|
Back to: Ganado, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 25.
Address: Highway 264
Ganado, WI 86505
Grade span: 7-8
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 05:00 PM
Principal: Mrs. Lucinda Swedberg
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 755-1220
Fax: (928) 755-1298
Homepage: www.ganado.k12.az.us
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 8
- Grade 7
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: |  16.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: |  22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 2
Enrollment In 2002: 518
Enrollment In 2003: 332
Enrollment In 2004: 357
Enrollment In 2005: 345
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 77.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 87.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 29.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 9.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 24.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 10.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 24.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 7.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 24.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 7.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: No
Grade 8
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 166
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.74% |
Female Tested: 87
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Male Tested: 79
Male Percent Tested: 93%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 28.33% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 154
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 23.55% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 166
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 19.98% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 154
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 511 schools: | 32.52% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 18.95% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 505 schools: | 34.30% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 14.84% |
Female Tested: 67
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 28.98% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 432 schools: | 19.82% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 36.30% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 16.07% |
Male Tested: 87
Male Percent Tested: 94%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 447 schools: | 35.90% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 433 schools: | 18.14% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 438 schools: | 32.58% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 384 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 138
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 97%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 28.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 19.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 36.41% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 16.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 123
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 47.34% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 362 schools: | 20.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 26.22% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 4.0% | | State average from 286 schools: | 6.56% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 31
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 430 schools: | 23.06% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 17.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 8: | 29.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 39.57% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 186
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 11.41% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 534 schools: | 25.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 533 schools: | 57.36% |
Female Tested: 91
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 61.28% |
Male Tested: 95
Male Percent Tested: 99%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 14.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 26.68% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 53.89% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 24
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 266 schools: | 40.49% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 269 schools: | 37.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 162
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 515 schools: | 23.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 62.13% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 84
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 208 schools: | 43.12% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
| Grade 8: | 36.0% | | State average from 204 schools: | 28.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 133
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 94%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.77% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 45.81% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 53
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 6.44% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 18.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 66.24% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 373 schools: | 8.84% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 23.75% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 418 schools: | 7.90% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 205 schools: | 28.69% |
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 17.95% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 162
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Female Tested: 75
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 61.61% |
Male Tested: 87
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 144
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 136
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 36.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 45.52% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 67.32% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 13.56% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 8.23% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 6.84% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 169
All Students Percent Tested: 97%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 38.22% |
Female Tested: 88
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Male Tested: 81
Male Percent Tested: 95%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 37.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 156
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 36.74% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 169
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 32.42% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 155
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 508 schools: | 37.65% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 507 schools: | 36.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 8: | 3.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 16.12% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 376 schools: | 11.29% |
Female Tested: 68
Female Percent Tested: 99%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 441 schools: | 36.01% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 38.49% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 1.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 16.80% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 1.0% | | State average from 311 schools: | 10.79% |
Male Tested: 87
Male Percent Tested: 94%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 74.0% | | State average from 438 schools: | 39.01% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 446 schools: | 34.82% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 16.08% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 138
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 97%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 492 schools: | 34.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 495 schools: | 38.20% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 453 schools: | 17.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 372 schools: | 12.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 125
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 74.0% | | State average from 370 schools: | 52.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 33.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 318 schools: | 10.20% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 30
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 427 schools: | 27.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 434 schools: | 38.55% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 187
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 63.0% | | State average from 518 schools: | 21.77% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 527 schools: | 18.14% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 530 schools: | 47.74% |
Female Tested: 90
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 64.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 20.03% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 19.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 49.54% |
Male Tested: 97
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 61.0% | | State average from 453 schools: | 23.40% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.25% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 46.44% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 25
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 279 schools: | 63.98% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 260 schools: | 18.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 162
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 16.19% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 18.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 51.93% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 85
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 61.0% | | State average from 218 schools: | 44.96% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 217 schools: | 24.55% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 216 schools: | 28.37% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 135
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 95%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 64.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 32.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 388 schools: | 22.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 391 schools: | 39.93% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 52
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 58.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 13.60% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 427 schools: | 15.05% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 19.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 53.96% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 162
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 21.20% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 555 schools: | 18.93% |
All Students Meets Standards
| This school: | 22.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 47.62% |
Female Tested: 75
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 454 schools: | 19.66% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 468 schools: | 19.87% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 49.10% |
Male Tested: 87
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 22.61% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 486 schools: | 17.93% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 490 schools: | 46.56% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 144
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 526 schools: | 17.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 19.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 50.60% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 136
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 30.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 37.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 23.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 402 schools: | 40.55% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 13.96% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 450 schools: | 15.37% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 52.99% |
Grade 7
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 187
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 9.98% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 25.34% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 572 schools: | 58.10% |
Female Tested: 75
Female Percent Tested: 95%
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 62.33% |
Male Tested: 112
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 28.21% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 7: | 28.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 54.12% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 171
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 7.29% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 23.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 62.28% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 155
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 47.98% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 32
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 94%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 374 schools: | 5.90% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 34.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 66.24% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 7.67% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 22.45% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 378 schools: | 9.27% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 8.38% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 34.65% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 372 schools: | 11.51% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 187
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 15.30% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 17.48% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 570 schools: | 52.46% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 15.45% |
Female Tested: 75
Female Percent Tested: 95%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 13.23% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 466 schools: | 17.55% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 7: | 28.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 54.67% |
Male Tested: 112
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 17.35% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 17.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 50.48% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 15.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 171
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 11.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 542 schools: | 16.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 559 schools: | 55.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 500 schools: | 16.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 155
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 408 schools: | 23.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 47.75% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 339 schools: | 6.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 32
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 94%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 429 schools: | 9.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 448 schools: | 12.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 56.30% |
|
