|
Back to: Tuba City, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 28.
Address: Cameron, Arizona
Tuba City, WI 86045
Grade span: K-6
Schedule: 12:00 AM to 05:00 PM
Principal: Mrs. Lorna Lewis
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 679-2243
Fax: (928) 679-2580
Homepage: www.tcusd.k12.org
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 4
- Grade 6
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Enrollment In 2002: 137
Enrollment In 2003: 160
Enrollment In 2004: 149
Enrollment In 2005: 135
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 99.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 80.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 86.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 9.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 6.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 11.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 7.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 10.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 7.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 10.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 5.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: No
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 3
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 18
All Students Percent Tested: 106%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 16.72% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 55.74% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 111%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 38.0% | | State average from 763 schools: | 17.90% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 55.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 15
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 840 schools: | 16.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 56.41% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 42.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 23.28% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 16.63% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 46.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 82%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 24.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 20.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 22.00% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 10.31% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 25.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 925 schools: | 54.83% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 12.75% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 27.38% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 52.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 24.05% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 58.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 95%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 35.14% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 46.72% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 15
All Students Percent Tested: 83%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 83%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 13
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 87%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 83%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 18
All Students Percent Tested: 106%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 40.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 25.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 36.04% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 834 schools: | 30.22% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 111%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 25.83% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 36.40% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 30.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 15
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 36.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 25.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 866 schools: | 36.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 30.96% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 19
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 30.01% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 92%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 23.57% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 32.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 82%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 31.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 17
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 20.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 661 schools: | 30.12% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 10.99% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 51.29% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 5.0% | | State average from 863 schools: | 20.62% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 15.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 12.22% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 18.70% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 50.15% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 22.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 9.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 17.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 60.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 53.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 22.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 95%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 15.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 25.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 50.39% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 10.72% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 16
All Students Percent Tested: 89%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 25.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 92%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 93%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 79.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 89%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 105%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 19.36% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 24.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 45.50% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 108%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 17.15% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 24.58% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 47.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 12
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 109%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 18.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 24.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 46.28% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 774 schools: | 24.29% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 23.51% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 41.36% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 91%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 37.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 15
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 88%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 58.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 26.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 30.71% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 16
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 908 schools: | 23.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 920 schools: | 57.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 13
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 33.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 21.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 67.0% | | State average from 906 schools: | 61.89% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 13
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 32.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 49.11% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 18
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 12
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 105%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 13.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 37.01% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 108%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 12.82% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 40.21% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 37.27% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 12
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 109%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 754 schools: | 12.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 38.07% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 62.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 40.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 14.20% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 41.56% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 32.52% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 91%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.56% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 15
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 88%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 58.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 21.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 47.62% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 20.07% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 16
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 14.02% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 904 schools: | 19.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 47.89% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 846 schools: | 20.33% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 13
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 18.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 51.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 835 schools: | 22.65% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 13
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 652 schools: | 20.35% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 697 schools: | 25.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 45.43% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 622 schools: | 10.58% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 18
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 19.39% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 12
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 21.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 9.85% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 25.46% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 54.33% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 739 schools: | 9.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 17.58% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 4: | 47.0% | | State average from 723 schools: | 32.68% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 47.45% |
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 14.58% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Grade 4: | 43.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 12.66% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 17.13% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 48.00% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 662 schools: | 15.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 23.16% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 48.66% |
Grade 6
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 12
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 10.96% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 25.11% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 60.39% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 10
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 12
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 767 schools: | 18.82% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 19.58% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 46.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 727 schools: | 16.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 10
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
|