Dwight D. Eisenhower Elementary School in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 35.

2926 LONE PINE RD
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Teen Parent Program - Pk School (10.7 miles):

93
Equestrian Trails Elementary School (17.9 miles):

77
Diamond View Elementary School (17.7 miles):

63
Belvedere Elementary School (11.6 miles):

54
Highland Elementary School (16.0 miles):

47
Forest Hill Elementary School (14.7 miles):

40
Dwight D. Eisenhower Elementary School:

35
Barton Elementary School (17.9 miles):

26
Guided Path Academy Charter School (18.2 miles):

1
Dwight D. Eisenhower Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Palm Beach Gardens:

45
Dwight D. Eisenhower Elementary:

35

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA






Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 366-6000 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 1541
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 366-6050
Principal: James Pegg
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 4 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 83
Senate District: 25
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Dwight_D_Eisenhower_El

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

60%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

51%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

516
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

86%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

61%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

83%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

620
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

453
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

55%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

54%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

513
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1096 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1096 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 522
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1039
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1040
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 578 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 578 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 298
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 558
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 559
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 220 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 374 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 374 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 156
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 342
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

406
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1136 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1135 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 502
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1063
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1065
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 599 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 596 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 259

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 571
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 571
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (95%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 96

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 211
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 212
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 104

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 205
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 205
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 373 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 375 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 151

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 335
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 338
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 49

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 104
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 102
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

403
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1327
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1634
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

76%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1572
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

42%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1934
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1967
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

57%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1398
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1520
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1670
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1962
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

66%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2018
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

85%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1396
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1553
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 05%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1701
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1939
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1991
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1513
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

346
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1581
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1696
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1970
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2019
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

332
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 63
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 514
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1314
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1465
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

300
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1571
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1965
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2008
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1423
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1457
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1991
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2042
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

60
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

56
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

54
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

44
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

507
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

711
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

437
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

723
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 54
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

285
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 466
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

315
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1959
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1973
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1897
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 77

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1983
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

2004
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1973
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 31

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1976
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1993
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1953
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 40

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2026
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2033
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2005
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 27

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 509
Mean Scale Score
Here:

720
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 524
Mean Scale Score
Here:

709
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 509
Mean Scale Score
Here:

730
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 83
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 10

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 523
Mean Scale Score
Here:

727
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 536
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

316
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2017 Advameg, Inc.