|
Back to: Springfield, VT, Vermont, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Vermont forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2007 test average as compared to other schools in Vermont) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 66.
10 HOOVER STREET
Springfield, VT 5156
County: WINDSOR
Grade span: Kindergarten - 5th Grade
Phone: (802) 885-5154 (make sure to verify first before calling)
Enrollment in Elm Hill School
Kindergarten Enrollment : 18
1st Grade Enrollment : 19
2nd Grade Enrollment : 22
3rd Grade Enrollment : 20
4th Grade Enrollment : 21
5th Grade Enrollment : 19
Ungraded Enrollment : 3
Female Enrollment : 67
Male Enrollment : 54
White Enrollment : 117
Black Enrollment : 2
Hispanic Enrollment : 2
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 32
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 7
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 39
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 13
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 9.4
Genders in Elm Hill School Grades in Elm Hill School
2004 Student Enrollment: 114
Kindergarten Enrollment : 16
1st Grade Enrollment : 19
2nd Grade Enrollment : 19
3rd Grade Enrollment : 19
4th Grade Enrollment : 19
5th Grade Enrollment : 20
Ungraded Enrollment : 2
Female Enrollment : 56
Male Enrollment : 56
White Enrollment : 109
Black Enrollment : 2
Hispanic Enrollment : 1
Migrant Students Enrollment : 1
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 26
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 20
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 46
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 12.7
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 9
2003 Student Enrollment: 115
Kindergarten Enrollment : 18
1st Grade Enrollment : 17
2nd Grade Enrollment : 20
3rd Grade Enrollment : 19
4th Grade Enrollment : 16
5th Grade Enrollment : 25
Female Enrollment : 50
Male Enrollment : 63
White Enrollment : 110
Black Enrollment : 2
Hispanic Enrollment : 1
Migrant Students Enrollment : 2
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 26
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 19
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 45
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 12.8
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 9
2002 Student Enrollment: 124
Kindergarten Enrollment : 18
1st Grade Enrollment : 20
2nd Grade Enrollment : 16
3rd Grade Enrollment : 18
4th Grade Enrollment : 24
5th Grade Enrollment : 28
Female Enrollment : 57
Male Enrollment : 67
White Enrollment : 122
Black Enrollment : 2
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 35
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 13
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 48
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 13.9
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 8.9
2001 Student Enrollment: 123
Kindergarten Enrollment : 18
1st Grade Enrollment : 16
2nd Grade Enrollment : 20
3rd Grade Enrollment : 25
4th Grade Enrollment : 27
5th Grade Enrollment : 17
Female Enrollment : 59
Male Enrollment : 64
White Enrollment : 121
Black Enrollment : 2
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 32
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 13
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 45
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 14
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 8.8
Attendance Rate in Elm Hill School Retention Rate in Elm Hill School
Attendance rate: 96.4% | Here: | 96.4% | | State average from 232 schools: | 95.4% |
Retention rate: 2.5% | This school: | 2.5% | | State average from 169 schools: | 3.3% |
Special education (%): 13.1% | Here: | 13.1% | | State average from 231 schools: | 12.4% |
Home study students : 1
2005 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 96.7% | This school: | 96.7% | | State average from 233 schools: | 95.2% |
Retention rate: 2.7% | Here: | 2.7% | | State average from 180 schools: | 3.3% |
Special education (%): 13.2% | Elm Hill School: | 13.2% | | State average from 232 schools: | 12.3% |
2004 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 96.5% | Here: | 96.5% | | State average from 232 schools: | 95.5% |
Retention rate: 3.4% | Here: | 3.4% | | State average from 141 schools: | 2.4% |
Special education (%): 13.0% | Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 231 schools: | 12.3% |
2006 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 6.90
Other teachers : 3.50
Instructional aides : 5.69
Licensed administrators : .50
Administrative support : 1
Other staff : 2.75
Average teacher salary ($): 46,411$ | Here: | 46,411$ | | State average from 234 schools: | 44,460$ |
2005 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 7
Other teachers : 3
Instructional aides : 7.50
Licensed administrators : .50
Administrative support : 1
Other staff : 2.30
Average teacher salary ($): 46,598$ | This school: | 46,598$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 42,814$ |
2004 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 7
Other teachers : 2.90
Instructional aides : 6.80
Licensed administrators : .50
Administrative support : 1
Other staff : 2.28
Average teacher salary ($): 45,121$ | Here: | 45,121$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 41,394$ |
Risk Factor Statistics:
Poverty rate (%), July 2006: 17.9% | Here: | 17.9% | | State average from 231 schools: | 10.6% |
Poverty rate (%), Dec. 2005: 16.5% | This school: | 16.5% | | State average from 230 schools: | 10.0% |
Poverty rate town rank, July 2006: 55.0% | Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 232 schools: | 100.0% |
Poverty rate town rank, Dec. 2005: 54.0% | Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 231 schools: | 100.0% |
2007 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 19,304$ | Here: | 19,304$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 21,550$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 225.0 | Here: | 225.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 156.1 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 43,334$ | Here: | 43,334$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 51,309$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 234.0 | Here: | 234.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 156.3 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 80.8% | This school: | 80.8% | | State average from 233 schools: | 72.7% |
2006 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 18,717$ | Here: | 18,717$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 20,888$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 208.0 | Here: | 208.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 141.6 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 42,250$ | Elm Hill School: | 42,250$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 49,082$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 220.0 | Here: | 220.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 155.9 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 82.5% | Here: | 82.5% | | State average from 233 schools: | 75.1% |
2005 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 17,952$ | Here: | 17,952$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 19,835$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 182.0 | Here: | 182.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 136.1 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 39,962$ | Here: | 39,962$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 46,686$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 202.0 | Elm Hill School: | 202.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 139.1 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 80.8% | Elm Hill School: | 80.8% | | State average from 233 schools: | 72.7% |
2007 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 59.0% | Elm Hill School: | 59.0% | | State average from 233 schools: | 63.3% |
Percent student services: 10.0% | Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 230 schools: | 6.1% |
Percent staff services: 4.1% | Here: | 4.1% | | State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 9.1% | Here: | 9.1% | | State average from 233 schools: | 8.8% |
Percent operation: 17.8% | Here: | 17.8% | | State average from 233 schools: | 19.5% |
Financial Expenditures - Elm Hill School Financial Expenditures - Vermont Total PK-12 current expense ($): 18,740,843$ | Elm Hill School: | 18,740,843$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,286,407$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 14,079$ | Here: | 14,079$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 11,797$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 20,559,870$ | This school: | 20,559,870$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 7,256,725$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 1,434,077$ | This school: | 1,434,077$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 1,769,547$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 3,470,334$ | Here: | 3,470,334$ | | State average from 203 schools: | 1,421,788$ |
2006 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 58.9% | Here: | 58.9% | | State average from 233 schools: | 63.4% |
Percent student services: 11.5% | Here: | 11.5% | | State average from 232 schools: | 6.0% |
Percent staff services: 3.9% | Here: | 3.9% | | State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 8.4% | Here: | 8.4% | | State average from 233 schools: | 9.0% |
Percent operation: 17.4% | Here: | 17.4% | | State average from 233 schools: | 18.3% |
Financial Expenditures - Elm Hill School Financial Expenditures - Vermont Total PK-12 current expense ($): 17,772,657$ | Here: | 17,772,657$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,034,752$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 12,895$ | Here: | 12,895$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 11,289$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 19,902,108$ | Elm Hill School: | 19,902,108$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,992,659$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 1,355,523$ | Here: | 1,355,523$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 1,629,679$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 3,368,574$ | This school: | 3,368,574$ | | State average from 203 schools: | 1,339,712$ |
2005 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 59.5% | Here: | 59.5% | | State average from 232 schools: | 63.3% |
Percent student services: 11.2% | Here: | 11.2% | | State average from 230 schools: | 6.2% |
Percent staff services: 3.6% | Here: | 3.6% | | State average from 231 schools: | 3.4% |
Percent leadership services: 8.5% | Here: | 8.5% | | State average from 232 schools: | 9.1% |
Percent operation: 17.2% | Here: | 17.2% | | State average from 232 schools: | 18.1% |
Financial Expenditures - Elm Hill School Financial Expenditures - Vermont Total PK-12 current expense ($): 16,800,290$ | Here: | 16,800,290$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 5,698,600$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 12,473$ | Here: | 12,473$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 10,333$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 18,489,265$ | Here: | 18,489,265$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 6,690,749$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 1,327,435$ | This school: | 1,327,435$ | | State average from 231 schools: | 1,491,304$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 3,063,892$ | Here: | 3,063,892$ | | State average from 203 schools: | 1,228,117$ |
NECAP Results in Elm Hill School
NECAP Math Results - Elm Hill School NECAP Math Results - Vermont
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.49 | Here: | 0.49 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | This school: | 0.21 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.12 | Here: | 0.12 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Female) - Elm Hill School NECAP Math Results (Female) - Vermont
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.20 | Elm Hill School: | 0.20 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.44 | Here: | 0.44 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | This school: | 0.11 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Male) - Elm Hill School NECAP Math Results (Male) - Vermont
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16 | This school: | 0.16 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.54 | Here: | 0.54 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.16 | Elm Hill School: | 0.16 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (FRL) - Elm Hill School NECAP Math Results (FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.06 | This school: | 0.06 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.47 | Here: | 0.47 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.38 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.28 | This school: | 0.28 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.24 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.28 |
NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - Elm Hill School NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26 | Here: | 0.26 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.50 | This school: | 0.50 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.47 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.16 | Here: | 0.16 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08 | This school: | 0.08 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.13 |
2007 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP Reading Results - Elm Hill School NECAP Reading Results - Vermont
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.55 | This school: | 0.55 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.18 | Elm Hill School: | 0.18 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | Elm Hill School: | 0.09 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.11 |
NECAP Reading Results (Female) - Elm Hill School NECAP Reading Results (Female) - Vermont
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.20 | Elm Hill School: | 0.20 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.60 | Here: | 0.60 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.16 | Here: | 0.16 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.04 | This school: | 0.04 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.08 |
NECAP Reading Results (Male) - Elm Hill School NECAP Reading Results (Male) - Vermont
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16 | Elm Hill School: | 0.16 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.12 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.49 | Here: | 0.49 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.22 | Here: | 0.22 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.14 |
NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - Elm Hill School NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.56 | This school: | 0.56 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.16 | Here: | 0.16 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - Elm Hill School NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.54 | This school: | 0.54 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.02 | Elm Hill School: | 0.02 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.08 |
2007 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP writing Results - Elm Hill School NECAP writing Results - Vermont
