George Washington Carver Middle School in Coral Gables, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 96.

4901 LINCOLN DR
Coral Gables, FL 33133

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (13.4 miles):

98
George Washington Carver Middle School:

96
Jane S. Roberts K-8 Center School (10.9 miles):

74
Miami Palmetto Senior High School (5.7 miles):

60
Centennial Middle School (11.6 miles):

47
Henry H. Filer Middle School (8.8 miles):

34
Jorge Mas Canosa Middle School (13.4 miles):

20
Downtown Miami Charter School (5.1 miles):

7
George Washington Carver Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Coral Gables:

65
George Washington Carver Middle:

96

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA






Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 444-7388 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6071
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 529-5148
Magnet School.
Principal: Libia A Gonzalez
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 113
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: http://carver.dade.k12.fl.us/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

97%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

90%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

95%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

730
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 992 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 992 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 282
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 978
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 955
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 978
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 955
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 278 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 278 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 265
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 252
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 265
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 252
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 615 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 615 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 184
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 614
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 605
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 614
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 605
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 307
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 305
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 307
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 305
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

91%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

730
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 919 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 919 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 288
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 902
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 889
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 902
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 889
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 227 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 557 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 557 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 166
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 556
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 554
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 556
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 554
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 262 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 262 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 262
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 262
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

98%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

100%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

90%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

86%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

91%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

733
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 904 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 904 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 276
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 901
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 879
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 901
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 879
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 509 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 509 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 146
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 507
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 503
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 507
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 503
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 247 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 247 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

95%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

94%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

85%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

86%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

677
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

9%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 318 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 319 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 306
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 294 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 295 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 283
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

94%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

92%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

494
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

8%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 333 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 333 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 76
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 327
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 328
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 311 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 71

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 306
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 307
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 50
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 51
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

95%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

509
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

6%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

358
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

53%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

96%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1773
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1838
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2027
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

368
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

46%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

29%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

97%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2134
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

379
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

96%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2130
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

361
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

42%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

93%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

9
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

354
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

49%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

11
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

372
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

52%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

12
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

10
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

11
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1678
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

382
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

1%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

31%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

99%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1654
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

345
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

44%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1795
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

42%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

83%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1950
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

374
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

30%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

95%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2068
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

1%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

43%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

40%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

99%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2075
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

1%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

40%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

99%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

9
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

10
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1574
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1789
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

355
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 04

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1830
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1973
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

358
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2076
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

368
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 98%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2172
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

370
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

383
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 11
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 12

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1605
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1756
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1828
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

367
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1921
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

367
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2044
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2095
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

371
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 50%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 10
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 10

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 75
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 289
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 21%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 18%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1578
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1766
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1772
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1965
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2110
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 98%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2108
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 10

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

385
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 11
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 11
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 11

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1623
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

370
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1719
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1750
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

350
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1907
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

364
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2065
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

374
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 41%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2097
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

371
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 48%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

69
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

655
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

78
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

670
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

82
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

84
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

85
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

315
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

707
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

88
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

18
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

312
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

726
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

93
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

277
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

730
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

92
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 79
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

332
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 277
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

375
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 94%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 17%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 21%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1603
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1760
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1767
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1612
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 154

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1885
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

352
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1889
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1713
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 176

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2005
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2007
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1888
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 119

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

359
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1656
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

377
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1664
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1669
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1604
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 65

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1811
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1812
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1676
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 135

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1916
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1916
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1806
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 110

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 82
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale Score
GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

663
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 87
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
Here:

709
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 89
Literary (max 18): 17
Informational (max 18): 16
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 88
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
Here:

709
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 89
Number Sense (max 10): 8
Operations (max 12): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 73
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

322
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 82%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2017 Advameg, Inc.