Hilliard Middle-Senior High School in Hilliard, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 50.

1 FLASHES AVE
Hilliard, FL 32046

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Tiger S.H.O.P School (15.9 miles):	87
West Nassau County High School (10.6 miles):	77
Callahan Middle School (9.6 miles):	73
Yulee High School (19.4 miles):	55
Hilliard Middle-Senior High School:	50

Hilliard Middle-Senior High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Nassau County:	48
Hilliard:	53
Hilliard Middle-Senior High:	50

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (904) 491-7940 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 45
School number: 151
School type: Senior High
District Name: NASSAU
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 845-7662
Principal: Dale Braddock
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
Senate District: 5

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	85%
State average from 133 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	89%
State average from 133 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	81%
State average from 133 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	46%
State average from 133 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 133 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	78%
State average from 132 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	64%
State average from 133 schools:	57%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	81%
State average from 133 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	594
State average from 133 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 132 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	79%
State average from 137 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

Here:	23%
State average from 137 schools:	53%

Region: 1

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	81%
State average from 141 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	84%
State average from 133 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 139 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	44%
State average from 133 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 133 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	85%
State average from 136 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 133 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	80%
State average from 133 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	601
State average from 133 schools:	540

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 134 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	75%
State average from 132 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	29%
State average from 139 schools:	52%

Region: 1

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 252 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 252 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	77%
State average from 124 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	76%
State average from 124 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	84%
State average from 125 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	30%
State average from 122 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	65%
State average from 122 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	84%
State average from 122 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	55%
State average from 122 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	77%
State average from 122 schools:	70%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	548
State average from 122 schools:	535

Percent Tested

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	100%
State average from 124 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	71%
State average from 126 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	27%
State average from 125 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 63 schools:	49%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	76%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	96%
State average from 63 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	36%
State average from 63 schools:	37%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	53%
State average from 63 schools:	53%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 63 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	48%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	63%
State average from 63 schools:	63%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	512
State average from 63 schools:	461

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 63 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	34%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	9%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 593 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 593 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 253
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 568
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 570
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 540 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 540 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 229
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 519
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 521
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 62 schools:	49%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	70%
State average from 62 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 62 schools:	82%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 62 schools:	57%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 62 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	68%
State average from 62 schools:	62%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	420
State average from 62 schools:	371

Percent Tested

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	98%
State average from 62 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	33%
State average from 63 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	8%
State average from 63 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 609 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 610 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 204
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 575
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 576
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 561 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 562 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 187

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 531
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 532
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 73
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 207
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 208
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 37
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 106
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 107
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	48%
State average from 52 schools:	48%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 52 schools:	56%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	89%
State average from 53 schools:	79%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	51%
State average from 53 schools:	54%

Making Math Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 53 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 53 schools:	59%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	377
State average from 53 schools:	362

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 53 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	30%
State average from 53 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	7%
State average from 52 schools:	51%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1356
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	309
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1614
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	30%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	75%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1817
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	5%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	21%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1856
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	79%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1917
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	16%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	30%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	75%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1987
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1978
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	29%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	51%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	2026
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	66%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	25%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	47%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	72%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	21%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	41%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	5%

% in each Achievement Level 5

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1%
State average:	1%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	37%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1370
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	43%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	4%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1644
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	343
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	37%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	30%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	83%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1780
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	357
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	28%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	17%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1812
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	23%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	72%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1914
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1976
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	341
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	33%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	22%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	79%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1960
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	69%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2025
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	88%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	42%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	6
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1389
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1591
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1794
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1832
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1913
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1969
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1988
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1987
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	311
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1424
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1610
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1779
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1829
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1907
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1956
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1982
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	319
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2007
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 114

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 393

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 453

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1345
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1547
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1835
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	343
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1800
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1883
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1950
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1981
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1990
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1350
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1611
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1793
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	359
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1792
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1908
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1952
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1968
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2000
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	130
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	620
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	50
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	115
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	649
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	67
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	102
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	690
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	87
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	459
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	685
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	75
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	390
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	698
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	79
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	407
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	705
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	78
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	487
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	706
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	73
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	13
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	448
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	717
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	74
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 106

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	293
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 58%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 410

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	307
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 460

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	310
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1735
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1741
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1739
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 2

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1810
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1832
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1755
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 77

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1850
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1858
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1803
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1949
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1950
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1857
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 93

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1954
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	1950
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1960
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -10

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	291
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	287
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1746
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1751
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1742
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 10

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1868
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1886
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1773
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 113

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1874
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1876
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1782
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 94

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1944
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1951
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1898
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 53

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	2000
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1998
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1944
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 54

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 105

Mean Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	683
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 95

Mean Scale Score

Here:	680
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 131

Mean Scale Score

Here:	686
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 124

Mean Scale Score

Here:	703
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 115

Mean Scale Score

Here:	694
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 52
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 105

Mean Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	681
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 95

Mean Scale Score

HILLIARD MIDDLE-SENIOR HIGH:	696
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 131

Mean Scale Score

Here:	696
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 124

Mean Scale Score

Here:	710
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 72
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 115

Mean Scale Score

Here:	715
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 67
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 132

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	304
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 93%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 117

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	303
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 91%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY