All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Reno, NV Double Diamond Elementary School in Reno, Nevada (NV)
Double Diamond Elementary School in Reno, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
67 .
Address:
1200 S. Meadows Parkway
Principal: Kent Vallier
Phone Number (Verify before using): (775) 850-6212
Fax Number (Verify before using): (775) 850-6215
Website: www.washoe.k12.nv.us
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Adequate
Special Programs: Homework Help Centers: No
Other nearby schools ratings: Double Diamond Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Washoe County:
47Reno:
46Double Diamond Elementary School:
67
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
100.0%Asian:
100.0%Hispanic:
100.0%White:
100.0%Two or more Races:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient Asian:
90.9%White:
84.5%All Students:
80.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
71.2%Hispanic:
69.4%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
69.3%Individual Education Plan Students:
57.6%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
100.0%Asian:
100.0%Hispanic:
100.0%White:
100.0%Two or more Races:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient Asian:
78.6%White:
75.2%All Students:
70.5%Hispanic:
57.4%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
48.6%Limited English Proficiency Students:
48.1%Individual Education Plan Students:
43.6%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
Two or more Races:
96.9%Asian:
96.9%Limited English Proficiency Students:
96.2%Hispanic:
96.0%All Students:
96.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
95.9%White:
95.7%Black:
95.2%American Indian:
95.1%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
94.9%Pacific Islander:
93.6%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 8.8% 1.9% 12.6% 13.8% 38.9% 44.7% 35.8% 34.4% 12.6% 7.1% Male 48 -4.2% -5.7% 16.7% 18.1% 47.9% 48.0% 29.2% 29.5% 6.3% 4.4% Female 47 22.1% 9.7% 8.5% 9.4% 29.8% 41.3% 42.6% 39.5% 19.1% 9.7% Asian 10 20.4% 15.6% 10.0% 7.2% 30.0% 37.6% 30.0% 44.2% 30.0% 11.0% Hispanic 14 -3.9% -10.6% 7.1% 20.9% 57.1% 50.1% 28.6% 25.8% 7.1% 3.2% White 63 12.8% 11.0% 12.7% 8.6% 34.9% 40.8% 39.7% 40.7% 12.7% 10.0% Individual Education Plan Students 18 -28.5% -25.5% 33.3% 40.5% 55.6% 45.4% 11.1% 12.3% 0.0% 1.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 13 -8.8% -14.1% 7.7% 23.5% 61.5% 51.0% 30.8% 23.0% 0.0% 2.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 -10.2% -10.0% 23.5% 20.0% 47.1% 50.3% 23.5% 26.3% 5.9% 3.3% Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 100 13.5% 12.1% 19.0% 16.2% 40.0% 44.1% 33.0% 32.9% 8.0% 6.7% Male 49 9.2% 4.2% 18.4% 21.3% 44.9% 47.1% 30.6% 27.4% 6.1% 4.3% Female 51 17.6% 20.6% 19.6% 10.9% 35.3% 41.0% 35.3% 38.8% 9.8% 9.3% Hispanic 22 -0.2% 0.3% 13.6% 23.9% 59.1% 48.3% 27.3% 24.8% 0.0% 3.0% White 59 20.0% 20.5% 16.9% 10.5% 35.6% 41.4% 37.3% 38.8% 10.2% 9.2% Individual Education Plan Students 18 -16.4% -14.6% 55.6% 46.5% 33.3% 40.5% 11.1% 11.7% 0.0% 1.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 15 12.5% -3.6% 20.0% 27.4% 40.0% 48.7% 33.3% 21.5% 6.7% 2.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 3.3% 0.4% 23.1% 23.1% 46.2% 49.0% 25.6% 24.9% 5.1% 3.1% Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 5 Students Tested: 101
Double Diamond Elementary School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
3.0%State:
7.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
4.0%State:
4.5%
Double Diamond Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : State :
Male
This School : Nevada :
Hispanic
This School : Nevada :
White
Here : Nevada :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : State :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 101 -8.3% -18.6% 3.0% 7.3% 41.6% 47.5% 51.5% 40.7% 4.0% 4.5% Male 59 -16.4% -26.3% 5.1% 10.2% 47.5% 52.3% 45.8% 34.5% 1.7% 3.0% Female 42 2.9% -10.3% 0.0% 4.2% 33.3% 42.3% 59.5% 47.3% 7.1% 6.2% Hispanic 22 -36.5% -27.2% 9.1% 9.3% 63.6% 54.0% 22.7% 34.3% 4.6% 2.3% White 72 -2.7% -10.3% 1.4% 5.2% 37.5% 41.3% 58.3% 47.0% 2.8% 6.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 35 -38.1% -28.2% 5.7% 10.2% 68.6% 54.2% 25.7% 33.4% 0.0% 2.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 110 -6.0% -17.2% 3.7% 7.7% 38.5% 45.7% 47.7% 41.9% 10.1% 4.7% Male 53 -9.1% -25.2% 3.8% 10.6% 41.5% 50.8% 45.3% 35.6% 9.4% 2.9% Female 57 -3.1% -8.8% 3.6% 4.7% 35.7% 40.3% 50.0% 48.5% 10.7% 6.5% Asian 17 6.8% -1.8% 0.0% 3.8% 29.4% 34.2% 47.1% 52.7% 23.5% 9.3% Hispanic 22 -32.0% -26.4% 4.5% 9.7% 63.6% 52.9% 31.8% 35.0% 0.0% 2.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -53.8% -44.1% 0.0% 17.6% 90.0% 62.8% 10.0% 19.3% 0.0% 0.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 -32.2% -27.2% 5.3% 10.8% 63.2% 52.6% 26.3% 34.3% 5.3% 2.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 127 4.2% -4.9% 7.1% 8.9% 37.0% 44.3% 40.2% 40.4% 15.7% 6.4% Male 51 -14.4% -13.2% 13.7% 12.5% 49.0% 49.0% 33.3% 34.4% 3.9% 4.1% Female 76 16.7% 3.8% 2.6% 5.2% 28.9% 39.3% 44.7% 46.7% 23.7% 8.8% Asian 20 8.3% 10.1% 10.0% 5.4% 30.0% 32.8% 35.0% 49.4% 25.0% 12.5% Hispanic 17 -16.4% -13.8% 11.8% 11.3% 52.9% 50.8% 23.5% 34.9% 11.8% 3.1% Individual Education Plan Students 11 -24.4% -38.9% 27.3% 36.4% 45.5% 50.8% 9.1% 12.0% 18.2% 0.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 -25.9% -15.5% 22.6% 12.6% 51.6% 51.2% 19.4% 33.2% 6.5% 3.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 -3.3% -7.5% 8.4% 9.8% 43.2% 46.0% 37.9% 38.8% 10.5% 5.3% Male 47 -13.4% -15.5% 8.5% 13.3% 53.2% 50.5% 36.2% 32.8% 2.1% 3.3% Female 47 5.7% 0.9% 8.5% 6.2% 34.0% 41.3% 40.4% 45.1% 17.0% 7.4% Asian 12 -10.0% 6.4% 0.0% 5.2% 58.3% 36.7% 33.3% 48.0% 8.3% 10.1% Hispanic 13 -13.2% -18.0% 7.7% 13.8% 53.8% 52.5% 23.1% 31.2% 15.4% 2.5% Individual Education Plan Students 11 -42.6% -38.3% 27.3% 38.2% 63.6% 48.4% 9.1% 12.6% 0.0% 0.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 -16.2% -19.0% 16.1% 14.3% 48.4% 53.0% 25.8% 30.5% 9.7% 2.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 102 26.1% 8.1% 2.9% 10.3% 31.4% 42.0% 48.0% 40.1% 17.6% 7.6% Male 50 16.4% -0.1% 6.0% 13.9% 38.0% 46.6% 50.0% 34.5% 6.0% 5.0% Female 52 35.4% 16.8% 0.0% 6.5% 25.0% 37.1% 46.2% 46.1% 28.8% 10.4% Asian 12 18.7% 22.0% 0.0% 5.2% 41.7% 33.2% 25.0% 48.1% 33.3% 13.5% Hispanic 14 10.4% -3.3% 14.3% 14.5% 35.7% 49.2% 42.9% 32.8% 7.1% 3.5% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -19.6% -23.9% 30.0% 37.6% 50.0% 46.7% 10.0% 14.2% 10.0% 1.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 3.3% -3.5% 14.3% 15.0% 42.9% 48.9% 28.6% 32.8% 14.3% 3.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 90 27.1% 5.3% 7.8% 11.1% 25.6% 44.0% 57.8% 38.4% 8.9% 6.5% Male 45 11.5% -2.4% 15.6% 14.8% 33.3% 48.0% 44.4% 33.1% 6.7% 4.1% Female 45 42.6% 13.2% 0.0% 7.3% 17.8% 40.0% 71.1% 43.9% 11.1% 8.9% Asian 10 30.4% 18.1% 10.0% 5.2% 20.0% 37.1% 30.0% 46.2% 40.0% 11.5% Hispanic 22 10.4% -6.4% 9.1% 16.0% 40.9% 50.8% 45.5% 30.2% 4.5% 3.0% White 50 32.4% 14.8% 8.0% 7.1% 20.0% 38.5% 68.0% 45.3% 4.0% 9.1% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -39.6% -25.8% 50.0% 40.0% 50.0% 46.3% 0.0% 12.8% 0.0% 1.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 22.5% -7.2% 10.3% 16.4% 27.6% 51.2% 55.2% 29.8% 6.9% 2.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 3 Students Tested: 138
This School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
5.8%State:
10.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
41.3%State:
37.5%
Double Diamond Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 138 13.1% 3.5% 5.8% 10.3% 15.2% 20.3% 37.7% 31.9% 41.3% 37.5% Male 79 11.3% 3.8% 5.1% 11.1% 17.7% 19.2% 35.4% 30.7% 41.8% 39.0% Female 59 15.5% 3.2% 6.8% 9.5% 11.9% 21.5% 40.7% 33.1% 40.7% 36.0% Asian 14 19.8% 17.9% 0.0% 3.5% 14.3% 12.8% 28.6% 27.6% 57.1% 56.2% Hispanic 32 -0.3% -2.7% 15.6% 12.5% 18.8% 24.3% 43.8% 33.0% 21.9% 30.2% White 79 17.6% 13.5% 3.8% 6.0% 12.7% 14.6% 35.4% 31.5% 48.1% 47.8% Individual Education Plan Students 14 -23.0% -23.7% 21.4% 30.4% 35.7% 27.4% 28.6% 23.4% 14.3% 18.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 19 13.1% -5.4% 5.3% 13.8% 15.8% 25.8% 47.4% 32.0% 31.6% 28.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 40 4.1% -4.6% 15.0% 13.9% 15.0% 24.8% 40.0% 32.6% 30.0% 28.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 142 12.3% 0.4% 4.9% 11.5% 16.9% 22.2% 38.0% 34.9% 40.1% 31.4% Male 76 13.0% 0.7% 6.6% 11.6% 14.5% 21.7% 36.8% 33.9% 42.1% 32.8% Female 66 11.4% 0.1% 3.0% 11.3% 19.7% 22.7% 39.4% 35.9% 37.9% 30.0% Asian 18 23.0% 13.3% 0.0% 5.7% 11.1% 15.1% 33.3% 32.5% 55.6% 46.6% Hispanic 30 -5.9% -6.3% 3.3% 14.1% 36.7% 26.4% 30.0% 35.7% 30.0% 23.9% Black 13 11.0% -17.1% 15.4% 22.8% 7.7% 28.4% 38.5% 30.3% 38.5% 18.4% White 77 17.2% 9.8% 5.2% 6.9% 11.7% 17.5% 41.6% 35.9% 41.6% 39.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -8.0% -10.5% 5.3% 15.8% 36.8% 28.7% 26.3% 35.5% 31.6% 19.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 46 -0.7% -8.4% 10.9% 15.5% 23.9% 26.9% 34.8% 34.5% 30.4% 23.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 117 -5.9% 4.2% 3.4% 6.5% 46.2% 33.0% 27.4% 31.3% 23.1% 29.2% Male 64 -6.3% 6.0% 3.1% 6.6% 46.9% 31.0% 28.1% 31.3% 21.9% 31.1% Female 53 -5.4% 2.2% 3.8% 6.4% 45.3% 35.1% 26.4% 31.3% 24.5% 27.2% Asian 17 2.5% 17.1% 5.9% 3.4% 35.3% 23.2% 41.2% 32.7% 17.6% 40.7% Hispanic 26 -29.4% -4.0% 0.0% 8.1% 73.1% 39.6% 19.2% 30.3% 7.7% 22.0% White 69 3.1% 14.7% 1.4% 3.7% 39.1% 25.3% 27.5% 33.2% 31.9% 37.8% Individual Education Plan Students 17 -15.1% -22.6% 11.8% 22.2% 47.1% 44.1% 29.4% 20.6% 11.8% 13.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 15 -43.0% -8.6% 0.0% 9.2% 86.7% 43.1% 13.3% 29.8% 0.0% 17.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 28 -24.2% -5.3% 3.6% 9.2% 64.3% 39.8% 32.1% 29.9% 0.0% 21.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 98 2.5% 3.6% 3.1% 8.3% 38.1% 31.7% 36.1% 35.6% 22.7% 24.4% Male 54 -1.6% 4.0% 3.8% 8.6% 41.5% 31.1% 37.7% 34.8% 17.0% 25.4% Female 44 7.3% 3.3% 2.3% 8.0% 34.1% 32.4% 34.1% 36.3% 29.5% 23.2% Asian 13 -2.5% 17.3% 0.0% 3.9% 46.2% 22.5% 30.8% 36.4% 23.1% 37.2% Hispanic 21 -23.0% -5.3% 9.5% 10.4% 57.1% 38.6% 19.0% 34.5% 14.3% 16.5% White 55 12.8% 13.8% 1.8% 5.0% 29.1% 24.9% 40.0% 37.5% 29.1% 32.6% Individual Education Plan Students 14 -33.2% -23.5% 7.7% 25.9% 69.2% 41.3% 15.4% 21.9% 7.7% 11.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 18 -17.4% -9.2% 0.0% 12.0% 61.1% 41.0% 27.8% 33.6% 11.1% 13.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 -24.0% -6.7% 3.2% 12.0% 64.5% 38.4% 19.4% 33.6% 12.9% 16.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 131 17.8% 12.4% 9.2% 8.8% 29.8% 35.5% 33.6% 33.7% 27.5% 22.1% Male 48 15.0% 13.0% 16.7% 9.6% 25.0% 34.2% 33.3% 32.6% 25.0% 23.7% Female 83 19.4% 11.9% 4.8% 8.0% 32.5% 36.9% 33.7% 34.8% 28.9% 20.3% Asian 16 31.7% 26.3% 6.3% 3.9% 18.8% 26.5% 31.3% 35.9% 43.8% 33.6% Hispanic 22 6.7% 3.1% 9.1% 11.3% 40.9% 42.3% 27.3% 31.6% 22.7% 14.8% White 79 18.7% 23.4% 10.1% 5.0% 27.8% 28.3% 35.4% 36.8% 26.6% 30.0% Individual Education Plan Students 15 -36.6% -12.3% 20.0% 25.8% 73.3% 43.1% 6.7% 19.4% 0.0% 11.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 15 -3.3% -3.5% 20.0% 13.7% 40.0% 46.6% 26.7% 28.4% 13.3% 11.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 37 10.8% 2.2% 16.2% 12.3% 29.7% 42.2% 40.5% 31.2% 13.5% 14.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 10.7% 5.1% 5.7% 10.8% 38.2% 38.7% 35.8% 32.2% 20.3% 18.3% Male 66 9.1% 5.6% 4.5% 11.5% 40.9% 37.6% 34.8% 32.0% 19.7% 18.9% Female 57 12.5% 4.7% 7.0% 10.1% 35.1% 39.8% 36.8% 32.4% 21.1% 17.7% Asian 11 9.1% 18.9% 9.1% 5.7% 36.4% 30.0% 45.5% 36.8% 9.1% 27.5% Hispanic 18 -1.0% -6.7% 5.6% 14.5% 50.0% 46.8% 22.2% 27.8% 22.2% 10.9% Black 10 -25.4% -11.5% 20.0% 20.6% 60.0% 45.5% 20.0% 24.9% 0.0% 9.0% White 79 20.4% 17.4% 2.5% 6.0% 31.6% 31.2% 41.8% 37.2% 24.1% 25.6% Individual Education Plan Students 18 -1.0% -17.8% 11.1% 28.4% 44.4% 44.0% 38.9% 18.9% 5.6% 8.7% Limited English Proficiency Students 15 -25.4% -15.4% 13.3% 18.1% 66.7% 51.9% 13.3% 23.1% 6.7% 6.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 -6.7% -7.6% 9.7% 15.7% 51.6% 46.5% 35.5% 27.2% 3.2% 10.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 108 19.4% 5.6% 3.7% 11.8% 31.5% 37.3% 36.1% 28.4% 28.7% 22.6% Male 60 21.3% 7.5% 5.0% 11.9% 28.3% 35.2% 38.3% 28.2% 28.3% 24.6% Female 48 17.1% 3.9% 2.1% 11.4% 35.4% 39.3% 33.3% 28.6% 29.2% 20.7% Asian 11 45.5% 20.6% 0.0% 5.6% 9.1% 28.4% 27.3% 33.3% 63.6% 32.7% Hispanic 15 -5.4% -7.0% 6.7% 16.1% 53.3% 45.5% 26.7% 25.6% 13.3% 12.9% White 74 22.2% 17.6% 2.7% 6.9% 29.7% 30.1% 40.5% 31.6% 27.0% 31.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 36 -3.7% -7.2% 2.8% 16.9% 55.6% 45.0% 30.6% 25.1% 11.1% 13.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 83 17.3% 10.4% 7.2% 12.3% 41.0% 42.7% 24.1% 24.5% 27.7% 20.4% Male 45 14.4% 11.8% 8.9% 13.1% 42.2% 40.6% 20.0% 24.7% 28.9% 21.6% Female 38 20.8% 9.1% 5.3% 11.5% 39.5% 44.9% 28.9% 24.3% 26.3% 19.3% Hispanic 12 7.2% -2.9% 16.7% 17.8% 41.7% 50.6% 33.3% 19.9% 8.3% 11.6% White 59 19.7% 22.2% 3.4% 7.0% 42.4% 36.3% 25.4% 28.8% 28.8% 28.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -14.5% -12.4% 10.0% 22.5% 70.0% 55.4% 20.0% 15.8% 0.0% 6.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 15.5% -2.6% 19.2% 17.7% 30.8% 50.4% 23.1% 20.2% 26.9% 11.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 4 Students Tested: 147
This School:
100.0%State:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
18.4%State:
23.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
21.1%Nevada:
14.1%
Double Diamond Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective All Students This School:
12.3%Nevada:
3.6%
Female This School:
8.0%Nevada:
4.0%
Asian This School:
26.4%Nevada:
