City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 41.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Data House School (5.7 miles): | 89 |
| Ese Homebound School (19.9 miles): | 67 |
| St. Lucie Detention Center School (5.0 miles): | 55 |
| Jensen Beach High School (16.4 miles): | 44 |
| Drop Back In Academy School: | 41 |
| Fort Pierce Westwood High School (1.4 miles): | 30 |
| Performance Based Diploma Prog School (4.0 miles): | 19 |
| The Charter Of Fort Pierce School (2.7 miles): | 2 |
| Indian Hills School (2.9 miles): | 0 |
Drop Back In Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| St. Lucie County: | 39 |
| Fort Pierce: | 40 |
| Drop Back In Academy School: | 41 |
1
YOLANDA
May 7, 2011 @ 4:16 pm
MY SON IS A SENIOR AT WESTWOOD HIGH SCHOOL. BUT HE WILL NOT BE GRADUATING IN JUNE WITH HIS CLASS, IT SEEMS TO BE THAT HE IS ONLY 1 CREDIT FROM GRADUATING OR THAT HOPE CLASS FOR SENIORS. AND IM AFFRAID THAT HE WILL NOT WANT TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL NEXT YEAR. CAN YOUR PROGRAM HELP AND IF SO DOES THE ARMY ACCEPT HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA'S FROM THIS PROGRAM?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 56
School number: 5071
School type: Senior High
District Name: ST. LUCIE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (772) 460-3804
Principal: James Sullivan
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 78
Senate District: 26
School Web Address: www.alternativesunlimited.com
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 23% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 57% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 490 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 119999: F
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (67%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (58%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 74% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 83% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 577 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: F
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
Region: 3| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 553 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: F
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 154 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 433 |
| State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: F
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 251 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 249 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 412 |
| State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: F
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 328 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 328 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 320 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 320 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 99% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 231 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 49% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 301 |
| State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: F
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 1472 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 268 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 25% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 1664 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1844 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 9% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1574 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 248 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 80% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 30% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 50% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 237 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1534 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 53% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 29% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1818 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 313 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 19% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1903 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 17% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1701 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 236 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 5% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 21% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1659 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1715 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1861 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1733 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1842 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1891 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1728 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 244 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 51
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1599 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 291 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1716 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1882 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1661 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1826 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1897 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 321 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 48 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 649 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 43 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 64 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 669 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 56 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 70 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 688 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 65 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 69
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%| Here: | 293 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1505 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%| Here: | 274 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1505 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 73| Here: | 1432 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1711 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1716 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 74| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 1642 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 1751 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%| Here: | 282 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1755 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 71| Here: | 1684 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%| Here: | 269 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1614 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 296 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1622 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 30| Here: | 1591 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1783 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1790 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 113| Here: | 1678 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1777 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1782 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71| Here: | 1711 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 87
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 45| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 652 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 86
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 58| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 672 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 90
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 51| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 674 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 87
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 55| Here: | 659 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 86
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 68| Here: | 682 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 90
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 55| DROP BACK IN ACADEMY: | 682 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 88
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 30%| Here: | 270 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 23%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 64%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 94%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.