
Back to: Quincy, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 44.
500 W KING ST
Quincy, FL 32351
Other nearby schools ratings:
Gadsden Elementary Magnet School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Gadsden County:  39  Quincy:  45  Gadsden Elementary Magnet School:  44 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Quincy, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (850) 6277557 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 20
School number: 101
School type: Elementary
District Name: GADSDEN
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 6276695
Magnet School.
Principal: Deshuana Jackson
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
Senate District: 6
School Web Address: http://www.gcps.k12.fl.us/
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  74%  State average from 5 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  68%  State average from 5 schools:  80% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  80%  State average from 5 schools:  80% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  54%  State average from 5 schools:  58% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  64%  State average from 5 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  63%  State average from 5 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  55%  State average from 5 schools:  57% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  57%  State average from 5 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  515  State average from 5 schools:  551 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 5 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  56%  State average from 5 schools:  62% 
Minority RateHere:  22%  State average from 5 schools:  34% 
Region: 1
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 597 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 596 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 145
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 580
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 563
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 579
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 560
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 464 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 433
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 449
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 430
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 93
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 93
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 326 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 303
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 301
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 82
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  76%  State average from 5 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  62%  State average from 5 schools:  78% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  94%  State average from 5 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  51%  State average from 5 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  71%  State average from 5 schools:  63% 
Making Math GainsHere:  64%  State average from 5 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  68%  State average from 5 schools:  63% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  55%  State average from 5 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  541  State average from 5 schools:  548 
Percent TestedGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 5 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  55%  State average from 5 schools:  59% 
Minority RateHere:  24%  State average from 5 schools:  34% 
Region: 1
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 601 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 600 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 570
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 543
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 569
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 543
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 454 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 454 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 421
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 421
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 88
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 331 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 330 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 309
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 289
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 288
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 72
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  68%  State average from 6 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  60%  State average from 6 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  75%  State average from 6 schools:  79% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  33%  State average from 6 schools:  48% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  60%  State average from 6 schools:  62% 
Making Math GainsHere:  70%  State average from 6 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  53%  State average from 6 schools:  57% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  68%  State average from 6 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  487  State average from 6 schools:  530 
Percent TestedHere:  98%  State average from 6 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  52%  State average from 6 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  24%  State average from 6 schools:  42% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 632 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 631 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 168
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 607
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 578
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 607
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 579
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 480 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 127
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 463
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 443
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 462
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 443
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 103
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 326 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 325 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 297
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 310
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 297
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 78
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 84%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 69%
Meeting High Standards in Science: 26%
Making Reading Gains: 91%
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains: 73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 91%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 73%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 582
Percent Tested: 100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 59%
Minority Rate: 96%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 79%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 81%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 73%
Making Reading Gains: 61%
Making Math Gains: 58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 413
Percent Tested: 100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 60%
Minority Rate: 93%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 19
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 57
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 57
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 48
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 48
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 30
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 30
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1433  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  51%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  31%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  86%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  1634  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  42%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  28%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  77%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1684  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  16%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  12%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  28%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  1753  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  14%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  28%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  70%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1825  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  19%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  67%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1938  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  26%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  45%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  16%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 5GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  4%  State average:  3% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  66%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1969  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  12%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  34%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  54%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  2037  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  302 
Percent PassingHere:  73%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  12%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  51%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  24%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  37%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  20%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  34%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  12%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  1%  State average:  4% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  48%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  35%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  7%  State average:  8% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  50%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  20%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  30%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  50%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1586  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  362  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  37%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  20%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  92%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1622  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  338  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  40%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  38%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  87%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  5  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1664  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  17%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  27%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  63%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  1699  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  20%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  16%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  56%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  1756  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  23%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  22%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  14%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  54%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1947  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  26%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  16%  State average:  10% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  74%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1953  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  29%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  66%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2067  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  344  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  96%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 2GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  6%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  58%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  94%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  8  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1415  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1678  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 59%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1702  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  1700  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1840  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1923  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2012  State average:  1907 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  1975  State average:  1921 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  299 
Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1521  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  348  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1588  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1698  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1624  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1800  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1892  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2011  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2004  State average:  1972 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  321 
Percent Passing: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 52
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 83%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 126
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 85%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 89%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1436  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1575  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1623  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1684  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  306  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1798  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1846  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2003  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1948  State average:  1935 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  302 
Percent Passing: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1533  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  350  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1490  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1663  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1646  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1780  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1887  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2003  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1987  State average:  1984 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  323 
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  638  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Literary (max 18)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  13  State average:  13 
Informational (max 18)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  14  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  640  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Median NPRGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  59  State average:  69 
Functional (max 18)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  12  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  155  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  669  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  162  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  670  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Literary (max 18)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  146  State average:  201 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  684  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Informational (max 18)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  12  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  174  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  682  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Informational (max 18)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  12  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  10  State average:  10 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  707  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  719  State average from 2096 schools:  709 
Literary (max 18)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  15  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  16  State average:  15 
Critical Analysis (max 12)GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  11  State average:  10 
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 41
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  257  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 27%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 46%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 178
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  263  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 26%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 71%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 59
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  308  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 83%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1397  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  1658  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500GADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  333  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1644  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1537  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 107
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1797  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1769  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1623  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 146
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1915  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  348  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1915  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1756  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 159
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1527  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  349  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1521  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1518  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1446  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 73
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1704  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1693  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1560  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 134
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1814  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  343  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1814  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1745  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 69
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  658  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 79
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  652  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  694  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 89
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale ScoreGADSDEN ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:  703  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 87
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 9
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  646  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  657  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  669  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  703  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 10
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  309  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 24%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 65%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 15
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 71%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 47%