19.4%
Hispanic
This School : State :
White This School:
12.2%State:
12.5%
Two or more Races This School:
24.1%Nevada:
9.6%
Individual Education Plan Students
Here : Nevada :
Limited English Proficiency Students
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 147 12.3% 3.6% 3.4% 7.2% 18.4% 23.3% 57.1% 55.4% 21.1% 14.1% Male 78 16.2% 3.2% 2.6% 7.7% 15.4% 23.3% 61.5% 55.0% 20.5% 14.1% Female 69 8.0% 4.0% 4.4% 6.6% 21.7% 23.4% 52.2% 55.9% 21.7% 14.1% Asian 13 26.4% 19.4% 0.0% 2.5% 7.7% 12.3% 46.2% 56.8% 46.2% 28.5% Hispanic 41 2.4% -3.0% 4.9% 8.8% 26.8% 28.2% 61.0% 53.9% 7.3% 9.0% White 73 12.2% 12.5% 4.1% 4.2% 17.8% 17.5% 50.7% 58.9% 27.4% 19.5% Two or more Races 10 24.1% 9.6% 0.0% 5.4% 10.0% 19.2% 70.0% 57.6% 20.0% 17.9% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -15.9% -25.9% 8.3% 24.5% 41.7% 35.4% 50.0% 35.3% 0.0% 4.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -13.3% -5.3% 5.3% 9.8% 42.1% 29.6% 47.4% 52.1% 5.3% 8.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 44 -2.3% -4.5% 6.8% 9.9% 29.6% 28.7% 56.8% 52.8% 6.8% 8.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 126 13.5% 0.5% 2.4% 8.0% 18.3% 25.6% 57.9% 57.5% 21.4% 8.9% Male 74 13.8% -0.3% 1.4% 8.5% 18.9% 25.9% 58.1% 56.2% 21.6% 9.5% Female 52 12.9% 1.3% 3.8% 7.5% 17.3% 25.2% 57.7% 58.9% 21.2% 8.4% Asian 15 14.1% 13.0% 0.0% 4.0% 20.0% 17.1% 60.0% 62.1% 20.0% 16.8% Hispanic 29 -3.8% -6.8% 6.9% 9.6% 31.0% 31.3% 55.2% 53.9% 6.9% 5.2% White 80 20.4% 9.8% 1.3% 5.0% 12.5% 19.3% 58.8% 62.9% 27.5% 12.8% Individual Education Plan Students 14 -23.0% -30.1% 7.1% 26.0% 50.0% 38.2% 35.7% 32.9% 7.1% 2.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 23 -5.0% -17.1% 8.7% 13.1% 30.4% 38.2% 56.5% 46.5% 4.3% 2.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 42 0.8% -9.1% 4.8% 11.4% 28.6% 31.9% 52.4% 51.8% 14.3% 5.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 102 3.1% 8.0% 9.9% 8.1% 30.7% 27.6% 30.7% 32.4% 28.7% 31.9% Male 51 5.7% 7.6% 8.0% 8.4% 30.0% 27.7% 40.0% 32.1% 22.0% 31.8% Female 51 0.6% 8.3% 11.8% 7.8% 31.4% 27.6% 21.6% 32.7% 35.3% 32.0% Asian 15 -3.0% 23.2% 0.0% 3.4% 46.7% 17.1% 20.0% 32.2% 33.3% 47.3% Hispanic 17 -3.4% 0.0% 23.5% 10.3% 23.5% 33.4% 29.4% 32.4% 23.5% 23.9% White 60 6.4% 17.0% 6.8% 4.9% 30.5% 21.8% 33.9% 32.9% 28.8% 40.5% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -39.6% -22.2% 50.0% 27.9% 33.3% 38.1% 16.7% 22.2% 0.0% 11.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 -6.3% -1.7% 16.7% 11.4% 33.3% 34.0% 40.0% 31.7% 10.0% 22.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 116 13.5% 9.9% 3.4% 9.3% 26.7% 24.5% 38.8% 38.7% 31.0% 27.4% Male 49 7.0% 9.5% 4.1% 10.2% 32.7% 24.0% 36.7% 38.1% 26.5% 27.7% Female 67 18.3% 10.3% 3.0% 8.4% 22.4% 25.1% 40.3% 39.4% 34.3% 27.2% Asian 15 17.0% 23.2% 0.0% 3.9% 26.7% 16.6% 40.0% 36.7% 33.3% 42.8% Hispanic 17 -15.1% 2.1% 5.9% 11.8% 52.9% 29.8% 23.5% 38.8% 17.6% 19.6% White 70 20.8% 19.0% 2.9% 5.7% 20.0% 19.0% 41.4% 39.8% 35.7% 35.5% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -39.6% -19.7% 16.7% 30.0% 66.7% 33.5% 0.0% 25.6% 16.7% 11.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 3.7% -0.1% 10.0% 13.3% 30.0% 30.5% 40.0% 37.5% 20.0% 18.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 116 23.9% 21.0% 10.3% 9.9% 22.4% 25.8% 45.7% 35.6% 21.6% 28.7% Male 63 21.8% 20.3% 15.9% 10.8% 19.0% 25.6% 46.0% 34.6% 19.0% 29.0% Female 53 26.5% 21.8% 3.8% 8.9% 26.4% 26.0% 45.3% 36.7% 24.5% 28.4% Asian 15 30.0% 34.9% 6.7% 4.7% 20.0% 17.1% 53.3% 34.8% 20.0% 43.4% Hispanic 19 9.3% 11.5% 15.8% 13.4% 31.6% 31.8% 47.4% 35.0% 5.3% 19.7% White 71 28.5% 31.5% 7.0% 5.3% 21.1% 19.8% 43.7% 37.3% 28.2% 37.5% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -12.5% -8.5% 38.5% 29.9% 30.8% 35.3% 30.8% 23.3% 0.0% 11.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 13 -12.5% -1.2% 38.5% 18.9% 30.8% 38.9% 30.8% 30.7% 0.0% 11.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 1.4% 10.4% 23.7% 14.5% 31.6% 31.8% 36.8% 34.8% 7.9% 18.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 5
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
9.2%State:
16.4%
Exceeds Standard This School:
13.9%Nevada:
5.2%
Double Diamond Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 130 16.4% 3.3% 9.2% 16.4% 8.5% 14.5% 68.5% 64.0% 13.9% 5.2% Male 79 16.4% 1.9% 8.9% 17.3% 8.9% 14.9% 63.3% 62.4% 19.0% 5.4% Female 51 16.5% 4.8% 9.8% 15.3% 7.8% 14.0% 76.5% 65.8% 5.9% 4.8% Hispanic 30 10.8% -2.0% 13.3% 19.5% 10.0% 16.5% 63.3% 60.5% 13.3% 3.5% White 79 24.0% 11.0% 3.8% 10.7% 6.3% 12.3% 76.0% 70.0% 13.9% 6.9% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -32.6% -32.4% 41.7% 47.5% 25.0% 19.1% 25.0% 32.5% 8.3% 1.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 11 6.8% -4.4% 18.2% 21.7% 9.1% 16.8% 72.7% 58.1% 0.0% 3.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 44 9.1% -4.5% 13.6% 21.7% 11.4% 16.9% 70.5% 58.3% 4.6% 3.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 109 18.5% 0.6% 6.4% 16.2% 9.2% 17.3% 68.8% 60.4% 15.6% 6.1% Male 52 18.7% -0.6% 3.8% 17.3% 11.5% 17.4% 69.2% 59.0% 15.4% 6.3% Female 57 18.3% 1.8% 8.8% 15.0% 7.0% 17.2% 68.4% 61.8% 15.8% 5.9% Asian 17 16.5% 14.4% 5.9% 8.0% 11.8% 11.7% 64.7% 67.9% 17.6% 12.4% Hispanic 22 11.4% -6.2% 4.5% 19.9% 18.2% 20.5% 63.6% 56.3% 13.6% 3.4% White 59 23.9% 9.3% 6.8% 10.8% 3.4% 14.0% 72.9% 66.7% 16.9% 8.5% Individual Education Plan Students 11 -2.3% -33.4% 27.3% 45.6% 9.1% 21.9% 63.6% 31.1% 0.0% 1.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -2.3% -22.7% 9.1% 31.1% 27.3% 25.7% 54.5% 42.1% 9.1% 1.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 0.8% -8.5% 15.4% 21.7% 17.9% 20.9% 53.8% 54.0% 12.8% 3.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 129 8.8% 5.9% 0.8% 4.0% 34.1% 33.8% 41.9% 45.7% 23.3% 16.5% Male 50 1.7% 4.7% 2.0% 4.8% 40.0% 34.2% 38.0% 44.8% 20.0% 16.3% Female 79 13.3% 7.1% 0.0% 3.3% 30.4% 33.3% 44.3% 46.6% 25.3% 16.8% Asian 21 15.1% 19.8% 0.0% 1.7% 28.6% 22.3% 42.9% 47.8% 28.6% 28.2% Hispanic 17 -21.0% -2.7% 0.0% 5.3% 64.7% 41.1% 23.5% 42.4% 11.8% 11.2% White 78 15.5% 16.0% 0.0% 2.1% 28.2% 25.5% 47.4% 50.4% 24.4% 21.9% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -31.3% -29.4% 8.3% 17.3% 66.7% 55.8% 8.3% 22.5% 16.7% 4.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -23.0% -4.5% 3.0% 5.8% 63.6% 42.5% 33.3% 41.2% 0.0% 10.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 19.2% 5.3% 4.3% 5.9% 20.2% 32.5% 57.4% 48.4% 18.1% 13.2% Male 50 17.7% 4.4% 2.0% 6.6% 24.0% 32.6% 60.0% 47.6% 14.0% 13.1% Female 45 21.0% 6.2% 6.8% 5.1% 15.9% 32.5% 54.5% 49.3% 22.7% 13.2% Asian 12 27.0% 19.0% 8.3% 2.6% 8.3% 22.2% 58.3% 51.8% 25.0% 23.4% Hispanic 13 -2.5% -3.9% 0.0% 7.7% 46.2% 39.9% 38.5% 44.3% 15.4% 8.2% White 62 22.4% 15.5% 3.3% 3.5% 18.0% 24.7% 60.7% 54.1% 18.0% 17.7% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -10.1% -30.4% 15.4% 23.7% 38.5% 50.4% 46.2% 22.5% 0.0% 3.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 27 1.4% -5.1% 11.5% 8.5% 30.8% 40.3% 30.8% 43.5% 26.9% 7.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 101 31.0% 15.1% 5.9% 6.7% 19.8% 34.8% 63.4% 46.9% 10.9% 11.6% Male 49 30.2% 14.1% 10.2% 7.9% 16.3% 34.8% 59.2% 45.9% 14.3% 11.5% Female 52 31.7% 16.3% 1.9% 5.5% 23.1% 34.9% 67.3% 47.9% 7.7% 11.7% Asian 12 31.7% 29.6% 0.0% 3.4% 25.0% 23.7% 50.0% 53.0% 25.0% 19.9% Hispanic 14 6.7% 4.8% 14.3% 9.0% 35.7% 42.9% 35.7% 41.4% 14.3% 6.7% White 68 37.6% 26.5% 4.4% 3.7% 14.7% 26.6% 72.1% 53.6% 8.8% 16.1% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -26.6% -19.8% 25.0% 24.8% 58.3% 51.8% 16.7% 20.8% 0.0% 2.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 -5.2% 3.3% 19.0% 9.8% 42.9% 43.6% 33.3% 40.4% 4.8% 6.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 91 24.9% 9.3% 1.1% 8.2% 28.6% 37.2% 47.3% 41.5% 23.1% 13.2% Male 46 22.0% 7.9% 2.2% 9.2% 30.4% 37.6% 41.3% 40.9% 26.1% 12.4% Female 45 27.9% 10.7% 0.0% 7.2% 26.7% 36.7% 53.3% 42.0% 20.0% 14.1% Asian 10 34.6% 24.4% 0.0% 3.5% 20.0% 26.7% 20.0% 47.2% 60.0% 22.6% Hispanic 22 27.3% -2.0% 0.0% 10.6% 27.3% 46.0% 50.0% 36.1% 22.7% 7.3% White 51 25.2% 20.8% 2.0% 5.0% 27.5% 28.9% 54.9% 47.7% 15.7% 18.5% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -30.0% -24.6% 7.7% 29.6% 76.9% 49.6% 15.4% 18.1% 0.0% 2.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 11.3% -4.3% 3.3% 12.2% 40.0% 46.7% 40.0% 34.5% 16.7% 6.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 110 10.1% 5.1% 7.3% 9.2% 37.3% 40.3% 39.1% 38.1% 16.4% 12.4% Male 58 4.6% 3.8% 3.4% 10.8% 46.6% 40.0% 34.5% 37.1% 15.5% 12.1% Female 52 16.1% 6.7% 11.5% 7.5% 26.9% 40.4% 44.2% 39.3% 17.3% 12.7% Hispanic 23 -10.6% -8.3% 13.0% 12.6% 52.2% 50.4% 26.1% 31.2% 8.7% 5.9% White 71 16.6% 17.5% 4.2% 5.5% 33.8% 31.7% 40.8% 44.7% 21.1% 18.1% Individual Education Plan Students 21 -40.6% -27.4% 28.6% 32.2% 66.7% 49.7% 4.8% 15.2% 0.0% 2.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -35.4% -23.4% 20.0% 18.5% 70.0% 59.4% 10.0% 19.8% 0.0% 2.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 -10.9% -8.8% 13.8% 13.6% 51.7% 49.8% 34.5% 30.6% 0.0% 6.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 37.1% 15.2% 2.1% 8.4% 26.3% 41.9% 51.6% 39.7% 20.0% 10.0% Male 47 44.2% 13.3% 2.1% 9.7% 19.1% 42.4% 61.7% 37.6% 17.0% 10.2% Female 47 29.3% 17.3% 2.1% 6.8% 34.0% 41.4% 40.4% 41.9% 23.4% 9.9% Hispanic 14 22.6% 2.5% 0.0% 11.2% 42.9% 51.8% 57.1% 32.5% 0.0% 4.5% White 63 41.7% 26.1% 1.6% 5.2% 22.2% 34.2% 58.7% 46.3% 17.5% 14.3% Individual Education Plan Students 13 11.7% -18.0% 15.4% 31.4% 38.5% 52.1% 38.5% 14.1% 7.7% 2.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 6.9% 2.2% 3.4% 12.4% 55.2% 50.9% 27.6% 32.2% 13.8% 4.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 6 Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 96 27.6% 12.3% 3.1% 8.9% 14.6% 24.2% 47.9% 42.2% 34.4% 24.7% Male 49 24.9% 10.9% 4.1% 10.3% 16.3% 24.1% 51.0% 40.3% 28.6% 25.3% Female 47 30.4% 13.7% 2.1% 7.4% 12.8% 24.3% 44.7% 44.2% 40.4% 24.1% Asian 15 25.3% 27.1% 6.7% 3.7% 13.3% 14.5% 40.0% 41.6% 40.0% 40.3% Hispanic 13 14.6% 2.7% 7.7% 11.5% 23.1% 31.1% 53.8% 42.6% 15.4% 14.7% White 60 30.3% 23.0% 1.7% 5.0% 13.3% 17.3% 45.0% 43.0% 40.0% 34.6% Individual Education Plan Students 13 6.9% -28.4% 23.1% 36.9% 15.4% 36.8% 61.5% 21.5% 0.0% 4.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 14.3% 2.2% 3.4% 12.7% 27.6% 30.5% 44.8% 42.1% 24.1% 14.8% Select school year: 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 88 24.9% 7.6% 4.5% 12.5% 15.9% 25.2% 43.2% 39.5% 36.4% 22.8% Male 43 17.4% 5.7% 7.0% 14.4% 20.9% 25.1% 46.5% 37.7% 25.6% 22.7% Female 45 32.0% 9.6% 2.2% 10.4% 11.1% 25.3% 40.0% 41.4% 46.7% 22.9% Asian 10 35.3% 22.4% 0.0% 5.5% 10.0% 17.4% 50.0% 41.3% 40.0% 35.7% Hispanic 16 14.1% -3.1% 12.5% 16.4% 18.8% 32.1% 50.0% 38.3% 18.8% 13.2% White 53 32.1% 19.4% 3.8% 7.1% 9.4% 18.9% 41.5% 42.0% 45.3% 32.0% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -34.7% -33.2% 30.0% 44.1% 50.0% 34.5% 20.0% 17.5% 0.0% 4.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 6.2% -4.5% 13.0% 17.8% 26.1% 32.1% 30.4% 37.4% 30.4% 12.8% Select school year: 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 102 35.1% 16.6% 3.9% 14.4% 17.6% 25.7% 50.0% 40.7% 28.4% 19.2% Male 52 41.3% 14.8% 1.9% 16.7% 13.5% 25.2% 53.8% 38.5% 30.8% 19.6% Female 50 28.7% 18.5% 6.0% 12.0% 22.0% 26.3% 46.0% 43.0% 26.0% 18.8% Asian 12 40.0% 31.7% 0.0% 6.8% 16.7% 18.2% 41.7% 43.6% 41.7% 31.4% Hispanic 21 28.1% 4.2% 9.5% 19.5% 19.0% 32.9% 47.6% 37.4% 23.8% 10.2% White 61 37.0% 29.4% 3.3% 8.4% 16.4% 18.9% 54.1% 45.2% 26.2% 27.5% Individual Education Plan Students 15 3.4% -24.1% 13.3% 48.0% 40.0% 32.9% 33.3% 15.8% 13.3% 3.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 22.5% 3.8% 7.9% 20.5% 26.3% 32.4% 44.7% 37.0% 21.1% 10.1% Select school year: 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 3 Students Tested: 138
Double Diamond Elementary School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
14.5%Nevada:
21.5%
Approaches Standard This School:
14.5%State:
20.2%
Double Diamond Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
Male
This School : Nevada :
Female
This School : Nevada :
Hispanic
This School : Nevada :
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : State :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : Nevada :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 138 7.2% -5.5% 14.5% 21.5% 14.5% 20.2% 36.2% 32.6% 34.8% 25.7% Male 79 7.1% -8.6% 13.9% 24.2% 15.2% 20.6% 40.5% 31.8% 30.4% 23.4% Female 59 7.4% -2.3% 15.3% 18.7% 13.6% 19.8% 30.5% 33.5% 40.7% 28.0% Asian 14 21.9% 10.7% 0.0% 10.4% 14.3% 15.1% 50.0% 33.9% 35.7% 40.6% Hispanic 32 -10.7% -16.6% 25.0% 28.9% 21.9% 23.9% 40.6% 30.8% 12.5% 16.4% White 79 9.6% 7.9% 12.7% 12.6% 13.9% 15.7% 29.1% 35.2% 44.3% 36.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -11.2% -22.3% 15.8% 33.5% 31.6% 25.0% 47.4% 29.0% 5.3% 12.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 40 -11.3% -16.9% 22.5% 29.2% 25.0% 23.8% 35.0% 30.8% 17.5% 16.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 142 6.6% -3.0% 2.8% 3.4% 26.8% 35.8% 35.2% 34.7% 35.2% 26.1% Male 76 2.0% -6.5% 3.9% 4.0% 30.3% 38.7% 32.9% 33.3% 32.9% 24.0% Female 66 12.0% 0.7% 1.5% 2.8% 22.7% 32.7% 37.9% 36.1% 37.9% 28.4% Asian 18 19.5% 11.4% 0.0% 1.3% 16.7% 23.5% 38.9% 37.2% 44.4% 37.9% Hispanic 30 -10.5% -13.9% 10.0% 4.6% 36.7% 45.5% 30.0% 33.8% 23.3% 16.1% Black 13 -2.3% -16.9% 0.0% 5.7% 38.5% 47.4% 30.8% 30.6% 30.8% 16.3% White 77 12.8% 9.2% 1.3% 1.9% 22.1% 25.1% 36.4% 36.2% 40.3% 36.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -32.2% -22.2% 15.8% 5.5% 52.6% 52.8% 10.5% 31.5% 21.1% 10.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 46 -16.0% -14.1% 6.5% 4.9% 45.7% 45.4% 28.3% 33.1% 19.6% 16.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 117 15.8% 8.3% 0.9% 4.4% 31.6% 35.5% 37.6% 37.2% 29.9% 22.9% Male 64 10.8% 4.7% 1.6% 5.6% 35.9% 38.0% 39.1% 35.5% 23.4% 20.9% Female 53 21.9% 12.2% 0.0% 3.2% 26.4% 32.8% 35.8% 38.9% 37.7% 25.0% Asian 17 7.1% 18.5% 0.0% 2.2% 41.2% 27.6% 29.4% 39.8% 29.4% 30.4% Hispanic 26 -5.5% -3.3% 0.0% 6.3% 53.8% 45.3% 26.9% 34.7% 19.2% 13.7% White 69 29.5% 21.6% 0.0% 2.4% 18.8% 24.3% 44.9% 40.2% 36.2% 33.1% Individual Education Plan Students 17 -4.6% -24.6% 5.9% 19.2% 47.1% 53.7% 41.2% 20.0% 5.9% 7.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 15 -25.0% -11.9% 0.0% 7.8% 73.3% 52.5% 26.7% 32.3% 0.0% 7.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 28 -12.4% -3.8% 3.6% 6.5% 57.1% 45.6% 32.1% 34.6% 7.1% 13.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 98 21.5% 6.9% 2.1% 6.1% 24.7% 35.3% 45.4% 33.5% 27.8% 25.1% Male 54 12.5% 3.2% 0.0% 7.1% 35.8% 38.0% 47.2% 32.4% 17.0% 22.5% Female 44 32.4% 10.8% 4.5% 5.1% 11.4% 32.5% 43.2% 34.7% 40.9% 27.7% Asian 13 25.2% 20.2% 0.0% 3.1% 23.1% 25.0% 46.2% 36.5% 30.8% 35.4% Hispanic 21 10.2% -5.6% 0.0% 8.9% 38.1% 45.0% 38.1% 31.2% 23.8% 15.0% White 55 24.7% 19.8% 3.6% 3.5% 20.0% 25.0% 47.3% 36.0% 29.1% 35.5% Individual Education Plan Students 14 -5.5% -25.4% 7.7% 23.2% 46.2% 50.5% 38.5% 16.4% 7.7% 10.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 18 3.9% -14.3% 0.0% 11.2% 44.4% 51.4% 33.3% 28.6% 22.2% 8.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 6.4% -5.8% 3.2% 9.0% 38.7% 45.2% 41.9% 31.0% 16.1% 14.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 131 31.4% 19.7% 6.1% 7.0% 22.9% 33.7% 46.6% 43.1% 24.4% 16.2% Male 48 14.6% 15.5% 6.3% 8.6% 39.6% 36.3% 35.4% 40.6% 18.8% 14.5% Female 83 41.1% 24.1% 6.0% 5.4% 13.3% 30.9% 53.0% 45.7% 27.7% 18.0% Asian 16 29.2% 32.7% 6.3% 2.8% 25.0% 24.9% 37.5% 49.8% 31.3% 22.5% Hispanic 22 24.0% 7.4% 9.1% 10.2% 27.3% 42.9% 54.5% 38.6% 9.1% 8.4% White 79 35.1% 32.6% 6.3% 3.9% 19.0% 24.0% 46.8% 47.9% 27.8% 24.3% Individual Education Plan Students 15 -12.9% -10.3% 26.7% 24.6% 46.7% 46.1% 20.0% 22.4% 6.7% 6.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 15 0.4% -3.6% 20.0% 13.4% 40.0% 50.6% 40.0% 31.9% 0.0% 4.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 37 11.8% 6.5% 16.2% 10.5% 32.4% 43.4% 40.5% 37.6% 10.8% 8.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 20.6% 11.3% 6.5% 10.7% 33.3% 38.4% 35.0% 29.5% 25.2% 21.4% Male 66 10.4% 7.5% 10.6% 12.6% 39.4% 40.3% 25.8% 27.4% 24.2% 19.7% Female 57 32.3% 15.2% 1.8% 8.8% 26.3% 36.4% 45.6% 31.7% 26.3% 23.1% Asian 11 33.1% 24.7% 9.1% 5.4% 18.2% 30.3% 54.5% 35.0% 18.2% 29.3% Hispanic 18 4.8% -3.3% 11.1% 16.4% 44.4% 47.2% 27.8% 25.1% 16.7% 11.3% Black 10 -9.6% -2.3% 10.0% 15.1% 60.0% 47.6% 20.0% 25.0% 10.0% 12.3% White 79 27.5% 25.1% 3.8% 5.7% 29.1% 29.6% 35.4% 33.5% 31.6% 31.2% Individual Education Plan Students 18 -11.8% -17.1% 27.8% 32.2% 44.4% 45.3% 22.2% 14.5% 5.6% 8.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 15 -6.3% -15.3% 13.3% 21.4% 53.3% 54.2% 26.7% 19.1% 6.7% 5.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 2.3% -3.2% 12.9% 16.2% 45.2% 47.4% 29.0% 25.1% 12.9% 11.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 108 25.2% 4.8% 6.5% 12.3% 28.7% 43.2% 45.4% 29.9% 19.4% 14.6% Male 60 22.1% 1.8% 6.7% 14.2% 31.7% 44.4% 43.3% 28.2% 18.3% 13.3% Female 48 29.2% 8.2% 6.3% 10.3% 25.0% 41.9% 47.9% 31.8% 20.8% 16.1% Asian 11 51.3% 17.7% 0.0% 5.5% 9.1% 37.1% 27.3% 36.3% 63.6% 21.1% Hispanic 15 -19.6% -12.2% 26.7% 19.5% 53.3% 53.1% 13.3% 21.7% 6.7% 5.7% White 74 33.4% 19.4% 2.7% 6.3% 24.3% 34.7% 55.4% 36.7% 17.6% 22.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 36 7.6% -10.0% 13.9% 18.7% 38.9% 51.8% 36.1% 23.1% 11.1% 6.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 83 30.3% 17.2% 7.2% 10.7% 34.9% 44.6% 21.7% 28.0% 36.1% 16.8% Male 45 23.6% 13.6% 11.1% 12.6% 37.8% 46.2% 17.8% 26.5% 33.3% 14.7% Female 38 38.3% 20.9% 2.6% 8.6% 31.6% 43.0% 26.3% 29.5% 39.5% 18.9% Hispanic 12 5.8% -1.2% 8.3% 18.0% 58.3% 55.7% 16.7% 19.9% 16.7% 6.4% White 59 36.9% 31.7% 5.1% 5.4% 30.5% 35.4% 27.1% 33.7% 37.3% 25.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -7.5% -13.9% 10.0% 24.3% 70.0% 62.1% 10.0% 11.6% 10.0% 2.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 26.3% 1.3% 11.5% 16.1% 34.6% 55.1% 19.2% 21.2% 34.6% 7.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 4 Students Tested: 147
This School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
14.3%Nevada:
19.3%
Meets Standard This School:
57.1%Nevada:
46.3%
Double Diamond Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 147 12.3% -1.1% 7.5% 15.9% 14.3% 19.3% 57.1% 46.3% 21.1% 18.5% Male 78 9.7% -5.4% 10.3% 19.0% 14.1% 20.5% 61.5% 44.7% 14.1% 15.9% Female 69 15.3% 3.4% 4.4% 12.7% 14.5% 18.0% 52.2% 48.0% 29.0% 21.3% Asian 13 18.7% 13.5% 0.0% 7.4% 15.4% 13.2% 53.9% 52.0% 30.8% 27.4% Hispanic 41 4.8% -10.8% 9.8% 21.5% 19.5% 23.4% 58.5% 43.4% 12.2% 11.7% White 73 16.3% 10.9% 8.2% 9.1% 9.6% 14.1% 54.8% 50.0% 27.4% 26.8% Two or more Races 10 24.1% 7.9% 0.0% 10.5% 10.0% 15.7% 70.0% 49.5% 20.0% 24.3% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -32.6% -38.7% 58.3% 53.1% 8.3% 19.7% 33.3% 21.6% 0.0% 5.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -18.5% -16.6% 21.1% 25.4% 31.6% 25.3% 36.8% 40.0% 10.5% 9.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 44 -9.1% -11.4% 20.5% 21.7% 22.7% 23.8% 52.3% 43.1% 4.6% 11.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 126 7.9% -0.8% 3.2% 7.4% 23.0% 27.5% 42.1% 41.6% 31.7% 23.5% Male 74 7.1% -4.2% 2.7% 9.3% 24.3% 29.1% 44.6% 41.0% 28.4% 20.6% Female 52 9.1% 2.8% 3.8% 5.4% 21.2% 25.8% 38.5% 42.1% 36.5% 26.6% Asian 15 0.8% 9.1% 6.7% 3.4% 26.7% 21.6% 26.7% 43.8% 40.0% 31.2% Hispanic 29 -21.1% -11.7% 10.3% 10.1% 44.8% 35.6% 31.0% 39.4% 13.8% 14.9% White 80 20.4% 11.4% 0.0% 4.2% 13.8% 18.5% 50.0% 43.9% 36.3% 33.3% Individual Education Plan Students 14 -30.2% -39.2% 21.4% 33.6% 42.9% 39.7% 21.4% 20.3% 14.3% 6.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 23 -26.8% -27.9% 8.7% 14.5% 52.2% 47.4% 34.8% 33.1% 4.3% 5.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 42 -11.1% -11.7% 7.1% 10.7% 38.1% 35.1% 38.1% 39.6% 16.7% 14.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 102 18.2% 5.8% 4.9% 9.1% 20.6% 28.9% 58.8% 46.2% 15.7% 15.8% Male 51 12.3% 1.8% 2.0% 11.1% 29.4% 30.7% 52.9% 44.6% 15.7% 13.6% Female 51 24.1% 9.9% 7.8% 6.9% 11.8% 26.9% 64.7% 48.0% 15.7% 18.2% Asian 15 10.4% 16.1% 0.0% 4.2% 33.3% 23.4% 53.3% 48.1% 13.3% 24.3% Hispanic 17 2.5% -6.3% 0.0% 12.6% 41.2% 37.3% 58.8% 41.4% 0.0% 8.7% White 60 25.4% 18.8% 6.7% 5.4% 11.7% 19.4% 60.0% 52.0% 21.7% 23.1% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -25.5% -30.5% 30.8% 37.2% 38.5% 37.0% 30.8% 21.0% 0.0% 4.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 1.8% -6.1% 3.2% 13.0% 38.7% 36.8% 51.6% 41.3% 6.5% 8.