Isd/Local Center Programs School in Stanton, MI

Back to: Stanton, MI, Michigan, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Michigan forum.

621 NEW STREET
Stanton, MI 48888

County: Montcalm
Grade span: KG - 12

Phone: (989) 831-2222 (make sure to verify first before calling)

2004 Student Enrollment: 88

Female Enrollment : 31
Male Enrollment : 57

Kindergarten Enrollment : 8
1st Grade Enrollment : 8
2nd Grade Enrollment : 1
3rd Grade Enrollment : 1
4th Grade Enrollment : 4
5th Grade Enrollment : 5
6th Grade Enrollment : 9
7th Grade Enrollment : 14
8th Grade Enrollment : 10
9th Grade Enrollment : 9
10th Grade Enrollment : 6
11th Grade Enrollment : 6
12th Grade Enrollment : 7

Kindergarten Female Enrollment : 3
1st Grade Female Enrollment : 1
2nd Grade Enrollment : 1
5th Grade Female Enrollment : 1
6th Grade Female Enrollment : 5
7th Grade Female Enrollment : 4
8th Grade Female Enrollment : 2
9th Grade Female Enrollment : 4
10th Grade Female Enrollment : 4
11th Grade Female Enrollment : 2
12th Grade Female Enrollment : 4

Kindergarten Male Enrollment : 5
1st Grade Male Enrollment : 7
3rd Grade Female Male Enrollment : 1
4th Grade Female Male Enrollment : 4
5th Grade Female Male Enrollment : 4
6th Grade Male Enrollment : 4
7th Grade Male Enrollment : 10
8th Grade Male Enrollment : 8
9th Grade Male Enrollment : 5
10th Grade Male Enrollment : 2
11th Grade Male Enrollment : 4
12th Grade Male Enrollment : 3

White Enrollment (%): 90.9%

Here:	90.9%
State average from 3582 schools:	72.3%

Black Enrollment (%): 2.3%

Here:	2.3%
State average from 3582 schools:	19.3%

Hispanic Enrollment (%): 3.4%

Here:	3.4%
State average from 3582 schools:	4.5%

Asian Enrollment (%): 1.1%

Isd/Local Center Programs School:	1.1%
State average from 3582 schools:	1.9%

American Indian Enrollment (%): 2.3%

Here:	2.3%
State average from 3582 schools:	1.2%

2003 Student Enrollment: 74

Female Enrollment : 29
Male Enrollment : 45

Kindergarten Enrollment : 7
1st Grade Enrollment : 2
2nd Grade Enrollment : 2
3rd Grade Enrollment : 10
4th Grade Enrollment : 2
5th Grade Enrollment : 2
6th Grade Enrollment : 10
7th Grade Enrollment : 5
8th Grade Enrollment : 9
9th Grade Enrollment : 7
10th Grade Enrollment : 5
11th Grade Enrollment : 5
12th Grade Enrollment : 8

Kindergarten Female Enrollment : 2
1st Grade Female Enrollment : 1
3rd Grade Enrollment : 3
5th Grade Female Enrollment : 1
6th Grade Female Enrollment : 4
7th Grade Female Enrollment : 1
8th Grade Female Enrollment : 4
9th Grade Female Enrollment : 4
10th Grade Female Enrollment : 2
11th Grade Female Enrollment : 5
12th Grade Female Enrollment : 2

Kindergarten Male Enrollment : 5
1st Grade Male Enrollment : 1
2nd Grade Female Male Enrollment : 2
3rd Grade Female Male Enrollment : 7
4th Grade Female Male Enrollment : 2
5th Grade Female Male Enrollment : 1
6th Grade Male Enrollment : 6
7th Grade Male Enrollment : 4
8th Grade Male Enrollment : 5
9th Grade Male Enrollment : 3
10th Grade Male Enrollment : 3
12th Grade Male Enrollment : 6

White Enrollment (%): 90.5%

Here:	90.5%
State average from 3497 schools:	73.5%

Black Enrollment (%): 4.0%

Here:	4.0%
State average from 3497 schools:	18.7%

Hispanic Enrollment (%): 2.7%

Here:	2.7%
State average from 3497 schools:	4.3%

American Indian Enrollment (%): 2.7%

Isd/Local Center Programs School:	2.7%
State average from 3497 schools:	1.3%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Statistics:

Met Overall AYP : Yes

School Safety Practices:

Warning codes used to alert faculty of a critical incident : Yes
Tactical evacuation route for students or entry routes for emergency support teams : Yes
Off-site staging area for assembly and communication at the onset of critical incident : Yes
Emergency communication tree or plan : No
Facility blueprints and site plan on file with emergency support team : No
Control access to site during school hours (doors locked or monitored) : Yes
Control access to grounds during school hours (gates locked or monitored) : Yes
Students required to pass through metal detectors each day : No
Visitors required to pass through metal detectors : No
Campus closed for most students during lunch : Yes
Integrated home-land security in school practices into school safety plans : No
Random sweeps for weapons : No
Require clear book bags or ban book bags : No
Require students to wear badges or picture IDs : No
Require staff to wear badges or picture IDs : No
Provide staff training in risk assessment : Yes
Security cameras used to monitor the school : No
Telephones provided in most classrooms : Yes
Emergency button provided in lavatories : No
In compliance with the state law that requires that a student who brings a firearm to school be expelled for one year : Yes
In compliance with Elem. and Sec. Edu. Act (ESEA), that requires referral to juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm to school : Yes
School wide training in positive behavioral support and interventions : Yes

School Safety Plans:

Safety plan exists - Shootings : No
Safety plan exists - Riots : No
Safety plan exists - Bomb scares or comparable threats (excluding fire) : Yes
Safety plan exists - Disaster planning (tornadoes, floods, chemical spill, etc.) : Yes
Safety plan exists - Hostages : Yes
Safety plan exists - Lock down : Yes

School Prevention Programs:

Implemented a violence prevention curriculum : No
Practiced behavior modification/intervention with students : Yes
Provided group counseling (social work) or therapeutic activity for students : Yes
Provided peer mentoring or coaching program : Yes
Provided peer mediation (student court) in resolving conduct problems : Yes
Provided conflict resolution training to staff and students : Yes
Provided programs that promote a sense of social integration among students : Yes
Established a hot line for students to report problems : No
Provided training and assistance in classroom management to teachers : Yes
Revised or reviewed school wide discipline policy : Yes
Made architectural or environmental modifications to reduce crime or violence : No
Used a paid law enforcement or security service : No
Implemented a drug prevention service : No
Conducted community service projects on prevention : No
Implemented teacher/staff training on violence/drug prevention : No
Conducted public/parent awareness activities on violence/drug prevention : No
Offered after-school or before-school programs : No
Provided alternative education programs : No
Underwent curriculum acquisition or development : Yes
Provided services for out-of-school youth (school-age) : Yes
Administered special one-time events (not included in the above mentioned programs) : No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence-prevention services via joint service delivery (including referrals) : No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via teacher/staff training : No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via public awareness activities : No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via fund raising : No
Allowed students to participate in the design, delivery or critiquing of a drug or violence prevention program : No
Balanced and restorative justice conferencing (aka transformative conferencing) : No

Attendance Statistics:

Attendance Rate (2005): 97.0%

Here:	97.0%
State average from 3919 schools:	92.3%

Attendance Rate (2004): 87.0%

Here:	87.0%
State average from 3863 schools:	92.4%

Back to: Stanton, MI, Michigan, Michigan forum, All US cities.