|
Back to: Ganado, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 30.
Address: P.O. Box 1757 Hwy 264
Ganado, WI 86505
Grade span: K-3
Schedule: 07:30 AM to 04:30 PM
Principal: Mrs. Helen Aseret
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 755-1020
Fax: (928) 755-1085
Homepage: www.ganado.k12.az.us
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: |  1.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: |  22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| This school: | 94.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Enrollment In 2002: 351
Enrollment In 2003: 479
Enrollment In 2004: 493
Enrollment In 2005: 430
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 89.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 87.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 30.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 32.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 30.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 35.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 30.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 22.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 30.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 22.00
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 3
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 120
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 23.28% |
Female Tested: 66
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 21.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 12.64% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 16.43% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 45.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 47.77% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 27.03% |
Male Tested: 54
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 16.63% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 18.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 46.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 46.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 111
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 24.53% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 10
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 10%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 100
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 20.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 22.00% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 20
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 8.72% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 13.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 742 schools: | 48.49% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 31.38% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 2.0% | | State average from 753 schools: | 21.15% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 615 schools: | 14.46% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 126
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 10.31% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 25.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 925 schools: | 54.83% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 3.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 11.29% |
Female Tested: 60
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 24.30% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 56.93% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 2.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 13.46% |
Male Tested: 66
Male Percent Tested: 94%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 12.75% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 27.38% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 52.84% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 11.07% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 121
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 8.70% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 24.05% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 58.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 12.34% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 88
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 43.12% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.06% |
Limited English Proficient Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 109 schools: | 3.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 101
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 94%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 35.14% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 46.72% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 489 schools: | 5.11% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 25
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 5.76% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 742 schools: | 16.32% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 63.01% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 618 schools: | 9.81% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 22.22% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 111
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 40.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 879 schools: | 11.34% |
Female Tested: 55
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 660 schools: | 9.08% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Male Tested: 56
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 13.29% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 45.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 32.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 2.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 10.42% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 103
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 41.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 871 schools: | 12.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 103
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 45.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 600 schools: | 5.24% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 119
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 30.01% |
Female Tested: 65
Female Percent Tested: 96%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 14.62% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 24.99% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 21.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 33.20% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 30.75% |
Male Tested: 54
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 16.25% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 23.57% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 32.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 112
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 31.49% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 10
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 10%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 100
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 20.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 661 schools: | 30.12% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 19.99% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 9.73% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 732 schools: | 33.73% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 128
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 10.99% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 51.29% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 863 schools: | 20.62% |
Female Tested: 59
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 11.33% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 18.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 23.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 52.46% |
Male Tested: 69
Male Percent Tested: 99%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 12.22% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 18.70% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 50.15% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 22.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 119
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 97%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 9.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 17.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 53.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Grade 3: | 1.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 22.42% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 86
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 98%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 30.30% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 44.63% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 102
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 94%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 15.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 25.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 50.39% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 582 schools: | 6.95% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 12.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 762 schools: | 52.33% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 31.11% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 111
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 21.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Female Tested: 55
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 19.32% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 18.74% |
Male Tested: 56
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 830 schools: | 19.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 103
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 8.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 46.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 103
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
|
