Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Grandview Hills Elementary School in Austin, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 77
Address
 12024 VISTA PARKE DR
Austin, TX 78726
Telephone
(512) 570-6800
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
77
Students
464
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
33.7
Free lunch eligible students
68
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
16
School district
LEANDER ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CANYON CREEK EL (2.3 miles):

100
STEINER RANCH EL (3.1 miles):

98
FOUR POINTS MIDDLE (1.9 miles):

97
VANDEGRIFT H S (2.1 miles):

92
RIVER PLACE EL (1.8 miles):

89
CYPRESS EL (3.6 miles):

80
CEDAR PARK H S (3.9 miles):

79
Grandview Hills Elementary School:

77
PURPLE SAGE EL (3.5 miles):

71
Grandview Hills Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Travis County:

57
Austin:

57
Grandview Hills Elementary School:

77

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 464
Enrollment in 2015: 478
Enrollment in 2014: 499
Enrollment in 2013: 519
Enrollment in 2012: 511
Enrollment in 2011: 571
Enrollment in 2010: 508
Enrollment in 2009: 361
Enrollment in 2008: 252

Grandview Hills Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students17686276708685464
Female students7352735324444224
Male students10333541384241240
American Indian/Alaska Native students1 - 1 - - - - 2
Asian students67610610550
Hispanic students4151221191919109
Black students142437324
White students5353839364957259
Two or More Races students - 73261120

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 17
Kindergarten enrollment: 68
1st grade enrollment: 62
2nd grade enrollment: 76
3rd grade enrollment: 70
4th grade enrollment: 86
5th grade enrollment: 85

Grandview Hills Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 224 (48.3%)
Grandview Hills Elementary School:

48.3%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 240 (51.7%)
Grandview Hills Elementary School:

51.7%
State:

50.1%

Grandview Hills Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Grandview Hills Elementary School:

0.4%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 50 (10.8%)
Here:

10.8%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 109 (23.5%)
Here:

23.5%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 24 (5.2%)
Here:

5.2%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 259 (55.8%)
Here:

55.8%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 20 (4.3%)
Here:

4.3%
Texas:

2.1%

Grandview Hills Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 84 (18.1%)
Here:

18.1%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 68 (14.7%)
Grandview Hills Elementary School:

14.7%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 16 (3.4%)
School:

3.4%
Texas:

6.2%

Grandview Hills Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 33.7

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1.9
Number of FTE school counselors: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Grandview Hills Elementary School:

13.8
State:

15.6

Grandview Hills Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,771,156
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 30.4 (Salary Expenditures: $1,448,454)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $19,088)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4.5 (Salary Expenditures: $162,266)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $141,348)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,752,068
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,006,335
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,620,942
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3.9 (Salary Expenditures: $81,779)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4.5 (Salary Expenditures: $162,266)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $141,348)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $1,924,556

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic13
  • American Indian2
  • Asian7
  • Black2
  • White2
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 26 (male: 17, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 41 (male: 26, female: 15)
  • Hispanic: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Asian: 4 (all female)
  • White: 26 (male: 19, female: 7)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian2
  • White22
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 39 (male: 16, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

2.9%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Grandview Hills Elementary School:

6.5%
Texas:

6.1%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian7
  • Black4
  • White46
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 72 (male: 43, female: 29)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 46 (male: 26, female: 20)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

155.2
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,516
  • Males1,532
  • Females1,502
  • Hispanic1,484
  • Asian1,732
  • Black1,463
  • White1,504
Math Average Scale Score:

1,516
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 70
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 70

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 34%

16%
30%
20%
34%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,532, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 39%)
21%
18%
22%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,502, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 30%)
11%
40%
19%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,484, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 31%)
23%
39%
7%
31%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,732, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 83%)
17%
83%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,463, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,504, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 30%)
16%
27%
27%
30%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,505
  • Males1,499
  • Females1,511
  • Hispanic1,495
  • Asian1,648
  • Black1,424
  • White1,514
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,505
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 70
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 70

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.5 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 46%

14%
29%
11%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,499, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 39%)
15%
33%
13%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,511, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 51%)
14%
24%
11%
51%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,495, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 38%)
8%
38%
16%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,424, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 20%)
30%
40%
10%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,514, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 54%)
16%
22%
8%
54%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,604
  • Males1,613
  • Females1,595
  • Hispanic1,587
  • Asian1,596
  • Black1,483
  • White1,634
Math Average Scale Score:

1,604
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 82
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

26%
17%
18%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 46%)
23%
13%
18%
46%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,595, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 33%)
28%
21%
18%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,587, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 35%)
27%
15%
23%
35%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,596, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 43%)
43%
14%
43%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,483, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
60%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,634, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 48%)
18%
18%
17%
48%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,561
  • Males1,572
  • Females1,550
  • Hispanic1,548
  • Asian1,544
  • Black1,454
  • White1,584
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,561
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 82
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

22%
22%
24%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 38%)
21%
17%
24%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 26%)
23%
26%
25%
26%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,548, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 35%)
23%
31%
11%
35%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 29%)
43%
14%
14%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,454, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
60%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 35%)
15%
17%
33%
35%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,875
  • Males3,788
  • Females3,957
  • Hispanic3,935
  • Asian3,503
  • Black3,397
  • White3,977
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,875
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 81
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 81

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

28%
18%
39%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,788, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 8%)
26%
20%
46%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,957, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 21%)
31%
14%
34%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,935, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 23%)
31%
7%
39%
23%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 3,503, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
43%
28%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,397, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,977, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 15%)
21%
25%
39%
15%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,646
  • Males1,666
  • Females1,627
  • Hispanic1,651
  • Asian1,868
  • Black1,524
  • White1,626
  • Multirace1,703
Math Average Scale Score:

1,646
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 84
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 84

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

12%
31%
28%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,666, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 30%)
10%
22%
38%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 27%)
14%
38%
21%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
10%
23%
34%
33%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,868, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 86%)
14%
86%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
50%
25%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 21%)
5%
41%
33%
21%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,703, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
14%
29%
14%
43%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,623
  • Males1,606
  • Females1,638
  • Hispanic1,624
  • Asian1,749
  • Black1,487
  • White1,620
  • Multirace1,709
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,623
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 83
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 84

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 37%

16%
19%
28%
37%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 33%)
20%
22%
25%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 42%)
12%
16%
30%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,624, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 25%)
10%
15%
50%
25%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,749, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 71%)
14%
15%
71%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,487, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
50%
12%
25%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 41%)
15%
21%
23%
41%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,709, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 57%)
29%
14%
57%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,882
  • Males3,956
  • Females3,815
  • Hispanic3,877
  • Asian4,473
  • Black3,370
  • White3,853
  • Multirace4,216
Science Average Scale Score:

3,882
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 84
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 84

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.1 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

26%
31%
23%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,956, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
20%
30%
25%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,815, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 16%)
32%
32%
20%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,877, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 24%)
24%
33%
19%
24%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,473, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 57%)
43%
57%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,370, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
63%
25%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,853, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 15%)
28%
34%
23%
15%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,216, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
43%
28%
29%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White16
  • IDEA4
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 29 (male: 12, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

62.5
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Austin, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2019 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents