
Back to: Miami, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 7.
305 NW 3RD AVE
Miami, FL 33128
Other nearby schools ratings:
Downtown Miami Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  MiamiDade County:  45  Miami:  44  Downtown Miami Charter School:  7 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Miami, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (305) 5792112 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 3600
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 5792115
Principal: Sylvia Hall
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 4 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 107
Senate District: 36
School Web Address: http://www.downtowncharter.org
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  53%  State average from 68 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  44%  State average from 68 schools:  79% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  77%  State average from 68 schools:  86% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  20%  State average from 68 schools:  55% 
Making Reading Gains DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  62%  State average from 68 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  41%  State average from 68 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  61%  State average from 68 schools:  59% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  50%  State average from 68 schools:  65% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  408  State average from 68 schools:  549 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 68 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: D
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: F
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  87%  State average from 68 schools:  57% 
Minority RateDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  97%  State average from 68 schools:  46% 
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 325 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 325 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 285
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 286
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 209 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 184
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 184
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 90
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 278 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 278 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 254
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 243
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 255
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 244
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 36
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  49%  State average from 68 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  50%  State average from 68 schools:  78% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  87%  State average from 68 schools:  90% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  23%  State average from 68 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  64%  State average from 68 schools:  68% 
Making Math GainsHere:  56%  State average from 68 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  55%  State average from 68 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  61%  State average from 68 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  445  State average from 68 schools:  561 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 68 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: F
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  82%  State average from 68 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  97%  State average from 68 schools:  46% 
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 322 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 293
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 293
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 211
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 213
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 212
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 64
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 254 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 254 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 230
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 230
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 26
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 15
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  44%  State average from 65 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  46%  State average from 65 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 65 schools:  84% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  22%  State average from 65 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  54%  State average from 65 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  60%  State average from 65 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  65%  State average from 65 schools:  59% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  69%  State average from 65 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  446  State average from 65 schools:  536 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 65 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: F
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  43%  State average from 65 schools:  52% 
Minority RateHere:  97%  State average from 65 schools:  46% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 293 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 293 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 264
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 278
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 266
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 206 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 206 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 187
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 189
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 96
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 96
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  43%  State average from 60 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  29%  State average from 60 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  83%  State average from 60 schools:  84% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  12%  State average from 60 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  51%  State average from 60 schools:  69% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math GainsHere:  47%  State average from 60 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  46%  State average from 60 schools:  66% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  57%  State average from 60 schools:  65% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  368  State average from 60 schools:  538 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 60 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: F
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  82%  State average from 60 schools:  55% 
Minority RateHere:  97%  State average from 60 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 318 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 319 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 302
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  28%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 303
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 235 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 236 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  28%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 254 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 254 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  51%  State average from 61 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  39%  State average from 61 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  72%  State average from 61 schools:  83% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  64%  State average from 61 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  60%  State average from 61 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  74%  State average from 61 schools:  64% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  360  State average from 61 schools:  421 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 61 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: F
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  81%  State average from 61 schools:  55% 
Minority RateHere:  97%  State average from 61 schools:  54% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 274 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 70
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 261
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 261
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 43
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 174
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 174
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 72
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 72
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 53
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 208
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 208
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 35
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  47%  State average from 59 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  40%  State average from 59 schools:  66% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  87%  State average from 59 schools:  85% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  61%  State average from 59 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  56%  State average from 59 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  65%  State average from 59 schools:  62% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  356  State average from 59 schools:  418 
Percent TestedDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 59 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: F
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  79%  State average from 59 schools:  56% 
Minority RateHere:  96%  State average from 59 schools:  54% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1243  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  28%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  11%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  42%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  17%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  61%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1381  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  36%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  26%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  38%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  16  State average:  19 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1464  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  277  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  28%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  15%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  47%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1611  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  293  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  25%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  22%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  33%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  16%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  52%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  13  State average:  14 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  33%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  49%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  15%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  17%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  1312  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  22%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  17%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  59%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1379  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  25%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  34%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  37%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  41%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  5  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1491  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  36%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  42%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  15%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  22%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1609  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  39%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  36%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  43%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1045  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  258  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1419  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  292  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 01%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1508  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1610  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  293  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  273  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  1340  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1450  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1520  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1603  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  293  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 83
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 84%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1139  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  273  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1433  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  294  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1484  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1548  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  282  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  274  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1320  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1443  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  297  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1551  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1590  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  78  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  613  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  636  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Median NPRDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  55  State average:  69 
Initial Understanding (max 12)DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  9  State average:  10 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  77  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  651  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  653  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 87
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  292  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 85%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1091  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  266  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1451  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  297  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1478  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1350  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 127
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1401  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  266  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1406  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1380  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 25
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1540  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  281  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1554  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1440  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 114
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  244  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1117  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  260  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  1461  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1478  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1279  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 199
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1470  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500DOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  291  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1475  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1425  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 49
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1454  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  259  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1454  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1489  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 35
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 120
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  601  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 76
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  631  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71
Mean Scale ScoreDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  643  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  656  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 49
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 119
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  601  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 41
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 75
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  635  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 63
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71
Mean Scale ScoreDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  634  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 48
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 49
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  646  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 76
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  280  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 42%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedDOWNTOWN MIAMI CHARTER SCHOOL:  3  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 83%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 61%
