All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Enterprise, NV
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School in Enterprise, Nevada (NV)
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School in Enterprise, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
54 .
Address:
Principal: Arthur C. Adams, Jr.
Phone Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-2290
Fax Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-5717
Website: schools.ccsd.net
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: In Need of Improvement (Year 2)
Special Programs: Full-Day Kindergarten: No
Other nearby schools ratings:
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Clark County:
41Enterprise:
57Jack Lund Schofield Middle School:
54
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: In Need of Improvement (Year 2)
Participation Black:
100.0%Pacific Islander:
100.0%White:
99.8%Hispanic:
99.8%All Students:
99.7%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
99.7%Individual Education Plan Students:
99.6%Limited English Proficiency Students:
99.5%Asian:
99.5%Two or more Races:
98.3%
Percent Proficient Pacific Islander:
82.3%Two or more Races:
80.0%Asian:
79.1%White:
76.5%All Students:
70.3%Hispanic:
63.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
61.9%Limited English Proficiency Students:
49.0%Black:
42.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
31.8%
Math School Math AYP Designation: In Need of Improvement (Year 2)
Participation All Students:
100.0%Asian:
100.0%Hispanic:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Pacific Islander:
100.0%Two or more Races:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient Two or more Races:
63.8%White:
62.4%Asian:
57.7%Pacific Islander:
57.4%All Students:
56.0%Hispanic:
49.7%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
44.4%Black:
35.2%Limited English Proficiency Students:
22.4%Individual Education Plan Students:
21.3%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
Asian:
97.2%Two or more Races:
95.3%All Students:
95.1%Hispanic:
95.0%White:
95.0%Pacific Islander:
94.9%Limited English Proficiency Students:
94.9%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
94.0%Black:
93.7%Individual Education Plan Students:
93.5%American Indian:
93.2%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 8
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
34.6%Nevada:
36.5%
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 405 -1.9% -3.0% 3.5% 2.7% 34.6% 36.5% 61.4% 59.1% 0.5% 1.7%
Male 221 -10.8% -12.8% 5.5% 4.0% 41.6% 45.0% 52.5% 50.2% 0.5% 0.8%
Female 184 8.9% 7.1% 1.1% 1.4% 26.2% 27.8% 72.1% 68.3% 0.6% 2.6%
Asian 19 14.0% 14.4% 0.0% 1.0% 22.2% 20.9% 72.2% 73.8% 5.6% 4.4%
Pacific Islander 10 -3.8% -3.9% 0.0% 1.9% 40.0% 38.2% 60.0% 58.3% 0.0% 1.6%
Hispanic 120 -7.1% -15.7% 3.3% 3.9% 40.0% 48.0% 56.7% 47.6% 0.0% 0.6%
Black 31 -34.8% -16.3% 12.9% 4.4% 58.1% 48.0% 29.0% 46.9% 0.0% 0.7%
White 199 4.4% 7.3% 3.0% 1.6% 28.8% 27.3% 67.7% 68.6% 0.5% 2.5%
Two or more Races 25 7.0% 8.6% 0.0% 1.7% 29.2% 25.9% 70.8% 70.3% 0.0% 2.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 37 -44.9% -49.0% 13.5% 17.8% 67.6% 67.4% 18.9% 14.7% 0.0% 0.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 29 -35.2% -42.0% 17.9% 8.7% 53.6% 69.5% 28.6% 21.7% 0.0% 0.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 128 -16.1% -15.2% 8.6% 4.2% 43.8% 47.3% 47.7% 48.0% 0.0% 0.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 518 -6.0% -6.9% 5.3% 5.1% 37.0% 38.0% 54.1% 48.1% 3.6% 8.8%
Male 262 -12.4% -15.7% 7.3% 7.5% 41.2% 44.4% 49.0% 42.3% 2.4% 5.8%
Female 256 0.2% 2.3% 3.2% 2.6% 32.8% 31.3% 59.2% 54.1% 4.8% 12.0%
American Indian 11 -18.3% -12.4% 18.2% 6.3% 36.4% 42.3% 36.4% 46.1% 9.1% 5.3%
Asian 60 -2.8% 8.3% 5.1% 2.6% 33.9% 25.3% 55.9% 53.3% 5.1% 18.8%
Hispanic 135 -15.7% -18.5% 3.9% 6.9% 48.1% 47.8% 46.5% 41.4% 1.6% 3.9%
Black 60 -17.4% -18.5% 5.4% 8.0% 48.2% 46.7% 42.9% 39.5% 3.6% 5.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 54 -41.1% -49.0% 22.7% 25.5% 54.5% 59.7% 22.7% 14.1% 0.0% 0.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 15 -50.5% -51.3% 13.3% 20.7% 73.3% 66.8% 13.3% 12.4% 0.0% 0.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 143 -15.3% -18.2% 6.7% 7.5% 44.8% 46.9% 47.0% 41.3% 1.5% 4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 464 -0.4% -1.3% 5.2% 5.7% 37.2% 37.7% 52.4% 47.3% 5.2% 9.4%
Male 252 -8.6% -9.6% 7.6% 8.0% 43.0% 43.7% 45.4% 42.1% 4.0% 6.2%
Female 212 9.5% 7.1% 2.4% 3.3% 30.1% 31.6% 60.8% 52.6% 6.7% 12.6%
Asian 53 9.9% 13.7% 0.0% 2.5% 32.1% 25.8% 56.6% 54.2% 11.3% 17.4%
Hispanic 112 -7.1% -13.7% 4.5% 8.6% 44.6% 47.1% 47.3% 39.9% 3.6% 4.4%
Black 41 -14.1% -11.8% 22.0% 8.7% 34.1% 45.1% 41.5% 41.0% 2.4% 5.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 54 -36.8% -42.8% 19.2% 26.3% 59.6% 58.6% 21.2% 14.5% 0.0% 0.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 -28.0% -44.7% 0.0% 24.6% 70.0% 62.1% 25.0% 12.9% 5.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 106 -11.3% -14.0% 8.6% 8.9% 44.8% 47.1% 45.7% 39.8% 1.0% 4.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 507 4.8% -2.1% 5.1% 6.2% 32.0% 37.8% 53.4% 46.1% 9.5% 9.8%
