
Back to: Jacksonville, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 47.
4359 SPRING PARK RD
Jacksonville, FL 32207
Other nearby schools ratings:
Englewood Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Duval County:  44  Jacksonville:  43  Englewood Elementary School:  47 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Jacksonville, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (904) 7395280 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 16
School number: 871
School type: Elementary
District Name: DUVAL
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 7395316
Magnet Program.
Principal: Gail K Brinson
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
Senate District: 1
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  41%  State average from 963 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  47%  State average from 963 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  71%  State average from 963 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  26%  State average from 962 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  47%  State average from 963 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  68%  State average from 963 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  74%  State average from 963 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  80%  State average from 963 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  454  State average from 963 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 963 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  85%  State average from 963 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  90%  State average from 963 schools:  47% 
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 202
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 208
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 202
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 151
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 151
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 34
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 181
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 181
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  28%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 78
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  45%  State average from 959 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  53%  State average from 959 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  70%  State average from 959 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  38%  State average from 959 schools:  52% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  58%  State average from 959 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  59%  State average from 959 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  73%  State average from 959 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  67%  State average from 959 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  463  State average from 959 schools:  560 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 959 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  84%  State average from 959 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  88%  State average from 959 schools:  46% 
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 199 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 199 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 169
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 170
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 129
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 130
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 144
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 145
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 67
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  60%  State average from 954 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  66%  State average from 954 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 954 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  42%  State average from 954 schools:  48% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  66%  State average from 954 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  83%  State average from 954 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  65%  State average from 954 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  77%  State average from 954 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  545  State average from 954 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 954 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  84%  State average from 954 schools:  51% 
Minority RateHere:  90%  State average from 954 schools:  45% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 141
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 141
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 91
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 120
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 120
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 57
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  86%  State average from 862 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  71%  State average from 862 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  90%  State average from 862 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  49%  State average from 862 schools:  43% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  85%  State average from 862 schools:  70% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  68%  State average from 862 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  75%  State average from 862 schools:  66% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  76%  State average from 862 schools:  68% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  600  State average from 862 schools:  539 
Percent TestedENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 862 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  62%  State average from 865 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  61%  State average from 865 schools:  56% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 213 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  78%  State average from 848 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  71%  State average from 848 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  82%  State average from 848 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  59%  State average from 848 schools:  62% 
Making Math GainsENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  66%  State average from 848 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  66%  State average from 848 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  422  State average from 848 schools:  413 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 848 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  63%  State average from 848 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  60%  State average from 848 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 67
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 210
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 210
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 94
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 94
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 30
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 76
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 76
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 23
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 39
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 127
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 127
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 33
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 33
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  75%  State average from 834 schools:  72% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  70%  State average from 834 schools:  67% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  87%  State average from 834 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  69%  State average from 834 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  67%  State average from 834 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  68%  State average from 834 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  436  State average from 834 schools:  412 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 834 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  100%  State average from 834 schools:  60% 
Minority RateHere:  59%  State average from 832 schools:  54% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1138  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  273  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  44%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  27%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  41%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1312  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  274  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  44%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  19%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  10%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  36%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1295  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  247  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  58%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  19%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  25%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  278  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  40%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  31%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  28%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  9 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1282  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  296  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  51%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1426  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  293  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  21%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  29%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  15%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  50%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1516  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  37%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  12%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  28% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  39%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1082  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  264  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1267  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  266  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 07
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1465  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  277  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  294  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1231  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1279  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  260  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1634  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  3  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 4
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 57%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1123  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  271  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1408  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1474  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  279  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1288  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  297  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1457  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1625  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  56  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  606  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  633  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  15 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  653  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  283  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 83%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1412  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1539  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1542  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1450  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 92
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1669  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1689  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1591  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 98
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  306  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1363  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1494  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1497  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1380  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 117
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1631  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1652  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1529  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 123
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  638  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71
Mean Scale ScoreENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  644  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 67
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  673  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 80
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  628  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  644  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 67
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  664  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  298  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 13
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 84%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 63%
