City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 48.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Juvenile Detention Center School (8.4 miles): | 86 |
| Bartels Middle School (19.0 miles): | 69 |
| Academy At The Farm School (12.5 miles): | 58 |
| Ewes - E-How-Kee Camp. School: | 48 |
| Thomas E. Weightman Middle School (9.2 miles): | 47 |
| Wharton High School (19.6 miles): | 40 |
| Imagine At Land O' Lakes School (19.4 miles): | 28 |
| San Antonio Boys Village - Hrs School (9.8 miles): | 19 |
Ewes - E-How-Kee Camp. School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Hernando County: | 39 |
| Brooksville: | 32 |
| Ewes - E-How-Kee Camp. School: | 48 |
1
Jason Eadler
Feb 3, 2015 @ 7:07 am
I am a former camper from 1984-'85 I was in the Rangers. I am only curious as to whether or not any memorabilia exists from then? Would love to see then and now! Thank you!
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 52
School number: 7121
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 4 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Residential
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Principal: Keith M Philipson
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 5
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 44
Senate District: 15
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 56% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 77% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 48% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 70% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 538 |
| State average from 5 schools: | 581 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 6 schools: | 55% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 6 schools: | 73% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2096 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2076 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1065
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1944
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1935
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1799 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1779 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 917
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1663
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1652
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1084 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1072 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 515
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1003
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 997
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 203 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 196 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 175 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 7 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 89% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 54% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 68% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 532 |
| State average from 5 schools: | 579 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 41% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 92% |
| State average from 6 schools: | 62% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2202 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2185 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2057
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2032
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1895 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1880 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1772
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1750
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 881 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 872 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 813
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 802
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 176
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 83% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 6 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 62% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 57% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 524 |
| State average from 5 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 5 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 39% |
| State average from 6 schools: | 41% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 6 schools: | 64% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2208 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2172 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2051
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2016
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1921 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1891 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1790
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1762
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 870 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 850 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 810
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 791
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 233 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 49%Meeting High Standards in Math: 77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 87%
Meeting High Standards in Science: 42%
Making Reading Gains: 52%
Making Math Gains: 73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 45%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 59%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 494
Percent Tested: 98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 38%
Minority Rate: 91%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2109 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2077 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1850 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1820 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 848 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 830 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 242 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 207 (94%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 20% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 33% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 77% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 42% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 45% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 401 |
| State average from 3 schools: | 269 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 89% |
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 65% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 96% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1981 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1936 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1696 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1657 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 790 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 774 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 9% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 47%Meeting High Standards in Math: 75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 92%
Making Reading Gains: 58%
Making Math Gains: 79%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 413
Percent Tested: 100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 39%
Minority Rate: 89%
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1967 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 320 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 1990 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 62%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1978 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2026 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 87%| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 705 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 71 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 13 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 711 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 69 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1,118
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%| Here: | 306 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1952 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1967 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 63| Here: | 1904 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1967 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 58%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 1981 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 15| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 1967 |
| State average: | 1876 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1957 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 1966 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 40| Here: | 1926 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 2017 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 84%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2022 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 44| Here: | 1978 |
| State average: | 1901 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1043
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 72| Here: | 707 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1088
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 58| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 699 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1042
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 77| EWES - E-HOW-KEE CAMP.: | 719 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1088
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 65| Here: | 714 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1097
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%| Here: | 302 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 82%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2023 Advameg, Inc.