Male 281 -3.4% -10.7% 7.1% 8.8% 38.2% 44.0% 49.6% 40.8% 5.0% 6.5%
Female 226 15.0% 7.3% 2.7% 3.5% 24.3% 31.2% 58.0% 52.0% 15.0% 13.3%
Asian 42 18.2% 11.5% 0.0% 3.5% 23.8% 27.1% 54.8% 51.2% 21.4% 18.3%
Hispanic 141 1.6% -15.4% 5.0% 9.9% 35.5% 47.4% 53.9% 38.2% 5.7% 4.4%
Black 37 -9.4% -11.9% 13.5% 8.1% 37.8% 45.9% 40.5% 40.6% 8.1% 5.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 47 -32.5% -40.7% 31.9% 26.1% 42.6% 56.6% 25.5% 16.5% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 14 -29.4% -44.5% 14.3% 25.8% 57.1% 60.7% 28.6% 13.1% 0.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 92 -10.2% -15.3% 7.6% 9.6% 44.6% 47.7% 44.6% 38.3% 3.3% 4.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 474 22.6% 19.1% 7.1% 6.8% 30.8% 34.5% 50.6% 46.6% 11.5% 12.1%
Male 241 12.5% 11.1% 12.1% 9.2% 35.8% 40.1% 47.5% 42.2% 4.6% 8.6%
Female 233 33.2% 27.6% 1.8% 4.2% 25.4% 28.7% 53.9% 51.3% 18.9% 15.9%
Asian 45 31.8% 30.5% 7.1% 3.6% 21.4% 26.3% 54.8% 50.8% 16.7% 19.4%
Hispanic 106 12.8% 4.7% 9.5% 10.8% 38.1% 45.0% 44.8% 38.8% 7.6% 5.4%
Black 41 4.3% 6.9% 12.2% 10.0% 43.9% 43.5% 29.3% 40.0% 14.6% 6.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 52 -23.6% -21.4% 36.0% 27.4% 48.0% 54.5% 16.0% 17.2% 0.0% 1.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 34 -0.2% -24.8% 21.2% 28.6% 39.4% 56.6% 30.3% 13.9% 9.1% 0.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 82 11.6% 5.3% 11.0% 10.7% 37.8% 44.4% 40.2% 39.4% 11.0% 5.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 509 23.4% 15.7% 1.8% 5.7% 27.3% 31.1% 55.9% 47.9% 15.0% 15.3%
Male 267 15.3% 8.0% 3.1% 7.9% 34.1% 36.6% 51.6% 44.6% 11.2% 10.9%
Female 242 32.2% 23.8% 0.4% 3.4% 19.9% 25.3% 60.6% 51.4% 19.1% 19.9%
Asian 50 30.1% 28.0% 0.0% 2.4% 22.4% 22.1% 63.3% 50.7% 14.3% 24.7%
Hispanic 100 15.8% 2.2% 3.1% 10.0% 33.7% 40.4% 56.1% 42.4% 7.1% 7.3%
Black 50 10.8% 3.9% 0.0% 8.4% 41.7% 40.2% 47.9% 42.7% 10.4% 8.7%
White 303 27.0% 26.3% 2.0% 2.6% 23.5% 23.7% 56.5% 52.7% 18.0% 21.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 41 -34.3% -26.3% 13.2% 24.5% 73.7% 54.3% 13.2% 19.6% 0.0% 1.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 -7.5% -23.5% 13.3% 23.9% 46.7% 52.1% 40.0% 21.5% 0.0% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 60 15.0% 2.1% 5.4% 9.6% 32.1% 40.9% 50.0% 42.0% 12.5% 7.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 555 26.2% 18.3% 4.7% 6.1% 21.6% 28.1% 51.4% 48.0% 22.3% 17.7%
Male 275 17.9% 10.3% 5.9% 7.9% 28.7% 34.3% 48.9% 45.3% 16.5% 12.5%
Female 279 34.5% 26.9% 3.6% 4.2% 14.4% 21.5% 54.0% 50.9% 28.1% 23.5%
Asian 54 24.7% 29.0% 5.6% 3.3% 22.2% 20.2% 40.7% 51.7% 31.5% 24.8%
Hispanic 99 14.1% 3.4% 10.1% 10.9% 28.3% 38.2% 47.5% 42.3% 14.1% 8.6%
Black 48 14.2% 4.0% 4.3% 9.1% 34.0% 39.5% 42.6% 41.2% 19.1% 10.3%
White 351 31.2% 29.2% 3.2% 2.9% 18.1% 20.4% 55.5% 52.5% 23.3% 24.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 53 -17.5% -22.9% 20.0% 24.8% 50.0% 50.7% 20.0% 22.4% 10.0% 2.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 18 -14.2% -20.2% 27.8% 21.8% 38.9% 50.9% 33.3% 25.4% 0.0% 1.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 59 13.9% 5.6% 8.8% 9.4% 29.8% 37.6% 47.4% 44.2% 14.0% 8.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 539 41.3% 27.7% 5.8% 9.8% 16.0% 25.5% 51.6% 45.9% 26.7% 18.9%
Male 284 40.1% 20.1% 4.2% 12.5% 18.7% 30.5% 55.6% 43.3% 21.5% 13.8%
Female 254 42.5% 36.0% 7.5% 7.0% 13.0% 20.1% 46.9% 48.7% 32.7% 24.3%
Asian 54 44.5% 38.6% 3.7% 5.3% 14.8% 19.2% 51.9% 46.7% 29.6% 28.9%
Hispanic 93 29.7% 13.4% 5.4% 14.4% 28.0% 35.2% 50.5% 41.4% 16.1% 9.0%
Black 30 19.7% 14.1% 10.0% 14.8% 33.3% 34.0% 40.0% 40.5% 16.7% 10.6%
White 357 46.2% 37.6% 5.9% 6.6% 10.9% 18.8% 52.9% 49.5% 30.3% 25.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 38 -5.4% -13.2% 26.3% 29.6% 42.1% 46.6% 31.6% 21.8% 0.0% 2.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 47 20.4% 6.4% 8.5% 16.9% 34.0% 39.7% 42.6% 36.5% 14.9% 6.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 69 23.9% 13.9% 13.0% 13.9% 26.1% 35.2% 50.7% 41.9% 10.1% 9.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 6 Students Tested: 420
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
9.1%Nevada:
10.0%
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 420 5.5% 4.5% 9.1% 10.0% 19.5% 19.6% 68.1% 64.7% 3.3% 5.7%
Male 226 0.9% 3.1% 10.2% 11.4% 23.0% 19.6% 63.7% 63.2% 3.1% 5.8%
Female 194 10.9% 5.9% 7.7% 8.6% 15.5% 19.6% 73.2% 66.2% 3.6% 5.6%
Asian 33 18.9% 20.5% 6.1% 3.7% 9.1% 9.8% 78.8% 71.9% 6.1% 14.6%
Pacific Islander 16 15.4% 6.4% 12.5% 6.7% 6.3% 21.0% 81.3% 69.2% 0.0% 3.1%
Hispanic 123 1.6% -2.5% 11.4% 12.6% 21.1% 23.9% 65.9% 61.2% 1.6% 2.2%
Black 34 -13.0% -17.3% 17.7% 20.7% 29.4% 30.7% 50.0% 47.2% 2.9% 1.3%
White 181 7.6% 14.3% 6.6% 5.8% 19.9% 14.0% 68.5% 71.3% 5.0% 8.9%
Two or more Races 31 14.8% 11.2% 6.5% 8.1% 12.9% 14.8% 80.7% 69.5% 0.0% 7.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 48 -43.0% -22.4% 35.4% 27.6% 41.7% 28.9% 22.9% 42.0% 0.0% 1.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 41 -9.8% -15.1% 22.0% 18.7% 22.0% 30.6% 56.1% 49.7% 0.0% 1.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 166 1.0% -4.7% 12.1% 14.2% 21.1% 24.6% 65.7% 58.6% 1.2% 2.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 438 0.3% -1.9% 7.3% 11.9% 26.5% 24.0% 63.9% 58.5% 2.3% 5.5%
Male 230 1.5% -3.0% 6.1% 13.4% 26.5% 23.7% 64.8% 57.1% 2.6% 5.8%
Female 208 -1.0% -0.8% 8.7% 10.4% 26.4% 24.4% 63.0% 60.0% 1.9% 5.1%
Asian 54 6.3% 13.0% 9.3% 5.6% 18.5% 15.5% 68.5% 67.0% 3.7% 11.9%
Hispanic 135 -2.9% -11.6% 8.9% 14.9% 28.1% 30.9% 60.7% 52.0% 2.2% 2.2%
Black 36 -32.6% -21.9% 16.7% 24.0% 50.0% 32.0% 33.3% 42.3% 0.0% 1.7%
White 212 6.3% 10.0% 4.2% 7.0% 23.6% 17.1% 69.8% 67.5% 2.4% 8.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 32 -40.9% -21.4% 34.4% 24.4% 40.6% 31.1% 25.0% 41.8% 0.0% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -25.9% -38.9% 15.0% 30.5% 45.0% 42.5% 35.0% 26.7% 5.0% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 152 -10.0% -13.5% 9.2% 16.8% 34.9% 30.8% 55.3% 50.3% 0.7% 2.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 446 12.5% 12.3% 10.0% 8.9% 22.9% 24.2% 46.5% 42.2% 20.6% 24.7%
Male 228 11.0% 10.9% 11.6% 10.3% 22.8% 24.1% 41.1% 40.3% 24.6% 25.3%
Female 218 14.0% 13.7% 8.3% 7.4% 23.0% 24.3% 52.1% 44.2% 16.6% 24.1%
Asian 47 21.9% 27.1% 4.3% 3.7% 19.1% 14.5% 53.2% 41.6% 23.4% 40.3%
Hispanic 128 2.4% 2.7% 14.1% 11.5% 28.9% 31.1% 44.5% 42.6% 12.5% 14.7%
Black 39 -2.0% -5.9% 26.3% 17.9% 21.1% 33.3% 34.2% 37.8% 18.4% 11.0%
White 228 18.5% 23.0% 6.3% 5.0% 20.5% 17.3% 48.2% 43.0% 25.0% 34.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 47 -31.9% -28.4% 50.0% 36.9% 27.3% 36.8% 18.2% 21.5% 4.5% 4.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -23.9% -21.2% 19.2% 22.5% 50.0% 44.0% 26.9% 30.0% 3.8% 3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 104 -2.7% 2.2% 13.5% 12.7% 34.6% 30.5% 37.5% 42.1% 14.4% 14.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 484 12.8% 7.6% 11.6% 12.5% 21.0% 25.2% 41.1% 39.5% 26.3% 22.8%
Male 242 12.8% 5.7% 15.8% 14.4% 16.7% 25.1% 42.1% 37.7% 25.4% 22.7%
Female 242 12.7% 9.6% 7.4% 10.4% 25.2% 25.3% 40.1% 41.4% 27.3% 22.9%
American Indian 11 -27.4% 2.3% 36.4% 11.8% 36.4% 31.2% 9.1% 43.1% 18.2% 13.9%
Asian 57 29.5% 22.4% 3.5% 5.5% 12.3% 17.4% 52.6% 41.3% 31.6% 35.7%
Hispanic 121 5.8% -3.1% 15.1% 16.4% 24.4% 32.1% 41.2% 38.3% 19.3% 13.2%
Black 55 -9.2% -11.4% 25.5% 25.2% 29.1% 31.6% 32.7% 31.8% 12.7% 11.4%
White 240 19.1% 19.4% 7.5% 7.1% 18.8% 18.9% 41.7% 42.0% 32.1% 32.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 37 -38.0% -33.2% 38.9% 44.1% 44.4% 34.5% 8.3% 17.5% 8.3% 4.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -29.7% -28.7% 45.0% 31.9% 30.0% 42.1% 20.0% 23.4% 5.0% 2.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 104 -4.2% -4.5% 17.5% 17.8% 32.0% 32.1% 32.0% 37.4% 18.4% 12.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 481 24.2% 16.6% 12.3% 14.4% 20.2% 25.7% 44.6% 40.7% 22.9% 19.2%
Male 260 19.4% 14.8% 14.6% 16.7% 22.7% 25.2% 42.3% 38.5% 20.4% 19.6%
Female 221 29.9% 18.5% 9.5% 12.0% 17.3% 26.3% 47.3% 43.0% 25.9% 18.8%
Asian 59 33.0% 31.7% 6.8% 6.8% 16.9% 18.2% 32.2% 43.6% 44.1% 31.4%
Hispanic 112 21.0% 4.2% 16.1% 19.5% 19.6% 32.9% 52.7% 37.4% 11.6% 10.2%
Black 41 3.0% -3.1% 22.0% 26.7% 31.7% 33.1% 39.0% 32.2% 7.3% 8.0%
White 261 27.5% 29.4% 10.0% 8.4% 19.2% 18.9% 45.0% 45.2% 25.8% 27.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 60 -16.6% -24.1% 45.0% 48.0% 28.3% 32.9% 20.0% 15.8% 6.7% 3.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -12.5% -22.2% 26.9% 37.5% 42.3% 41.5% 15.4% 19.1% 15.4% 2.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 75 16.7% 3.8% 14.7% 20.5% 25.3% 32.4% 45.3% 37.0% 14.7% 10.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 7 Students Tested: 454
This School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
6.8%Nevada:
11.4%
Approaches Standard This School:
19.4%Nevada:
18.2%
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 454 7.9% 4.5% 6.8% 11.4% 19.4% 18.2% 67.6% 62.7% 6.2% 7.7%
Male 227 9.4% 3.1% 6.6% 12.5% 18.1% 18.6% 67.8% 61.0% 7.5% 8.0%
Female 227 6.4% 6.1% 7.1% 10.2% 20.7% 17.8% 67.4% 64.5% 4.9% 7.5%
Asian 38 7.8% 20.0% 7.9% 4.9% 18.4% 9.1% 65.8% 67.0% 7.9% 19.0%
Hispanic 148 0.3% -3.6% 7.4% 14.8% 26.4% 22.9% 61.5% 58.9% 4.7% 3.5%
Black 31 -20.7% -14.8% 12.9% 22.8% 41.9% 26.1% 45.2% 49.0% 0.0% 2.1%
White 191 18.4% 15.0% 4.7% 6.3% 11.0% 12.9% 76.4% 69.2% 7.9% 11.7%
Two or more Races 34 4.7% 10.2% 8.8% 7.5% 20.6% 16.4% 64.7% 65.8% 5.9% 10.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 24 -36.7% -29.6% 41.7% 38.3% 29.2% 25.4% 29.2% 33.8% 0.0% 2.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 34 -21.8% -23.3% 14.7% 26.3% 41.2% 31.2% 41.2% 41.8% 2.9% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 188 -1.0% -4.8% 10.6% 15.9% 24.5% 23.0% 61.7% 57.6% 3.2% 3.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 433 4.3% -0.6% 9.8% 12.2% 20.0% 22.5% 66.7% 59.0% 3.5% 6.3%
Male 234 3.9% -0.9% 12.5% 13.1% 17.7% 22.0% 66.4% 58.3% 3.4% 6.7%
Female 199 4.8% -0.2% 6.6% 11.3% 22.7% 23.0% 67.2% 59.8% 3.5% 5.9%
Asian 52 8.6% 14.1% 7.8% 4.9% 17.6% 15.0% 68.6% 66.0% 5.9% 14.1%
Hispanic 122 -3.6% -11.9% 9.8% 16.9% 27.9% 29.1% 62.3% 51.6% 0.0% 2.4%
Black 44 -15.9% -17.6% 25.0% 22.0% 25.0% 29.6% 45.5% 46.0% 4.5% 2.3%
