Doral Middle School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 68.

5005 NW 112 AVE
Miami, FL 33165

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (8.8 miles):

98
South Pointe Elementary School (15.1 miles):

74
Doral Middle School:

68
Ben Sheppard Annex School (12.2 miles):

63
Centennial Middle School (10.7 miles):

47
Howard A. Doolin Middle School (4.3 miles):

33
Hialeah Middle School (12.8 miles):

19
Downtown Miami Charter School (11.6 miles):

7
Alpha Middle School (10.0 miles):

0
Doral Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Doral Middle School:

68

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Miami, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 592-2822 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6151
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 597-3853
Principal: Tatiana M De Miranda
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 114
Senate District: 38
School Web Address: http://doral.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

56%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

617
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 830 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 830 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 323
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 765
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 733

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 765
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 732
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 703 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 703 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 280
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 643
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 619

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 643
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 618
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 420 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 420 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 160
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 387
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 374

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 387
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 373
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

602
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1110 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 524
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1026
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 975

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1024
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 973
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 954 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 953 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 453
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 875
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 832

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 873
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 830
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 427 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 427 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 190
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 399
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 381

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 397
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 379
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

54%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

600
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1261 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1261 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 449
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1187
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1098

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1098
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1091 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1091 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 387
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1029
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 947

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1029
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 947
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 437 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 437 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 157
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 402
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 402
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 323 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 285
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 285
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 238
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

550
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1408 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1410 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 428
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1327
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1330
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1195 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1196 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 359
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1121
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1122
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 448 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 449 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 135
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 412
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 413
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 412 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 412 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 365
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 365
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

463
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

38%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1538 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1537 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 398
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1456
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1456
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 41

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 141
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 141
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1307 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1306 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 332

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1237
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1237
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 577 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 576 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 143

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 550
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 550
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 445 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 445 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 80

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 404
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 404
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 78

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

440
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1783
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

28%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1895
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

334
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1924
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1737
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1882
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1958
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1780
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1835
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1937
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1748
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1954
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 536
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1713
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1830
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1899
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

317
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1690
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1875
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1943
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

261
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

67
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

534
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

690
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

74
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

476
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

693
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 470
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

308
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1730
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1777
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1713
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1803
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

316
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1830
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1768
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 63

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1881
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DORAL MIDDLE SCHOOL:

309
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1900
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1824
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 76

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1714
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1744
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1716
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 28

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1861
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1872
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1743
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 130

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1934
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1942
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1864
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 78

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 507
Mean Scale Score
Here:

681
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 72
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 450
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 452
Mean Scale Score
Here:

691
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 507
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 450
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 452
Mean Scale Score
Here:

709
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 451
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

300
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 94%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2017 Advameg, Inc.