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 116 16.1% 0.8% 6.0% 11.7% 21.6% 31.2% 50.0% 41.7% 22.4% 15.4% Male 49 4.9% -3.8% 12.2% 14.4% 26.5% 33.1% 51.0% 39.0% 10.2% 13.5% Female 67 24.3% 5.7% 1.5% 8.8% 17.9% 29.2% 49.3% 44.6% 31.3% 17.4% Asian 15 10.4% 13.9% 6.7% 5.9% 26.7% 24.0% 46.7% 46.7% 20.0% 23.5% Hispanic 17 20.2% -10.9% 11.8% 15.7% 11.8% 38.9% 58.8% 37.4% 17.6% 8.0% White 70 20.8% 13.0% 4.3% 7.1% 18.6% 23.5% 48.6% 46.6% 28.6% 22.8% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -14.6% -32.9% 16.7% 40.8% 41.7% 35.8% 25.0% 18.3% 16.7% 5.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 -3.0% -11.8% 16.7% 17.1% 30.0% 38.4% 43.3% 36.7% 10.0% 7.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 116 22.2% 14.5% 9.5% 13.0% 25.0% 29.2% 47.4% 41.5% 18.1% 16.3% Male 63 18.6% 9.4% 14.3% 16.1% 23.8% 31.1% 47.6% 38.3% 14.3% 14.5% Female 53 26.5% 19.9% 3.8% 9.7% 26.4% 27.1% 47.2% 44.9% 22.6% 18.2% Asian 15 23.4% 26.5% 6.7% 6.7% 26.7% 23.5% 60.0% 48.4% 6.7% 21.4% Hispanic 19 -1.2% 0.9% 15.8% 18.6% 42.1% 37.2% 26.3% 36.6% 15.8% 7.6% White 71 32.8% 28.0% 5.6% 7.4% 18.3% 21.2% 54.9% 46.4% 21.1% 24.9% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -20.2% -18.7% 46.2% 41.4% 30.8% 34.0% 23.1% 19.3% 0.0% 5.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 13 -12.5% -18.4% 38.5% 27.7% 30.8% 47.4% 30.8% 23.6% 0.0% 1.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 -3.8% 0.6% 18.4% 19.2% 42.1% 36.9% 36.8% 36.2% 2.6% 7.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 5 Students Tested: 130
Double Diamond Elementary School:
100.0%State:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
10.8%Nevada:
17.2%
Approaches Standard This School:
16.2%Nevada:
20.1%
Exceeds Standard This School:
33.9%State:
23.8%
Double Diamond Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 130 7.2% -3.2% 10.8% 17.2% 16.2% 20.1% 39.2% 38.9% 33.9% 23.8% Male 79 6.3% -7.4% 10.1% 20.7% 17.7% 20.7% 43.0% 37.3% 29.1% 21.2% Female 51 8.6% 1.2% 11.8% 13.5% 13.7% 19.4% 33.3% 40.5% 41.2% 26.6% Hispanic 30 -2.6% -13.3% 16.7% 22.8% 20.0% 24.6% 33.3% 37.2% 30.0% 15.5% White 79 15.1% 9.3% 5.1% 10.1% 13.9% 14.7% 45.6% 41.1% 35.4% 34.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -20.4% -19.8% 27.3% 27.4% 27.3% 26.5% 36.4% 34.7% 9.1% 11.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 44 -18.2% -14.0% 22.7% 23.4% 29.6% 24.7% 25.0% 37.1% 22.7% 14.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 109 2.9% -12.3% 0.9% 8.2% 30.3% 38.2% 49.5% 44.1% 19.3% 9.4% Male 52 1.4% -14.8% 1.9% 9.9% 30.8% 38.9% 57.7% 42.9% 9.6% 8.2% Female 57 4.3% -9.8% 0.0% 6.4% 29.8% 37.5% 42.1% 45.4% 28.1% 10.7% Asian 17 4.7% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 29.4% 30.3% 64.7% 49.6% 5.9% 16.3% Hispanic 22 -11.4% -25.1% 4.5% 11.3% 40.9% 47.8% 36.4% 36.1% 18.2% 4.8% White 59 12.1% 1.6% 0.0% 4.8% 22.0% 27.7% 54.2% 53.6% 23.7% 14.0% Individual Education Plan Students 11 -38.6% -47.5% 9.1% 37.8% 63.6% 43.8% 27.3% 16.5% 0.0% 1.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -38.6% -49.2% 0.0% 21.2% 72.7% 62.1% 27.3% 16.2% 0.0% 0.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 -27.4% -24.7% 2.6% 11.8% 59.0% 46.9% 35.9% 36.4% 2.6% 4.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 129 3.4% -4.4% 3.1% 8.6% 37.2% 39.4% 41.9% 43.4% 17.8% 8.5% Male 50 -8.3% -7.9% 6.0% 10.8% 46.0% 40.8% 36.0% 41.2% 12.0% 7.2% Female 79 10.8% -0.7% 1.3% 6.4% 31.6% 38.0% 45.6% 45.7% 21.5% 9.9% Asian 21 5.6% 8.1% 4.8% 4.4% 33.3% 31.2% 42.9% 50.3% 19.0% 14.2% Hispanic 17 -26.9% -16.2% 5.9% 11.8% 64.7% 48.1% 29.4% 35.4% 0.0% 4.7% White 78 11.6% 8.5% 1.3% 4.7% 30.8% 30.5% 47.4% 52.5% 20.5% 12.3% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -31.3% -40.2% 8.3% 38.2% 66.7% 45.7% 8.3% 14.3% 16.7% 1.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -38.1% -17.1% 6.1% 12.4% 75.8% 48.4% 18.2% 34.9% 0.0% 4.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 4.3% -9.7% 6.4% 11.5% 33.0% 41.8% 47.9% 39.0% 12.8% 7.6% Male 50 -6.3% -14.4% 12.0% 14.2% 38.0% 43.8% 44.0% 36.2% 6.0% 5.7% Female 45 16.4% -4.8% 0.0% 8.7% 27.3% 39.8% 52.3% 41.9% 20.5% 9.6% Asian 12 10.4% 1.5% 0.0% 6.3% 33.3% 35.9% 50.0% 46.5% 16.7% 11.3% Hispanic 13 -17.8% -23.5% 23.1% 16.9% 38.5% 50.3% 23.1% 29.4% 15.4% 3.4% White 62 6.0% 4.1% 4.9% 6.5% 32.8% 33.1% 50.8% 48.7% 11.5% 11.7% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -40.9% -42.8% 38.5% 45.4% 46.2% 41.2% 15.4% 11.8% 0.0% 1.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 27 -17.8% -23.3% 19.2% 17.1% 42.3% 49.9% 30.8% 29.6% 7.7% 3.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 101 19.1% 8.2% 5.9% 9.5% 31.7% 39.0% 57.4% 44.7% 5.0% 6.8% Male 49 11.8% 4.1% 8.2% 11.7% 36.7% 40.9% 49.0% 42.5% 6.1% 4.9% Female 52 25.9% 12.6% 3.8% 7.1% 26.9% 37.1% 65.4% 47.0% 3.8% 8.8% Asian 12 31.7% 18.2% 0.0% 4.9% 25.0% 33.5% 66.7% 52.1% 8.3% 9.5% Hispanic 14 -14.7% -6.1% 28.6% 13.9% 42.9% 48.9% 28.6% 34.6% 0.0% 2.6% White 68 25.8% 22.3% 2.9% 4.9% 27.9% 29.4% 63.2% 54.7% 5.9% 10.9% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -18.3% -26.6% 25.0% 36.5% 50.0% 46.8% 25.0% 15.7% 0.0% 1.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 -5.2% -5.9% 23.8% 14.2% 38.1% 48.4% 33.3% 34.5% 4.8% 2.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 91 10.6% -6.1% 6.6% 15.1% 37.4% 45.6% 47.3% 35.1% 8.8% 4.2% Male 46 2.4% -10.0% 13.0% 18.1% 39.1% 46.6% 43.5% 32.2% 4.3% 3.2% Female 45 19.0% -2.2% 0.0% 12.1% 35.6% 44.7% 51.1% 38.1% 13.3% 5.1% Asian 10 4.6% 2.9% 0.0% 8.6% 50.0% 43.1% 40.0% 42.8% 10.0% 5.5% Hispanic 22 4.6% -19.6% 9.1% 21.6% 40.9% 52.7% 45.5% 24.3% 4.5% 1.4% White 51 15.4% 7.4% 7.8% 8.5% 31.4% 38.6% 52.9% 46.1% 7.8% 6.8% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -45.4% -34.8% 38.5% 47.5% 61.5% 41.9% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 -5.4% -20.8% 10.0% 22.8% 50.0% 52.6% 40.0% 23.3% 0.0% 1.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 110 14.6% -2.9% 12.7% 14.1% 27.3% 43.4% 53.6% 36.9% 6.4% 5.6% Male 58 13.2% -5.6% 13.8% 16.7% 27.6% 43.5% 53.4% 34.9% 5.2% 4.9% Female 52 16.1% 0.2% 11.5% 11.1% 26.9% 43.3% 53.8% 39.2% 7.7% 6.4% Hispanic 23 -6.3% -19.7% 21.7% 22.3% 39.1% 51.9% 39.1% 23.9% 0.0% 1.8% White 71 23.6% 12.3% 9.9% 6.9% 21.1% 35.4% 59.2% 48.6% 9.9% 9.2% Individual Education Plan Students 21 -31.1% -31.8% 52.4% 43.9% 33.3% 42.4% 14.3% 12.6% 0.0% 1.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -35.4% -35.3% 50.0% 35.9% 40.0% 54.0% 10.0% 9.8% 0.0% 0.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 -0.6% -18.8% 20.7% 21.8% 34.5% 51.6% 41.4% 24.6% 3.4% 2.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 25.5% 9.0% 3.2% 12.5% 36.8% 43.9% 49.5% 37.3% 10.5% 6.3% Male 47 25.1% 5.8% 2.1% 14.8% 38.3% 44.9% 51.1% 35.4% 8.5% 4.9% Female 47 25.1% 12.5% 4.3% 10.0% 36.2% 43.0% 48.9% 39.3% 10.6% 7.7% Hispanic 14 8.4% -9.0% 0.0% 20.0% 57.1% 54.6% 35.7% 23.4% 7.1% 2.1% White 63 29.0% 23.8% 3.2% 6.5% 33.3% 35.2% 52.4% 48.2% 11.1% 10.1% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -3.7% -21.7% 15.4% 43.3% 53.8% 43.8% 23.1% 11.7% 7.7% 1.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 -6.9% -6.8% 6.9% 19.1% 65.5% 53.1% 20.7% 25.4% 6.9% 2.