
Back to: Pahokee, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.
1200 E MAIN ST
Pahokee, FL 33476
Other nearby schools ratings:
Glades Academy Elementary Inc School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Palm Beach County:  45  Pahokee:  24  Glades Academy Elementary Inc:  1 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Pahokee, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (561) 9249402 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 3382
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 9249279
Principal: Don Zumpano
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 5 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 84
Senate District: 39
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  74%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  85%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingGLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  58%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  61%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  78%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  96%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  78%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  96%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  626  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateGLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  100%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  50%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  36%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  59%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  80%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  50%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  80%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  50%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)GLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  498  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientGLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 27
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 27
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 20
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 20
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1082  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  264  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  46%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  54%  State average:  33% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  54%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1522  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  80%  State average:  32% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveGLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  80%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9GLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17GLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  8  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2GLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  2  State average:  2 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  1371  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  31%  State average:  31% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  69%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1594  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  47%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4GLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  40%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  93%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1154  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  276  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1165  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  271  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1009  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  252  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1339  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  278  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1111  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  259  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1509  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 90%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  594  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  639  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Literary (max 18)GLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  14  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)GLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  6  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsGLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  8  State average:  101 
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 9
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  878  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500GLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  231  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1056  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  247  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale ScoreGLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  580  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 18
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 8
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale ScoreGLADES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC:  584  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 28
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 8
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
