Phone: (386) 842-1062 (make sure to verify first before calling) District Number: 61 School number: 9003 School type: Senior High District Name: SUWANNEE Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12 School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Residential
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 842-1061 Principal: Susan Moffat Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2 House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 11 Senate District: 3 School Web Address: www.suwannee.k12.fl.us/FSBR

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%) Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%) Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:

27%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:

41%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%) Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%) Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5 Number of Students Tested in Math: 5 Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2 Number of Students Tested in Math: 2 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1 Number of Students Tested in Math: 1 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14 Number of Students Tested in Math: 14 Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (97%) Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (97%) Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12 Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:

15%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:

19%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%) Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (97%) Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2 Number of Students Tested in Math: 2 Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2 Number of Students Tested in Math: 2 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7 Number of Students Tested in Math: 7 Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15 Number of Students Tested in Math: 15 Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (96%) Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:

57%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14 Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

FLORIDA SHERIFF'S BOYS RANCH:

26%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:

32%

State average from 27 schools:

59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (97%) Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (97%) Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4 Number of Students Tested in Math: 4 Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3 Number of Students Tested in Math: 3 Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1 Number of Students Tested in Math: 1 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6 Number of Students Tested in Math: 6 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15 Number of Students Tested in Math: 15 Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3 Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9 Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9 Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9 Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9 School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1764

State average:

1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

283

State average:

312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:

53%

State average:

25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

FLORIDA SHERIFF'S BOYS RANCH:

33%

State average:

30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:

7%

State average:

26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

FLORIDA SHERIFF'S BOYS RANCH:

7%

State average:

12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:

13%

State average:

45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:

5

State average:

6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:

9

State average:

11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:

5

State average:

6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:

5

State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1837

State average:

1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

276

State average:

303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:

33%

State average:

17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:

27%

State average:

22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:

33%

State average:

31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:

7%

State average:

21%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

FLORIDA SHERIFF'S BOYS RANCH:

40%

State average:

61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:

3

State average:

5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

FLORIDA SHERIFF'S BOYS RANCH:

2

State average:

4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:

4

State average:

6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:

4

State average:

6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:

3

State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1767

State average:

1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

285

State average:

311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21% % in each Achievement Level 2: 43% % in each Achievement Level 3: 36% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36% Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5 Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12 Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7 Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1832

State average:

1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

283

State average:

299

Percent Passing: 40% % in each Achievement Level 1: 50% % in each Achievement Level 2: 40% % in each Achievement Level 3: 10% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10% Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3 Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9 Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10 Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

248

State average:

299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 71% % in each Achievement Level 2: 14% % in each Achievement Level 3: 14% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14% Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5 Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5 Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5 Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1793

State average:

1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

294

State average:

316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36% % in each Achievement Level 2: 7% % in each Achievement Level 3: 57% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57% Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5 Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5 Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5 Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4 Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1971

State average:

1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

320

State average:

321

Percent Passing: 100% % in each Achievement Level 2: 40% % in each Achievement Level 3: 50% % in each Achievement Level 4: 10% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60% Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6 Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5 Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3 Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5 Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results: Number of Students - Combined: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results: Number of Students - Combined: 15

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:

4

State average from 27 schools:

59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7% Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27% Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13% Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33% Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13% Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7% Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 67%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results: Number of Students - Combined: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1511

State average:

1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

260

State average:

311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43% % in each Achievement Level 2: 21% % in each Achievement Level 3: 29% % in each Achievement Level 4: 7% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36% Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5 Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8 Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5 Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1808

State average:

1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

291

State average:

307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38% % in each Achievement Level 2: 54% % in each Achievement Level 3: 8% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8% Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4 Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9 Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6 Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1628

State average:

1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

FLORIDA SHERIFF'S BOYS RANCH:

266

State average:

309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43% % in each Achievement Level 2: 43% % in each Achievement Level 3: 14% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14% Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3 Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4 Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3 Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2 Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:

1860

State average:

1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:

283

State average:

299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23% % in each Achievement Level 2: 31% % in each Achievement Level 3: 46% Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46% Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4 Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3 Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4 Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3 Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:

1

State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:

3

State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:

1

State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:

7

State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:

14

State average:

201

Mean Scale Score

Here:

620

State average from 2487 schools:

682

Median NPR

Here:

16

State average:

66

Literary (max 18)

Here:

9

State average:

14

Informational (max 18)

Here:

7

State average:

12

Functional (max 18)

Here:

6

State average:

12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:

5

State average:

9

Interpretation (max 20)

FLORIDA SHERIFF'S BOYS RANCH:

8

State average:

14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:

5

State average:

9

Strategies (max 10)

FLORIDA SHERIFF'S BOYS RANCH:

3

State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:

5

State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:

10

State average:

273

Mean Scale Score

Here:

687

State average from 2275 schools:

694

Median NPR

Here:

55

State average:

61

Literary (max 18)

Here:

13

State average:

13

Informational (max 18)

Here:

11

State average:

11

Functional (max 18)

Here:

11

State average:

11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:

7

State average:

7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:

14

State average:

14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:

9

State average:

9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:

5

State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:

8

State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results: Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results: Number of Students - Combined: 7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results: Number of Students - Combined: 10

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:

244

State average from 27 schools:

59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 70% % in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 10% % in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10% % in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10% Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20% Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6 Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4 Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3 Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:

3

State average:

59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 10% Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 30% Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20% Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20% Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10% Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10% Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 40%