White 212 12.7% 11.3% 6.2% 6.7% 15.2% 16.1% 73.8% 67.8% 4.8% 9.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 42 -46.9% -26.2% 50.0% 32.3% 31.0% 28.0% 19.0% 37.2% 0.0% 2.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -34.1% -42.6% 40.9% 38.0% 27.3% 38.8% 31.8% 22.9% 0.0% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 135 -7.7% -12.1% 17.2% 17.8% 24.6% 28.5% 56.7% 51.1% 1.5% 2.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 498 7.2% 8.7% 11.9% 11.6% 26.2% 25.1% 42.3% 39.5% 19.6% 23.8%
Male 246 8.9% 6.4% 11.5% 13.6% 25.0% 25.3% 44.7% 37.7% 18.9% 23.4%
Female 252 5.6% 11.0% 12.3% 9.5% 27.4% 24.9% 40.1% 41.5% 20.2% 24.2%
American Indian 10 -4.7% 1.4% 40.0% 13.8% 10.0% 30.1% 30.0% 40.7% 20.0% 15.3%
Asian 66 25.3% 23.9% 6.2% 5.3% 13.8% 16.1% 53.8% 38.4% 26.2% 40.1%
Hispanic 126 0.9% -1.7% 14.3% 15.4% 30.2% 31.6% 40.5% 39.0% 15.1% 13.9%
Black 58 -20.2% -9.1% 20.7% 22.0% 44.8% 32.4% 29.3% 33.8% 5.2% 11.8%
White 238 12.8% 19.7% 8.9% 6.6% 23.6% 19.1% 43.9% 41.6% 23.6% 32.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 48 -44.0% -33.5% 46.8% 43.6% 42.6% 35.3% 8.5% 17.9% 2.1% 3.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -28.4% -30.1% 47.4% 33.0% 26.3% 42.4% 26.3% 21.3% 0.0% 3.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 118 -4.7% -2.4% 16.1% 16.2% 33.9% 31.5% 40.7% 38.3% 9.3% 14.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 481 6.9% 4.5% 11.1% 14.3% 27.3% 26.5% 35.1% 38.2% 26.5% 20.9%
Male 263 4.2% 2.1% 13.5% 16.7% 27.7% 26.6% 32.3% 36.0% 26.5% 20.7%
Female 218 10.1% 6.9% 8.3% 11.9% 26.9% 26.5% 38.4% 40.5% 26.4% 21.1%
Asian 75 15.6% 21.0% 8.1% 6.6% 21.6% 17.7% 36.5% 40.3% 33.8% 35.4%
Hispanic 105 -8.1% -7.7% 14.6% 19.7% 38.8% 33.4% 31.1% 35.5% 15.5% 11.5%
Black 44 -16.0% -13.0% 22.7% 24.4% 38.6% 33.9% 29.5% 32.3% 9.1% 9.4%
White 250 15.1% 16.3% 8.5% 8.7% 21.8% 20.3% 37.5% 41.7% 32.3% 29.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 57 -33.6% -37.4% 43.9% 48.3% 35.1% 34.4% 14.0% 14.4% 7.0% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 25 -22.7% -33.7% 36.0% 38.0% 32.0% 41.0% 20.0% 18.2% 12.0% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 105 0.2% -8.5% 15.7% 20.3% 29.4% 33.5% 38.2% 34.9% 16.7% 11.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 522 23.8% 14.8% 10.7% 15.2% 22.2% 26.7% 42.3% 39.2% 24.8% 18.9%
Male 298 17.9% 12.1% 13.7% 18.1% 25.1% 26.5% 37.1% 36.1% 24.1% 19.3%
Female 224 31.5% 17.6% 6.8% 12.2% 18.5% 26.8% 49.1% 42.5% 25.7% 18.5%
Asian 43 35.8% 33.4% 7.0% 7.0% 14.0% 16.3% 30.2% 44.2% 48.8% 32.5%
Hispanic 140 17.1% 1.4% 6.5% 21.2% 33.1% 34.0% 44.6% 35.5% 15.8% 9.2%
Black 36 5.2% -2.4% 30.3% 25.5% 21.2% 33.7% 42.4% 32.9% 6.1% 8.0%
White 299 27.4% 27.2% 11.2% 9.0% 18.0% 20.5% 42.9% 42.9% 27.9% 27.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 52 -21.7% -26.4% 58.8% 50.4% 19.6% 32.7% 19.6% 14.7% 2.0% 2.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 18 -15.5% -23.0% 33.3% 40.0% 38.9% 39.7% 22.2% 18.1% 5.6% 2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 89 9.6% 1.5% 19.5% 21.2% 27.6% 34.0% 43.7% 35.8% 9.2% 9.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 8 Students Tested: 438
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School:
100.0%State:
99.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
56.6%State:
55.0%
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 438 -7.2% -6.7% 8.9% 8.8% 32.4% 32.0% 56.6% 55.0% 2.1% 4.2%
Male 240 -8.4% -8.8% 11.3% 10.3% 31.3% 32.6% 55.0% 52.9% 2.5% 4.3%
Female 198 -5.8% -4.6% 6.1% 7.2% 33.8% 31.4% 58.6% 57.2% 1.5% 4.2%
Asian 25 14.1% 15.3% 4.0% 3.1% 16.0% 15.7% 72.0% 67.7% 8.0% 13.6%
Pacific Islander 12 9.1% -6.3% 8.3% 8.3% 16.7% 32.1% 75.0% 56.1% 0.0% 3.5%
Hispanic 127 -17.9% -16.6% 10.2% 11.3% 41.7% 39.4% 47.2% 47.6% 0.8% 1.7%
Black 37 -36.2% -25.0% 21.6% 16.6% 48.7% 42.5% 29.7% 39.7% 0.0% 1.2%
White 210 -0.7% 3.4% 6.2% 5.5% 28.6% 25.2% 62.9% 63.5% 2.4% 5.9%
Two or more Races 26 7.2% 1.8% 7.7% 6.4% 19.2% 25.9% 69.2% 62.0% 3.9% 5.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 39 -55.6% -39.2% 38.5% 28.4% 51.3% 45.0% 10.3% 25.6% 0.0% 1.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 30 -29.2% -39.2% 23.3% 21.4% 40.0% 51.9% 36.7% 26.0% 0.0% 0.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 145 -22.4% -16.9% 13.1% 12.1% 43.5% 39.0% 42.8% 47.0% 0.7% 2.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 502 -4.1% -10.0% 9.4% 13.5% 28.9% 30.6% 59.8% 52.2% 2.0% 3.7%
Male 248 -1.4% -10.5% 8.1% 14.2% 27.4% 30.4% 62.9% 51.6% 1.6% 3.8%
Female 254 -6.8% -9.5% 10.6% 12.8% 30.3% 30.8% 56.7% 52.8% 2.4% 3.6%
American Indian 11 -20.4% -17.9% 27.3% 16.6% 27.3% 35.4% 45.5% 46.6% 0.0% 1.4%
Asian 60 15.8% 9.6% 1.7% 5.4% 16.7% 19.1% 80.0% 65.7% 1.7% 9.8%
Hispanic 133 -18.5% -21.7% 10.5% 18.3% 42.1% 37.5% 46.6% 42.9% 0.8% 1.3%
Black 58 -17.6% -25.9% 20.7% 22.4% 31.0% 37.6% 48.3% 38.9% 0.0% 1.2%
White 240 2.8% 0.6% 7.1% 8.6% 24.2% 25.0% 65.4% 61.1% 3.3% 5.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 46 -55.0% -37.4% 32.6% 32.5% 56.5% 39.0% 10.9% 27.9% 0.0% 0.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 -40.9% -50.0% 25.0% 39.0% 50.0% 45.1% 25.0% 15.3% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 147 -13.5% -22.1% 14.3% 19.4% 33.3% 36.8% 51.0% 42.3% 1.4% 1.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 472 5.2% 0.0% 9.8% 13.0% 30.4% 32.3% 46.1% 41.1% 13.8% 13.6%
Male 255 4.4% 0.1% 11.0% 14.0% 29.9% 31.2% 44.1% 40.3% 15.0% 14.5%
Female 217 6.2% -0.1% 8.3% 12.1% 30.9% 33.4% 48.4% 41.8% 12.4% 12.7%
Asian 54 19.4% 17.2% 5.6% 5.7% 20.4% 22.5% 44.4% 45.4% 29.6% 26.5%
Hispanic 114 -7.3% -13.1% 13.2% 18.8% 39.5% 39.7% 44.7% 35.3% 2.6% 6.2%
Black 44 -16.0% -18.5% 20.5% 23.5% 40.9% 40.3% 36.4% 30.7% 2.3% 5.4%
White 255 11.5% 12.4% 7.1% 7.1% 26.8% 25.9% 48.4% 47.6% 17.7% 19.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 56 -33.2% -39.8% 42.9% 45.9% 35.7% 39.2% 16.1% 13.6% 5.4% 1.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -31.9% -39.9% 27.3% 42.2% 50.0% 43.0% 18.2% 13.1% 4.5% 1.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 108 -2.8% -12.8% 14.8% 18.7% 33.3% 39.4% 49.1% 35.3% 2.8% 6.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 506 4.8% -2.3% 12.8% 17.0% 27.7% 30.7% 45.5% 41.9% 14.0% 10.4%
Male 278 -0.5% -3.4% 15.6% 18.3% 30.2% 30.4% 40.4% 40.3% 13.8% 11.0%
Female 228 11.3% -1.2% 9.3% 15.5% 24.8% 31.1% 51.8% 43.6% 14.2% 9.8%
Asian 50 19.3% 15.4% 8.0% 8.3% 18.0% 21.6% 52.0% 48.6% 22.0% 21.5%
Hispanic 142 -1.8% -16.2% 14.3% 24.2% 32.9% 37.3% 47.9% 34.5% 5.0% 4.0%
Black 36 -18.6% -20.5% 33.3% 28.3% 30.6% 37.5% 30.6% 30.9% 5.6% 3.3%
White 275 8.9% 11.1% 9.9% 9.4% 26.5% 24.8% 45.2% 49.8% 18.4% 15.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 45 -34.2% -41.6% 54.5% 53.5% 25.0% 33.4% 18.2% 12.2% 2.3% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 12 -36.5% -40.9% 45.5% 47.5% 36.4% 38.7% 18.2% 13.1% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 88 -11.0% -15.8% 21.8% 24.2% 34.5% 36.9% 37.9% 34.9% 5.7% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 480 13.7% 9.5% 15.5% 19.0% 27.5% 28.2% 44.9% 43.1% 12.1% 9.7%
Male 248 12.2% 8.9% 19.6% 20.6% 24.9% 27.2% 43.3% 41.8% 12.2% 10.4%
Female 232 15.3% 10.1% 11.0% 17.3% 30.4% 29.3% 46.7% 44.5% 11.9% 8.9%
Asian 41 25.0% 27.5% 12.2% 10.3% 19.5% 18.9% 56.1% 50.6% 12.2% 20.1%
Hispanic 107 10.0% -5.7% 21.0% 27.1% 25.7% 35.3% 44.8% 33.9% 8.6% 3.8%
Black 43 -2.8% -10.5% 35.7% 33.4% 23.8% 33.7% 33.3% 29.6% 7.1% 3.2%
White 286 16.5% 23.5% 10.7% 10.4% 29.5% 22.8% 45.6% 52.5% 14.2% 14.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 53 -33.5% -30.9% 64.7% 56.6% 25.5% 31.0% 9.8% 11.5% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 24 -14.1% -30.1% 50.0% 51.2% 20.8% 35.6% 25.0% 12.4% 4.2% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 80 8.0% -4.8% 23.1% 26.6% 25.6% 34.8% 46.2% 34.5% 5.1% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 501 23.0% 7.2% 6.9% 16.4% 26.9% 33.2% 47.9% 39.8% 18.4% 10.7%
Male 258 21.9% 6.0% 8.3% 18.6% 26.5% 32.1% 45.8% 38.0% 19.4% 11.3%
Female 243 24.1% 8.3% 5.4% 14.1% 27.3% 34.3% 50.0% 41.6% 17.4% 10.1%
Asian 45 34.5% 24.3% 2.2% 8.1% 20.0% 24.4% 48.9% 47.4% 28.9% 20.2%
Hispanic 101 13.3% -8.0% 13.1% 24.0% 30.3% 40.8% 46.5% 31.5% 10.1% 3.8%
Black 50 4.6% -11.0% 16.7% 27.8% 35.4% 39.9% 35.4% 28.2% 12.5% 4.1%
White 300 27.5% 20.0% 4.0% 9.5% 25.2% 27.2% 50.0% 47.4% 20.8% 15.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 47 -26.6% -32.3% 38.1% 52.2% 45.2% 36.9% 14.3% 10.3% 2.4% 0.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 6.7% -25.8% 25.0% 40.7% 25.0% 41.7% 31.3% 15.4% 18.8% 2.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 69 14.9% -8.4% 10.4% 24.3% 31.3% 40.8% 50.7% 30.9% 7.5% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 544 9.4% 5.7% 19.4% 19.6% 27.9% 31.4% 38.1% 38.1% 14.6% 10.9%
Male 269 4.6% 5.1% 23.2% 22.1% 28.8% 29.5% 33.7% 36.7% 14.2% 11.7%
Female 272 14.6% 6.7% 15.1% 16.5% 26.9% 33.5% 42.8% 39.8% 15.1% 10.1%
Asian 55 11.2% 20.3% 12.7% 11.6% 32.7% 24.8% 38.2% 44.6% 16.4% 19.1%
Hispanic 99 1.1% -9.6% 23.2% 28.8% 32.3% 37.6% 36.4% 29.4% 8.1% 4.3%
Black 51 -15.3% -15.2% 38.0% 33.6% 34.0% 38.3% 26.0% 24.9% 2.0% 3.2%
White 334 15.4% 18.2% 16.6% 11.6% 24.7% 26.9% 40.7% 45.7% 18.1% 15.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 58 -31.2% -31.9% 60.3% 60.0% 27.6% 28.6% 12.1% 10.3% 0.0% 1.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -22.2% -26.4% 47.4% 44.5% 31.6% 38.7% 21.1% 15.3% 0.0% 1.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 67 -11.5% -9.6% 34.8% 28.9% 33.3% 37.4% 27.3% 29.4% 4.5% 4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 534 36.5% 15.9% 10.1% 18.7% 21.3% 33.4% 50.4% 37.5% 18.2% 10.4%
Male 271 39.2% 15.0% 10.0% 21.4% 18.8% 31.5% 50.6% 35.7% 20.7% 11.3%
Female 248 36.1% 17.1% 7.7% 15.5% 24.2% 35.4% 51.6% 39.6% 16.5% 9.5%
Asian 54 38.4% 28.6% 9.3% 9.9% 20.4% 29.6% 44.4% 43.8% 25.9% 16.7%
Hispanic 85 24.5% -1.0% 8.2% 27.4% 35.3% 41.6% 47.1% 27.1% 9.4% 4.0%
Black 27 8.7% -5.2% 3.7% 32.3% 55.6% 40.9% 40.7% 23.6% 0.0% 3.2%
White 348 43.3% 28.6% 8.9% 11.6% 15.8% 27.7% 53.7% 45.7% 21.6% 14.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 38 -18.8% -22.9% 44.7% 58.4% 42.1% 32.5% 13.2% 8.3% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -0.2% -18.3% 27.3% 41.9% 40.9% 44.4% 22.7% 12.6% 9.1% 1.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 65 15.7% -0.4% 24.6% 27.4% 27.7% 41.0% 35.4% 27.6% 12.3% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 6 Students Tested: 420