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 6 Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 96 26.6% 7.7% 7.3% 9.7% 11.5% 28.0% 50.0% 39.9% 31.3% 22.4% Male 49 20.8% 2.8% 10.2% 12.4% 14.3% 30.1% 51.0% 37.7% 24.5% 19.8% Female 47 32.6% 12.8% 4.3% 6.8% 8.5% 25.7% 48.9% 42.3% 38.3% 25.2% Asian 15 38.7% 20.5% 0.0% 4.2% 6.7% 20.6% 66.7% 43.2% 26.7% 32.0% Hispanic 13 6.9% -4.8% 15.4% 13.2% 23.1% 37.0% 38.5% 37.5% 23.1% 12.4% White 60 28.7% 20.4% 6.7% 5.8% 10.0% 19.1% 46.7% 42.6% 36.7% 32.5% Individual Education Plan Students 13 -16.2% -37.1% 46.2% 41.9% 15.4% 40.5% 30.8% 14.1% 7.7% 3.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 10.8% -4.8% 13.8% 14.0% 20.7% 36.1% 44.8% 37.3% 20.7% 12.6% Select school year: 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 88 20.3% 5.2% 3.4% 12.5% 21.6% 27.6% 47.7% 41.1% 27.3% 18.8% Male 43 10.4% -0.1% 4.7% 16.2% 30.2% 29.2% 37.2% 39.4% 27.9% 15.1% Female 45 29.8% 10.8% 2.2% 8.7% 13.3% 25.9% 57.8% 42.8% 26.7% 22.7% Asian 10 45.3% 17.7% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 20.9% 50.0% 45.4% 50.0% 27.0% Hispanic 16 -10.9% -7.9% 12.5% 17.7% 43.8% 35.5% 31.3% 36.9% 12.5% 9.9% White 53 26.5% 18.4% 0.0% 6.8% 18.9% 20.1% 50.9% 45.8% 30.2% 27.3% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -44.7% -36.9% 10.0% 45.4% 80.0% 36.8% 10.0% 15.4% 0.0% 2.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 1.9% -7.9% 4.3% 18.1% 39.1% 35.1% 30.4% 37.0% 26.1% 9.7% Select school year: 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 102 25.3% 13.6% 2.0% 11.9% 29.4% 31.2% 52.0% 44.0% 16.7% 12.9% Male 52 20.2% 8.2% 1.9% 15.4% 34.6% 33.1% 44.2% 41.3% 19.2% 10.3% Female 50 30.7% 19.2% 2.0% 8.3% 24.0% 29.2% 60.0% 46.9% 14.0% 15.5% Asian 12 31.7% 25.8% 0.0% 6.4% 25.0% 24.5% 41.7% 50.9% 33.3% 18.2% Hispanic 21 9.1% 0.2% 4.8% 17.2% 42.9% 39.2% 47.6% 37.4% 4.8% 6.1% White 61 30.5% 27.3% 0.0% 6.3% 26.2% 23.0% 59.0% 51.0% 14.8% 19.6% Individual Education Plan Students 15 -16.6% -27.1% 6.7% 42.5% 66.7% 41.3% 26.7% 15.1% 0.0% 1.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 9.3% -0.3% 5.3% 17.4% 42.1% 39.5% 42.1% 37.3% 10.5% 5.8% Select school year: 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 121 17.6% 23.0% 21.8% 25.4% 30.3% 25.9% 30.3% 25.7% Male 50 28.6% 27.8% 24.5% 26.6% 28.6% 24.3% 18.4% 21.3% Female 71 10.0% 18.0% 20.0% 24.2% 31.4% 27.5% 38.6% 30.3% Asian 15 21.4% 10.0% 7.1% 18.1% 28.6% 27.0% 42.9% 44.9% Black 10 44.4% 33.3% 22.2% 26.8% 11.1% 22.5% 22.2% 17.3% White 72 11.1% 14.6% 18.1% 21.5% 34.7% 27.9% 36.1% 36.0% Individual Education Plan Students 11 60.0% 53.8% 20.0% 23.9% 0.0% 13.1% 20.0% 9.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 28.6% 33.1% 25.0% 29.8% 39.3% 23.3% 7.1% 13.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 15.3% 22.9% 19.5% 24.2% 33.9% 25.4% 31.4% 27.5% Male 65 18.5% 27.7% 29.2% 25.4% 27.7% 24.0% 24.6% 22.9% Female 53 11.3% 17.9% 7.5% 23.1% 41.5% 26.8% 39.6% 32.2% Asian 15 6.7% 10.7% 20.0% 16.3% 33.3% 28.0% 40.0% 45.0% White 72 13.9% 14.0% 13.9% 19.8% 38.9% 27.6% 33.3% 38.5% Individual Education Plan Students 13 38.5% 52.9% 38.5% 23.7% 15.4% 14.2% 7.7% 9.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 14 35.7% 46.7% 35.7% 32.4% 21.4% 16.5% 7.1% 4.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 40 30.0% 33.6% 22.5% 29.3% 35.0% 22.6% 12.5% 14.5% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 105 17.1% 23.5% 17.1% 24.8% 41.9% 25.1% 23.8% 26.5% Male 54 18.5% 28.3% 14.8% 25.6% 46.3% 23.9% 20.4% 22.3% Female 51 15.7% 18.5% 19.6% 24.1% 37.3% 26.4% 27.5% 30.9% Asian 11 9.1% 10.4% 9.1% 18.5% 36.4% 27.6% 45.5% 43.5% Hispanic 13 46.2% 34.6% 23.1% 29.7% 23.1% 22.1% 7.7% 13.6% White 76 11.8% 14.3% 15.8% 21.0% 47.4% 27.9% 25.0% 36.8% Individual Education Plan Students 11 45.5% 52.4% 27.3% 25.4% 27.3% 13.4% 0.0% 8.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 34.8% 35.0% 13.0% 29.2% 34.8% 21.7% 17.4% 14.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 21.1% 23.5% 20.0% 25.1% 25.3% 24.9% 33.7% 26.6% Male 48 31.3% 27.9% 20.8% 26.1% 20.8% 23.5% 27.1% 22.5% Female 47 10.6% 18.9% 19.1% 24.0% 29.8% 26.2% 40.4% 30.9% Asian 10 30.0% 10.8% 10.0% 18.4% 0.0% 27.1% 60.0% 43.7% Hispanic 14 35.7% 34.9% 28.6% 29.8% 14.3% 21.6% 21.4% 13.7% White 63 17.5% 14.5% 15.9% 21.7% 33.3% 27.3% 33.3% 36.5% Individual Education Plan Students 18 72.2% 53.7% 16.7% 24.7% 11.1% 13.6% 0.0% 8.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 35.3% 35.3% 29.4% 30.0% 17.6% 21.1% 17.6% 13.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 106 18.9% 26.8% 25.5% 23.8% 24.5% 24.0% 31.1% 25.4% Male 50 22.0% 31.1% 28.0% 24.4% 18.0% 22.9% 32.0% 21.6% Female 56 16.1% 22.2% 23.2% 23.1% 30.4% 25.2% 30.4% 29.5% Hispanic 23 21.7% 39.4% 34.8% 28.6% 21.7% 20.2% 21.7% 11.9% White 62 19.4% 17.5% 24.2% 20.6% 19.4% 26.3% 37.1% 35.5% Individual Education Plan Students 23 43.5% 57.0% 47.8% 23.0% 4.3% 12.1% 4.3% 7.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 25.0% 38.2% 31.3% 28.3% 21.9% 21.0% 21.9% 12.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 121 18.3% 20.6% 23.3% 24.2% 30.0% 27.9% 28.3% 27.3% Male 50 18.0% 21.9% 34.0% 23.0% 22.0% 26.4% 26.0% 28.7% Female 71 18.6% 19.2% 15.7% 25.4% 35.7% 29.6% 30.0% 25.8% Asian 15 7.1% 10.1% 14.3% 18.9% 35.7% 28.9% 42.9% 42.2% Black 10 20.0% 34.3% 40.0% 27.1% 20.0% 23.1% 20.0% 15.6% White 72 15.3% 13.1% 18.1% 20.4% 31.9% 29.1% 34.7% 37.4% Individual Education Plan Students 11 50.0% 46.5% 30.0% 25.1% 0.0% 15.8% 20.0% 12.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 27.6% 28.9% 31.0% 27.9% 24.1% 26.7% 17.2% 16.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 17.9% 20.8% 19.7% 24.4% 32.5% 27.4% 29.9% 27.3% Male 65 18.8% 21.6% 21.9% 23.6% 28.1% 26.1% 31.3% 28.7% Female 53 17.0% 20.0% 17.0% 25.3% 37.7% 28.7% 28.3% 26.0% Asian 15 13.3% 9.7% 20.0% 19.3% 33.3% 29.2% 33.3% 41.9% White 72 11.1% 12.7% 18.1% 20.2% 34.7% 28.8% 36.1% 38.3% Individual Education Plan Students 13 46.2% 46.5% 15.4% 24.6% 30.8% 16.6% 7.7% 12.3% Limited English Proficiency Students 14 50.0% 38.2% 21.4% 32.6% 28.6% 21.5% 0.0% 7.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 40 40.0% 29.7% 17.5% 29.1% 30.0% 25.5% 12.5% 15.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 105 14.4% 21.4% 23.1% 24.6% 36.5% 26.9% 26.0% 27.0% Male 54 11.3% 22.6% 18.9% 23.5% 32.1% 25.5% 37.7% 28.5% Female 51 17.6% 20.3% 27.5% 25.7% 41.2% 28.5% 13.7% 25.6% Asian 11 9.1% 10.8% 27.3% 20.7% 18.2% 27.8% 45.5% 40.7% Hispanic 13 46.2% 30.1% 23.1% 28.9% 15.4% 25.5% 15.4% 15.5% White 76 6.7% 13.0% 22.7% 20.8% 44.0% 28.9% 26.7% 37.3% Individual Education Plan Students 11 27.3% 46.2% 36.4% 26.1% 27.3% 16.2% 9.1% 11.