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26 | This school: | 0.26 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.14 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.32 | Here: | 0.32 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.33 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.32 | Here: | 0.32 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | Here: | 0.11 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.21 |
2006 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 78
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26 | Here: | 0.26 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.47 | This school: | 0.47 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | This school: | 0.20 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06 | Elm Hill School: | 0.06 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.18 |
Female Students tested : 40
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23 | Elm Hill School: | 0.23 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.45 | Here: | 0.45 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.23 | Here: | 0.23 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | This school: | 0.10 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Male Students tested : 38
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.29 | Here: | 0.29 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.50 | This school: | 0.50 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.18 | This school: | 0.18 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.03 | Here: | 0.03 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 28
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.25 | Here: | 0.25 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.36 | Here: | 0.36 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.32 | Elm Hill School: | 0.32 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.28 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 50
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26 | Elm Hill School: | 0.26 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.54 | Elm Hill School: | 0.54 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.14 | Elm Hill School: | 0.14 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06 | Here: | 0.06 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.13 |
2006 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 78
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23 | Elm Hill School: | 0.23 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.15 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.49 | Here: | 0.49 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | This school: | 0.19 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.11 |
Female Students tested : 40
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23 | Elm Hill School: | 0.23 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.53 | Here: | 0.53 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.15 | Here: | 0.15 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.08 |
Male Students tested : 38
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.11 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.45 | This school: | 0.45 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.14 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 28
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | Elm Hill School: | 0.14 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.07 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.57 | This school: | 0.57 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | This school: | 0.21 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.27 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.19 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 50
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.28 | Here: | 0.28 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.44 | Here: | 0.44 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.07 |
2006 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 21
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.57 | This school: | 0.57 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.35 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.23 |
2005 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 70
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.11 | Here: | 0.11 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.46 | Here: | 0.46 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.29 | This school: | 0.29 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Female Students tested : 31
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.42 | This school: | 0.42 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.29 | Here: | 0.29 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.16 | Elm Hill School: | 0.16 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Male Students tested : 39
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.49 | Here: | 0.49 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.28 | Here: | 0.28 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.13 | This school: | 0.13 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 25
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.40 | This school: | 0.40 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.40 | This school: | 0.40 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.20 | Elm Hill School: | 0.20 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 45
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.49 | Here: | 0.49 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.22 | This school: | 0.22 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | Here: | 0.11 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.14 |
2005 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 70
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.47 | Elm Hill School: | 0.47 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.30 | Here: | 0.30 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.24 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.10 |
Female Students tested : 31
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.48 | Here: | 0.48 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.23 | This school: | 0.23 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | This school: | 0.10 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.08 |
Male Students tested : 39
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.10 | This school: | 0.10 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.10 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.46 | Here: | 0.46 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.51 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.36 | This school: | 0.36 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.13 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 25
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.08 | This school: | 0.08 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.06 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.48 | Here: | 0.48 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.36 | This school: | 0.36 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08 | This school: | 0.08 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.17 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 45
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.47 | Elm Hill School: | 0.47 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.27 | Here: | 0.27 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | Elm Hill School: | 0.09 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.08 |
2005 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 15
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.13 | This school: | 0.13 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.53 | Here: | 0.53 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.27 | Here: | 0.27 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.34 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.14 |
|