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
26.9%State:
24.8%
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
Male
Here : -18.1%Nevada : -13.4%
Pacific Islander
This School : -9.6%State : -11.5%
Hispanic
Here : -13.9%State : -18.7%
Black
Here : -24.7%State : -28.1%
Two or more Races
This School : -20.7%Nevada : -0.1%
Individual Education Plan Students
This School : -53.4%State : -51.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : -39.1%Nevada : -35.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : -24.3%State : -20.0%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 420 -12.3% -8.6% 26.9% 24.8% 19.5% 17.9% 36.2% 35.3% 17.4% 22.0%
Male 226 -18.1% -13.4% 32.7% 29.3% 19.5% 18.3% 37.2% 33.2% 10.6% 19.3%
Female 194 -5.6% -3.5% 20.1% 20.1% 19.6% 17.5% 35.1% 37.6% 25.3% 24.9%
Asian 33 -17.4% 7.4% 33.3% 12.3% 18.2% 14.5% 30.3% 37.8% 18.2% 35.4%
Pacific Islander 16 -9.6% -11.5% 12.5% 24.1% 31.3% 21.5% 43.8% 38.4% 12.5% 16.0%
Hispanic 123 -13.9% -18.7% 29.3% 31.6% 18.7% 21.2% 39.8% 34.1% 12.2% 13.1%
Black 34 -24.7% -28.1% 44.1% 41.1% 14.7% 21.2% 32.4% 27.7% 8.8% 10.1%
White 181 -6.2% 3.9% 21.0% 15.9% 19.3% 14.3% 36.5% 37.7% 23.2% 32.1%
Two or more Races 31 -20.7% -0.1% 29.0% 18.9% 25.8% 15.4% 29.0% 37.2% 16.1% 28.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 48 -53.4% -51.1% 77.1% 71.7% 10.4% 13.5% 12.5% 12.0% 0.0% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 41 -39.1% -35.9% 48.8% 45.4% 24.4% 24.6% 19.5% 25.5% 7.3% 4.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 166 -24.3% -20.0% 33.1% 33.1% 25.3% 21.0% 33.7% 32.8% 7.8% 13.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 438 -0.8% -0.5% 6.2% 8.8% 28.8% 25.8% 45.4% 38.5% 19.6% 27.0%
Male 230 -2.4% -6.0% 7.0% 11.9% 29.6% 28.3% 46.5% 36.8% 17.0% 23.1%
Female 208 0.9% 5.4% 5.3% 5.6% 27.9% 23.1% 44.2% 40.2% 22.6% 31.0%
Asian 54 8.2% 11.4% 3.7% 3.9% 22.2% 18.8% 55.6% 38.4% 18.5% 38.9%
Hispanic 135 -6.6% -10.3% 6.7% 11.3% 34.1% 33.1% 44.4% 38.3% 14.8% 17.3%
Black 36 -24.2% -17.0% 13.9% 17.0% 44.4% 34.0% 27.8% 33.5% 13.9% 15.4%
White 212 4.9% 11.2% 5.2% 5.2% 24.1% 17.7% 46.7% 39.9% 24.1% 37.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 32 -47.1% -45.5% 40.6% 41.1% 40.6% 38.5% 18.8% 16.1% 0.0% 4.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -35.9% -44.6% 30.0% 26.7% 40.0% 52.0% 30.0% 19.7% 0.0% 1.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 152 -10.0% -11.8% 7.2% 12.8% 36.8% 33.1% 41.4% 37.8% 14.5% 16.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 446 5.5% 7.7% 14.0% 9.7% 25.8% 28.0% 43.4% 39.9% 16.7% 22.4%
Male 228 3.6% 2.8% 16.4% 12.4% 25.3% 30.1% 40.9% 37.7% 17.3% 19.8%
Female 218 7.5% 12.8% 11.5% 6.8% 26.3% 25.7% 46.1% 42.3% 16.1% 25.2%
Asian 47 15.5% 20.5% 4.3% 4.2% 25.5% 20.6% 51.1% 43.2% 19.1% 32.0%
Hispanic 128 -1.5% -4.8% 20.3% 13.2% 26.6% 37.0% 43.0% 37.5% 10.2% 12.4%
Black 39 -12.6% -6.9% 21.1% 16.2% 36.8% 36.0% 31.6% 35.5% 10.5% 12.2%
White 228 10.7% 20.4% 10.7% 5.8% 24.0% 19.1% 44.0% 42.6% 21.3% 32.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 47 -41.0% -37.1% 63.6% 41.9% 22.7% 40.5% 11.4% 14.1% 2.3% 3.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -50.8% -36.0% 53.8% 28.1% 42.3% 53.2% 3.8% 17.4% 0.0% 1.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 104 -10.4% -4.8% 20.2% 14.0% 35.6% 36.1% 36.5% 37.3% 7.7% 12.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 484 5.2% 5.2% 12.3% 12.5% 27.8% 27.6% 45.1% 41.1% 14.8% 18.8%
Male 242 2.7% -0.1% 16.0% 16.2% 26.6% 29.2% 46.4% 39.4% 11.0% 15.1%
Female 242 7.7% 10.8% 8.7% 8.7% 28.9% 25.9% 43.8% 42.8% 18.6% 22.7%
American Indian 11 -27.4% 2.4% 27.3% 12.6% 45.5% 30.4% 18.2% 41.3% 9.1% 15.7%
Asian 57 24.3% 17.7% 1.8% 6.7% 19.3% 20.9% 57.9% 45.4% 21.1% 27.0%
Hispanic 121 -1.7% -7.9% 16.8% 17.7% 30.3% 35.5% 46.2% 36.9% 6.7% 9.9%
Black 55 -14.7% -10.7% 29.1% 21.6% 30.9% 34.4% 36.4% 33.7% 3.6% 10.2%
White 240 10.3% 18.4% 8.0% 6.8% 27.0% 20.1% 44.7% 45.8% 20.3% 27.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 37 -35.2% -36.9% 41.7% 45.4% 38.9% 36.8% 16.7% 15.4% 2.8% 2.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -49.7% -38.6% 50.0% 37.2% 45.0% 46.7% 5.0% 15.3% 0.0% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 104 -10.0% -7.9% 26.2% 18.1% 29.1% 35.1% 37.9% 37.0% 6.8% 9.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 481 12.8% 13.6% 11.6% 11.9% 32.2% 31.2% 46.6% 44.0% 9.6% 12.9%
Male 260 5.9% 8.2% 14.6% 15.4% 36.2% 33.1% 41.2% 41.3% 8.1% 10.3%
Female 221 21.0% 19.2% 8.1% 8.3% 27.6% 29.2% 52.9% 46.9% 11.3% 15.5%
Asian 59 21.1% 25.8% 10.2% 6.4% 25.4% 24.5% 49.2% 50.9% 15.3% 18.2%
Hispanic 112 2.2% 0.2% 12.5% 17.2% 42.0% 39.2% 42.0% 37.4% 3.6% 6.1%
Black 41 -4.3% -5.1% 17.1% 20.8% 43.9% 41.0% 36.6% 32.7% 2.4% 5.5%
White 261 18.8% 27.3% 10.7% 6.3% 27.2% 23.0% 49.8% 51.0% 12.3% 19.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 60 -25.0% -27.1% 43.3% 42.5% 38.3% 41.3% 15.0% 15.1% 3.3% 1.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 26 -24.1% -30.0% 26.9% 35.7% 53.8% 51.0% 19.2% 12.9% 0.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 75 7.4% -0.3% 17.3% 17.4% 32.0% 39.5% 45.3% 37.3% 5.3% 5.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 7 Students Tested: 454
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School:
99.8%State:
99.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
21.2%State:
24.4%
Approaches Standard This School:
24.1%Nevada:
22.0%
Meets Standard This School:
37.1%State:
35.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
17.7%Nevada:
18.4%
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : -11.1%Nevada : -12.2%
Male
This School : -16.3%State : -19.0%
Female
This School : -6.0%Nevada : -5.1%
Asian
This School : -2.7%Nevada : 3.8%
Hispanic
This School : -21.0%State : -23.2%
Black
Here : -33.6%State : -29.2%
White
This School : -3.6%Nevada : 0.2%
Two or more Races
This School : 1.8%State : -3.1%
Individual Education Plan Students
Here : -57.6%Nevada : -54.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : -45.3%Nevada : -46.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : -23.1%Nevada : -23.9%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 454 -11.1% -12.2% 21.2% 24.4% 24.1% 22.0% 37.1% 35.3% 17.7% 18.4%
Male 227 -16.3% -19.0% 23.5% 30.6% 27.0% 22.5% 34.1% 32.8% 15.5% 14.1%
Female 227 -6.0% -5.1% 18.9% 17.8% 21.2% 21.5% 40.1% 38.0% 19.8% 22.9%
Asian 38 -2.7% 3.8% 7.9% 13.2% 29.0% 17.1% 44.7% 38.8% 18.4% 30.9%
Hispanic 148 -21.0% -23.2% 25.9% 31.2% 29.3% 26.1% 30.6% 32.2% 14.3% 10.5%
Black 31 -33.6% -29.2% 35.5% 38.1% 32.3% 25.3% 22.6% 27.6% 9.7% 9.1%
White 191 -3.6% 0.2% 18.3% 16.0% 19.4% 17.9% 40.8% 39.5% 21.5% 26.6%
Two or more Races 34 1.8% -3.1% 11.8% 17.8% 20.6% 19.4% 47.1% 39.0% 20.6% 23.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 24 -57.6% -54.9% 66.7% 70.7% 25.0% 18.4% 8.3% 9.2% 0.0% 1.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 34 -45.3% -46.5% 44.1% 52.7% 35.3% 27.9% 17.7% 17.3% 2.9% 2.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 188 -23.1% -23.9% 28.9% 32.4% 28.3% 25.5% 30.5% 31.6% 12.3% 10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 433 4.8% 8.1% 6.7% 4.7% 22.6% 21.3% 48.4% 49.5% 22.3% 24.5%
Male 234 0.5% 3.3% 9.9% 6.5% 23.7% 24.3% 47.0% 48.2% 19.4% 21.1%
Female 199 9.9% 13.0% 3.0% 2.9% 21.2% 18.2% 50.0% 50.8% 25.8% 28.1%
Asian 52 8.6% 18.3% 0.0% 1.9% 25.5% 13.9% 54.9% 49.6% 19.6% 34.6%
Hispanic 122 -0.3% -1.4% 8.2% 6.4% 26.2% 29.0% 52.5% 50.9% 13.1% 13.6%
Black 44 -9.1% -4.1% 15.9% 8.3% 27.3% 29.9% 45.5% 47.7% 11.4% 14.1%
White 212 10.8% 17.8% 4.8% 2.8% 18.6% 13.5% 45.7% 48.4% 31.0% 35.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 42 -54.0% -39.9% 40.5% 25.2% 47.6% 48.8% 9.5% 22.7% 2.4% 3.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -52.3% -39.9% 27.3% 17.8% 59.1% 56.2% 13.6% 25.2% 0.0% 0.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 135 -6.9% -2.0% 11.9% 7.2% 29.1% 28.9% 48.5% 49.7% 10.4% 14.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 498 15.9% 14.9% 2.4% 5.5% 27.0% 25.0% 53.8% 50.6% 16.7% 18.9%
Male 246 13.8% 9.3% 2.9% 7.3% 28.7% 28.7% 53.3% 47.8% 15.2% 16.1%
Female 252 17.9% 20.8% 2.0% 3.5% 25.4% 21.1% 54.4% 53.5% 18.3% 21.9%
American Indian 10 5.3% 9.0% 10.0% 5.9% 30.0% 30.5% 60.0% 50.4% 0.0% 13.3%
Asian 66 23.8% 26.4% 1.5% 2.8% 20.0% 16.2% 55.4% 52.6% 23.1% 28.5%
Hispanic 126 11.2% 4.9% 4.0% 7.4% 30.2% 33.0% 57.9% 49.4% 7.9% 10.2%
Black 58 5.7% 1.0% 5.2% 10.5% 34.5% 33.8% 44.8% 45.2% 15.5% 10.4%
White 238 19.2% 25.2% 0.8% 2.9% 25.3% 17.2% 53.2% 52.7% 20.7% 27.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 48 -35.5% -30.9% 17.0% 25.0% 63.8% 51.2% 14.9% 22.0% 4.3% 1.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -44.1% -30.2% 15.8% 18.0% 73.7% 57.5% 10.5% 23.9% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 118 4.7% 4.4% 1.7% 7.9% 39.0% 33.1% 50.0% 48.8% 9.3% 10.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 481 10.9% 9.6% 10.5% 10.2% 23.9% 25.5% 52.9% 52.2% 12.6% 12.0%
Male 263 3.4% 3.3% 13.8% 13.9% 28.1% 28.1% 50.4% 49.0% 7.7% 8.9%
Female 218 19.9% 16.1% 6.5% 6.5% 19.0% 22.8% 56.0% 55.5% 18.5% 15.2%
Asian 75 11.5% 22.8% 6.8% 4.9% 27.0% 17.6% 51.4% 58.4% 14.9% 19.1%
Hispanic 105 2.1% -2.6% 15.4% 14.7% 27.9% 33.3% 48.1% 46.6% 8.7% 5.5%
Black 44 -2.4% -3.1% 22.7% 16.4% 25.0% 32.0% 45.5% 44.8% 6.8% 6.8%
White 250 16.6% 20.9% 6.9% 5.9% 21.9% 18.6% 56.3% 57.8% 15.0% 17.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 57 -26.6% -35.0% 36.8% 39.4% 35.1% 41.0% 28.1% 18.8% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 25 -30.7% -34.2% 32.0% 31.3% 44.0% 48.3% 24.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 105 4.2% -2.9% 14.7% 14.7% 26.5% 33.5% 46.1% 46.3% 12.7% 5.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 522 26.9% 21.2% 5.8% 8.5% 24.0% 27.0% 55.6% 50.5% 14.6% 14.0%
Male 298 20.6% 14.9% 8.2% 11.5% 27.8% 30.3% 51.5% 47.1% 12.4% 11.0%
Female 224 35.1% 27.9% 2.7% 5.3% 18.9% 23.5% 60.8% 54.1% 17.6% 17.2%
Asian 43 31.1% 35.2% 4.7% 4.4% 20.9% 17.1% 51.2% 57.2% 23.3% 21.2%
Hispanic 140 30.8% 8.4% 6.5% 12.7% 19.4% 35.6% 64.0% 45.5% 10.1% 6.2%
Black 36 5.2% 7.7% 12.1% 13.0% 39.4% 35.9% 42.4% 44.1% 6.1% 7.0%
