58% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 47.61% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 92%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 22.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 25.12% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 44.0% | | State average from 785 schools: | 43.42% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 19
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 79%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 18.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 24.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 46.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 13.38% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 22.19% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 51.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 776 schools: | 11.55% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 642 schools: | 11.14% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 11.95% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 590 schools: | 14.44% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 28
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 46.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 12.28% |
Female Tested: 14
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 43.0% | | State average from 774 schools: | 24.29% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 23.51% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 41.36% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 20.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 22.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 37.25% |
White Tested: 15
White Percent Tested: 94%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 14.70% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 19.58% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 48.38% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 635 schools: | 17.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 23
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 30.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 22.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 784 schools: | 13.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 26.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 30.71% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 12.47% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 14
All Students Percent Tested: 82%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 908 schools: | 23.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 90.0% | | State average from 920 schools: | 57.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 11
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 73%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 21.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 88.0% | | State average from 906 schools: | 61.89% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 12
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 32.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 88.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 49.11% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 25
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Female Tested: 12
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 25.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 22.65% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 60.68% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 93%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 69.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 22
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 73.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 23
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 96%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 81%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 12.45% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 5: | 61.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 37.01% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 71%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 40.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 759 schools: | 13.07% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 5: | 33.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 37.27% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 92%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 37.80% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 89.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 37.28% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 75%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 12.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 38.07% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 34.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 13.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 612 schools: | 44.25% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 27
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 74.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 13.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 13.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Female Tested: 14
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 14.20% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 41.56% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 14.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 32.52% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 93%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 89.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 788 schools: | 33.45% |
White Tested: 14
White Percent Tested: 88%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 31.78% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 15.87% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 45.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 23
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 4.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 74.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 21.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 70.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 47.62% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 12.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 10.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 20.07% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 14
All Students Percent Tested: 82%
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 80.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 47.89% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 846 schools: | 20.33% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 11
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 73%
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 75.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 51.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 25.0% | | State average from 835 schools: | 22.65% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 12
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 88.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 45.43% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 622 schools: | 10.58% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 26
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 85.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 19.39% |
Female Tested: 12
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 851 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 83.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 50.29% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.44% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 86.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 22
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 5.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 91.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 21.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 24
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 83.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 9.85% |
Grade 8
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 23
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.74% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 21.13% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 39.95% |
Male Tested: 17
Male Percent Tested: 106%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 28.33% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 20.48% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 416 schools: | 37.73% |
White Tested: 11
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 324 schools: | 14.25% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 338 schools: | 18.16% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 46.88% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 23.55% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 21.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 40.71% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 19.98% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 19.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 43.30% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 511 schools: | 32.52% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 29.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 18.95% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 505 schools: | 34.30% |
Female Tested: 14
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 28.98% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 432 schools: | 19.82% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 36.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 56.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 28.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 25.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 19.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 36.41% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 47.34% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 362 schools: | 20.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 26.22% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 11.41% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 534 schools: | 25.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 533 schools: | 57.36% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 61.28% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 14.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 26.68% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 53.89% |
White Tested: 11
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 13.0% | | State average from 383 schools: | 16.83% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 88.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 67.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 515 schools: | 23.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 73.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 62.13% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 94%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.77% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 45.81% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 385 schools: | 7.21% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 373 schools: | 8.84% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 23.75% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 319 schools: | 6.95% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 418 schools: | 7.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 384 schools: | 8.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 17.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 222 schools: | 2.66% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 17
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 11
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 36.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 45.52% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 5.34% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 9.0% | | State average from 309 schools: | 5.13% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 5.88% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 23
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 38.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 41.22% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 319 schools: | 7.76% |
Male Tested: 17
Male Percent Tested: 106%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 37.74% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 39.95% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 288 schools: | 9.28% |
White Tested: 11
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 337 schools: | 25.47% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 75.0% | | State average from 341 schools: | 44.97% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 36.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 44.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 41.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 313 schools: | 8.18% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 32.42% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 43.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 267 schools: | 8.96% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 508 schools: | 37.65% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 507 schools: | 36.60% |
Female Tested: 14
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 441 schools: | 36.01% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 64.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 38.49% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 492 schools: | 34.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 495 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 370 schools: | 52.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 36.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 33.45% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 23
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 518 schools: | 21.77% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 527 schools: | 18.14% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 530 schools: | 47.74% |
Female Tested: 11
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 20.03% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 19.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 49.54% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 453 schools: | 23.40% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.25% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 46.44% |
White Tested: 11
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 25.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 12.06% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 380 schools: | 14.04% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 55.36% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 19
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 19.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 16.19% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 18.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 51.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 17
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 32.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 19.0% | | State average from 388 schools: | 22.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 391 schools: | 39.93% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 17
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 18.0% | | State average from 555 schools: | 18.93% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 59.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 47.62% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 13.02% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 486 schools: | 17.93% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 490 schools: | 46.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 14.16% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 19.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 19.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 50.60% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 470 schools: | 14.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 11
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 18.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 23.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 402 schools: | 40.55% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 312 schools: | 5.63% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 25
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 829 schools: | 9.06% |
Female Tested: 16
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 10.36% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 845 schools: | 22.62% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 865 schools: | 59.58% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 21
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 4: | 5.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 9.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 4: | 14.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 17.58% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 723 schools: | 32.68% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 47.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 500 schools: | 4.21% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 25
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 24.20% |
Female Tested: 16
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 707 schools: | 11.07% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 17.42% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 49.82% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 24.72% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 21
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 8.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 19.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 26.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 662 schools: | 15.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 23.16% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 48.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 13.53% |
Grade 6
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 18
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 10.96% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 6: | 33.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 25.11% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 60.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 23.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 64.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 6: | 19.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 16.64% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 576 schools: | 34.19% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 582 schools: | 48.54% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 18
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 767 schools: | 18.82% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 19.58% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 46.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 727 schools: | 16.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 14.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 6: | 22.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 19.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 49.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 18.22% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 6: | 38.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 27.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 571 schools: | 24.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 41.04% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 494 schools: | 7.80% |
Grade 7
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 29
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 9.98% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 25.34% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 572 schools: | 58.10% |
Female Tested: 16
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 62.33% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 28.21% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 54.12% |
White Tested: 16
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 310 schools: | 4.44% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 401 schools: | 16.03% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 418 schools: | 68.50% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 25
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 7.29% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 23.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 62.28% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 47.98% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 22.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 34.65% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 29
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 15.30% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 17.48% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 570 schools: | 52.46% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 15.45% |
Female Tested: 16
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 13.23% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Grade 7: | 44.0% | | State average from 466 schools: | 17.55% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 54.67% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 17.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 69.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 50.48% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 15.81% |
White Tested: 16
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards:
| Grade 7: | 19.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 11.96% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 416 schools: | 57.83% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 384 schools: | 23.96% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 25
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 11.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 542 schools: | 16.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 60.0% | | State average from 559 schools: | 55.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 500 schools: | 16.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 408 schools: | 23.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 47.75% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 7: | 4.0% | | State average from 339 schools: | 6.92% |
|