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 31.8% 31.5% 22.7% 29.1% 31.8% 24.2% 13.6% 15.2% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 13.7% 22.1% 30.5% 25.2% 32.6% 27.2% 23.2% 25.5% Male 48 14.6% 23.3% 31.3% 24.0% 25.0% 26.1% 29.2% 26.6% Female 47 12.8% 20.9% 29.8% 26.4% 40.4% 28.2% 17.0% 24.4% Asian 10 10.0% 11.4% 30.0% 20.2% 20.0% 30.4% 40.0% 38.0% Hispanic 14 14.3% 30.3% 42.9% 30.5% 14.3% 24.9% 28.6% 14.4% White 63 11.1% 14.4% 28.6% 21.2% 39.7% 29.3% 20.6% 35.0% Individual Education Plan Students 18 33.3% 48.9% 44.4% 24.5% 16.7% 16.4% 5.6% 10.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 23.5% 31.9% 44.1% 30.0% 23.5% 24.0% 8.8% 14.1% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 106 21.7% 25.0% 25.5% 23.9% 27.4% 26.7% 25.5% 24.5% Male 50 18.0% 25.6% 24.0% 22.8% 28.0% 25.7% 30.0% 25.9% Female 56 25.0% 24.4% 26.8% 24.9% 26.8% 27.7% 21.4% 23.0% Hispanic 23 30.4% 34.2% 34.8% 28.1% 26.1% 24.8% 8.7% 12.9% White 62 16.1% 16.8% 22.6% 20.8% 25.8% 28.5% 35.5% 34.0% Individual Education Plan Students 23 43.5% 51.5% 34.8% 24.3% 21.7% 15.1% 0.0% 9.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 25.0% 34.8% 28.1% 28.0% 37.5% 23.9% 9.4% 13.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 121 13.3% 23.7% 19.2% 27.6% 30.0% 25.3% 37.5% 23.5% Male 50 18.0% 25.9% 22.0% 27.8% 30.0% 24.1% 30.0% 22.2% Female 71 10.0% 21.4% 17.1% 27.3% 30.0% 26.5% 42.9% 24.8% Asian 15 14.3% 13.4% 21.4% 26.1% 28.6% 30.3% 35.7% 30.2% Black 10 20.0% 31.9% 50.0% 30.0% 20.0% 23.9% 10.0% 14.2% White 72 6.9% 11.6% 16.7% 21.5% 29.2% 29.4% 47.2% 37.5% Individual Education Plan Students 11 40.0% 53.9% 20.0% 24.7% 30.0% 12.0% 10.0% 9.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 20.7% 35.4% 27.6% 32.7% 37.9% 21.0% 13.8% 10.9% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 16.1% 24.8% 25.4% 27.0% 22.9% 24.8% 35.6% 23.4% Male 65 23.1% 26.9% 27.7% 27.2% 20.0% 23.5% 29.2% 22.4% Female 53 7.5% 22.6% 22.6% 26.9% 26.4% 26.1% 43.4% 24.4% Asian 15 13.3% 14.1% 46.7% 26.7% 6.7% 30.1% 33.3% 29.1% White 72 15.3% 11.5% 15.3% 21.6% 23.6% 29.7% 45.8% 37.2% Individual Education Plan Students 13 61.5% 54.0% 23.1% 24.4% 7.7% 12.8% 7.7% 8.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 14 42.9% 58.9% 35.7% 31.7% 21.4% 8.0% 0.0% 1.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 40 27.5% 37.9% 35.0% 31.7% 25.0% 20.1% 12.5% 10.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 105 11.5% 25.9% 26.9% 26.5% 26.0% 23.9% 35.6% 23.7% Male 54 13.2% 27.9% 22.6% 26.6% 22.6% 22.9% 41.5% 22.6% Female 51 9.8% 23.9% 31.4% 26.5% 29.4% 24.8% 29.4% 24.8% Asian 11 0.0% 15.0% 27.3% 25.4% 18.2% 31.1% 54.5% 28.5% Hispanic 13 30.8% 42.7% 53.8% 30.3% 0.0% 17.9% 15.4% 9.1% White 76 6.7% 11.9% 22.7% 22.3% 32.0% 28.5% 38.7% 37.3% Individual Education Plan Students 11 36.4% 53.0% 45.5% 26.1% 9.1% 12.7% 9.1% 8.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 27.3% 40.0% 36.4% 30.7% 22.7% 18.6% 13.6% 10.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 21.1% 25.8% 21.1% 26.9% 28.4% 24.0% 29.5% 23.3% Male 48 31.3% 27.3% 18.8% 27.3% 18.8% 23.2% 31.3% 22.1% Female 47 10.6% 24.1% 23.4% 26.4% 38.3% 24.9% 27.7% 24.5% Asian 10 30.0% 15.7% 10.0% 26.6% 20.0% 31.3% 40.0% 26.4% Hispanic 14 35.7% 43.2% 21.4% 31.3% 28.6% 17.0% 14.3% 8.5% White 63 14.3% 12.5% 20.6% 22.4% 33.3% 28.5% 31.7% 36.5% Individual Education Plan Students 18 72.2% 53.6% 22.2% 25.9% 0.0% 12.5% 5.6% 8.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 32.4% 40.3% 32.4% 31.0% 20.6% 18.7% 14.7% 10.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 106 18.9% 27.4% 24.5% 27.0% 27.4% 21.2% 29.2% 24.4% Male 50 20.0% 28.7% 24.0% 27.6% 22.0% 20.5% 34.0% 23.2% Female 56 17.9% 26.0% 25.0% 26.4% 32.1% 21.9% 25.0% 25.6% Hispanic 23 30.4% 46.3% 34.8% 30.3% 21.7% 15.0% 13.0% 8.4% White 62 16.1% 13.9% 19.4% 23.3% 24.2% 25.2% 40.3% 37.5% Individual Education Plan Students 23 43.5% 54.6% 39.1% 27.4% 13.0% 10.3% 4.3% 7.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 37.5% 41.5% 25.0% 30.9% 25.0% 16.7% 12.5% 11.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Double Diamond Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 121 5.8% 19.9% 25.0% 26.8% 32.5% 31.5% 36.7% 21.8% Male 50 8.0% 21.4% 28.0% 26.2% 38.0% 29.8% 26.0% 22.6% Female 71 4.3% 18.2% 22.9% 27.6% 28.6% 33.3% 44.3% 20.9% Asian 15 7.1% 13.2% 28.6% 22.9% 7.1% 35.2% 57.1% 28.7% Black 10 10.0% 29.7% 50.0% 33.6% 30.0% 26.2% 10.0% 10.5% White 72 5.6% 11.8% 16.7% 19.6% 33.3% 34.4% 44.4% 34.2% Individual Education Plan Students 11 10.0% 34.7% 40.0% 31.4% 40.0% 22.3% 10.0% 11.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 6.9% 28.0% 44.8% 33.0% 34.5% 28.2% 13.8% 10.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 13.6% 21.4% 23.7% 26.8% 33.9% 30.8% 28.8% 21.1% Male 65 16.9% 22.7% 21.5% 26.0% 38.5% 29.2% 23.1% 22.1% Female 53 9.4% 20.0% 26.4% 27.6% 28.3% 32.5% 35.8% 20.0% Asian 15 6.7% 14.1% 33.3% 23.9% 33.3% 36.2% 26.7% 25.7% White 72 11.1% 11.9% 13.9% 20.2% 41.7% 34.6% 33.3% 33.2% Individual Education Plan Students 13 30.8% 35.7% 23.1% 30.8% 30.8% 22.3% 15.4% 11.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 14 35.7% 41.0% 21.4% 37.9% 35.7% 18.4% 7.1% 2.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 40 22.5% 30.7% 37.5% 32.5% 25.0% 26.7% 15.0% 10.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 105 10.5% 22.4% 21.9% 26.3% 33.3% 30.7% 34.3% 20.6% Male 54 13.0% 23.7% 22.2% 25.6% 25.9% 29.4% 38.9% 21.3% Female 51 7.8% 21.1% 21.6% 27.1% 41.2% 31.9% 29.4% 19.9% Asian 11 9.1% 14.1% 36.4% 25.5% 18.2% 36.4% 36.4% 24.0% Hispanic 13 15.4% 33.0% 53.8% 32.3% 15.4% 25.6% 15.4% 9.1% White 76 7.9% 12.6% 14.5% 20.4% 38.2% 34.8% 39.5% 32.2% Individual Education Plan Students 11 36.4% 36.7% 18.2% 31.5% 9.1% 22.0% 36.4% 9.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 17.4% 32.4% 39.1% 32.2% 17.4% 25.9% 26.1% 9.5% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 95 7.4% 22.7% 25.3% 27.3% 36.8% 30.2% 30.5% 19.8% Male 48 8.3% 23.8% 29.2% 27.0% 20.8% 28.9% 41.7% 20.2% Female 47 6.4% 21.5% 21.3% 27.6% 53.2% 31.5% 19.1% 19.4% Asian 10 10.0% 14.8% 40.0% 27.5% 10.0% 33.8% 40.0% 23.9% Hispanic 14 7.1% 33.2% 28.6% 33.5% 42.9% 25.2% 21.4% 8.0% White 63 6.3% 13.2% 17.5% 21.5% 42.9% 34.7% 33.3% 30.5% Individual Education Plan Students 18 22.2% 37.1% 44.4% 33.3% 16.7% 19.9% 16.7% 9.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 8.8% 32.7% 38.2% 33.4% 35.3% 25.0% 17.6% 9.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 106 13.2% 22.4% 17.9% 24.1% 39.6% 33.2% 29.2% 20.4% Male 50 12.0% 23.9% 16.0% 23.5% 38.0% 31.7% 34.0% 21.0% Female 56 14.3% 20.8% 19.6% 24.7% 41.1% 34.7% 25.0% 19.8% Hispanic 23 21.7% 32.3% 30.4% 30.9% 39.1% 28.4% 8.7% 8.4% White 62 9.7% 14.1% 14.5% 17.9% 35.5% 36.8% 40.3% 31.2% Individual Education Plan Students 23 17.4% 38.7% 43.5% 28.7% 30.4% 24.2% 8.7% 8.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 18.8% 31.4% 25.0% 30.3% 43.8% 29.0% 12.5% 9.2% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Reno, NV Double Diamond Elementary School in Reno, Nevada (NV)
-8.3%
-18.6%
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: