Franklin County Learning Center School in Eastpoint, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

731 US HWY 98
Eastpoint, FL 32320

Show street view No street view available for this location

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Eastpoint, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 670-1744 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 19
School number: 23
School type: Senior High
District Name: FRANKLIN
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 670-1743
Principal: Teresa Jones
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 6
Senate District: 6
School Web Address: www.franklincountyschools.org

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

1685
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

46%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

15%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

46%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

60%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

7%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

1819
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1802
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

290
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1730
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1868
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1890
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 33%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1826
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1853
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

5
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

22
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

47
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEARNING CENTER:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2017 Advameg, Inc.