White 299 26.8% 32.9% 5.1% 4.5% 24.8% 19.3% 53.4% 55.0% 16.7% 21.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 52 -13.9% -21.8% 21.6% 31.1% 49.0% 47.4% 29.4% 19.7% 0.0% 1.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 18 -32.2% -23.1% 33.3% 28.1% 55.6% 51.7% 11.1% 19.7% 0.0% 0.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 89 17.6% 8.7% 13.8% 12.0% 25.3% 36.0% 57.5% 45.8% 3.4% 6.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 8
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
28.4%State:
26.6%
Exceeds Standard This School:
15.1%Nevada:
18.0%
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : -22.3%State : -21.3%
Male
This School : -27.2%State : -26.7%
Female
This School : -16.4%Nevada : -15.6%
Asian
Here : -17.9%Nevada : -4.8%
Pacific Islander
This School : -24.2%Nevada : -23.6%
Hispanic
Here : -30.5%State : -32.5%
Black
Here : -49.7%Nevada : -38.1%
White
Here : -15.9%Nevada : -9.3%
Two or more Races
This School : 4.9%Nevada : -12.6%
Individual Education Plan Students
This School : -58.0%Nevada : -58.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : -62.6%Nevada : -56.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : -36.7%Nevada : -32.6%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 438 -22.3% -21.3% 29.4% 27.6% 27.1% 27.8% 28.4% 26.6% 15.1% 18.0%
Male 240 -27.2% -26.7% 32.8% 33.0% 28.6% 27.8% 27.3% 24.4% 11.3% 14.8%
Female 198 -16.4% -15.6% 25.3% 22.0% 25.3% 27.7% 29.8% 29.0% 19.7% 21.3%
Asian 25 -17.9% -4.8% 20.0% 14.8% 32.0% 24.0% 32.0% 30.6% 16.0% 30.5%
Pacific Islander 12 -24.2% -23.6% 33.3% 26.6% 25.0% 31.1% 33.3% 29.4% 8.3% 12.9%
Hispanic 127 -30.5% -32.5% 37.8% 35.4% 26.8% 31.2% 22.8% 23.3% 12.6% 10.1%
Black 37 -49.7% -38.1% 48.7% 41.3% 35.1% 30.9% 13.5% 19.7% 2.7% 8.1%
White 210 -15.9% -9.3% 22.4% 19.3% 27.6% 24.1% 31.9% 30.8% 18.1% 25.9%
Two or more Races 26 4.9% -12.6% 20.8% 19.8% 8.3% 26.9% 45.8% 28.5% 25.0% 24.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 39 -58.0% -58.5% 79.0% 75.5% 13.2% 17.1% 7.9% 5.5% 0.0% 1.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 30 -62.6% -56.8% 73.3% 64.4% 23.3% 26.6% 3.3% 7.6% 0.0% 1.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 145 -36.7% -32.6% 39.6% 36.1% 31.3% 30.6% 24.3% 22.8% 4.9% 10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 502 1.2% 0.1% 3.0% 3.7% 29.9% 30.4% 47.2% 44.0% 19.9% 22.0%
Male 248 -0.6% -4.7% 4.0% 4.9% 30.6% 33.9% 46.4% 42.7% 19.0% 18.5%
Female 254 3.0% 5.1% 2.0% 2.3% 29.1% 26.7% 48.0% 45.4% 20.9% 25.6%
American Indian 11 -11.4% -5.3% 9.1% 5.7% 36.4% 33.7% 54.5% 45.7% 0.0% 14.9%
Asian 60 4.1% 12.2% 1.7% 1.6% 28.3% 20.3% 48.3% 45.7% 21.7% 32.4%
Hispanic 133 -8.0% -10.1% 3.8% 5.1% 38.3% 39.1% 47.4% 42.6% 10.5% 13.2%
Black 58 -15.9% -14.2% 6.9% 6.8% 43.1% 41.5% 34.5% 38.3% 15.5% 13.4%
White 240 10.4% 10.5% 1.7% 1.9% 22.1% 21.7% 49.6% 46.4% 26.7% 30.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 46 -39.8% -45.8% 15.2% 19.9% 58.7% 60.0% 26.1% 17.5% 0.0% 2.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 -47.1% -51.2% 12.5% 15.6% 68.8% 69.6% 18.8% 13.8% 0.0% 1.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 147 -8.8% -11.1% 4.8% 5.5% 38.1% 39.8% 42.9% 41.9% 14.3% 12.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 472 11.0% 6.2% 4.1% 5.1% 30.3% 34.0% 50.9% 46.2% 14.8% 14.7%
Male 255 6.5% 0.3% 4.8% 7.2% 34.0% 37.9% 50.8% 43.6% 10.4% 11.4%
Female 217 16.2% 12.4% 3.2% 2.9% 25.9% 30.1% 50.9% 48.9% 19.9% 18.2%
Asian 54 21.3% 19.3% 3.7% 2.1% 20.4% 23.9% 63.0% 51.6% 13.0% 22.3%
Hispanic 114 3.2% -6.6% 7.0% 7.3% 35.1% 44.6% 50.9% 40.7% 7.0% 7.4%
Black 44 -5.8% -7.5% 7.0% 8.5% 44.2% 44.3% 39.5% 40.1% 9.3% 7.1%
White 255 15.3% 18.0% 2.0% 2.9% 28.0% 24.5% 50.4% 51.2% 19.6% 21.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 56 -33.9% -38.4% 17.0% 23.6% 62.3% 60.1% 18.9% 15.0% 1.9% 1.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -31.9% -42.0% 18.2% 18.7% 59.1% 68.6% 22.7% 12.3% 0.0% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 108 3.4% -6.2% 2.9% 7.2% 39.0% 44.3% 49.5% 41.6% 8.6% 6.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 506 1.4% -0.5% 7.8% 8.7% 36.1% 37.1% 45.5% 42.3% 10.6% 11.8%
Male 278 -7.8% -5.9% 10.2% 11.2% 42.9% 40.0% 38.2% 39.5% 8.7% 9.4%
Female 228 12.6% 5.3% 4.9% 6.1% 27.9% 33.9% 54.4% 45.4% 12.8% 14.5%
Asian 50 13.3% 13.6% 8.0% 4.5% 24.0% 27.2% 52.0% 49.2% 16.0% 19.1%
Hispanic 142 -3.2% -15.2% 8.6% 12.9% 40.0% 47.6% 45.0% 34.2% 6.4% 5.3%
Black 36 -21.3% -17.3% 16.7% 15.0% 50.0% 47.6% 33.3% 32.4% 0.0% 5.0%
White 275 4.9% 13.8% 5.9% 4.4% 34.6% 27.1% 46.3% 50.5% 13.2% 18.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 45 -41.0% -41.4% 36.4% 34.0% 50.0% 52.7% 13.6% 12.3% 0.0% 0.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 12 -45.6% -45.7% 36.4% 31.6% 54.5% 59.5% 9.1% 8.5% 0.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 88 -13.3% -15.2% 10.3% 12.6% 48.3% 48.0% 39.1% 34.4% 2.3% 5.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 480 16.2% 13.6% 8.7% 7.3% 31.8% 35.9% 45.3% 44.3% 14.2% 12.5%
Male 248 9.2% 7.9% 12.3% 9.8% 35.2% 39.0% 42.2% 41.3% 10.2% 9.9%
Female 232 23.8% 19.6% 4.8% 4.6% 28.1% 32.5% 48.7% 47.5% 18.4% 15.3%
Asian 41 21.7% 25.4% 7.5% 4.5% 27.5% 26.8% 60.0% 50.2% 5.0% 18.5%
Hispanic 107 2.4% -1.9% 14.3% 10.9% 40.0% 47.7% 37.1% 36.2% 8.6% 5.2%
Black 43 -2.8% -2.2% 14.3% 12.4% 45.2% 46.5% 26.2% 35.3% 14.3% 5.8%
White 286 23.7% 27.6% 5.7% 3.7% 27.3% 25.4% 49.3% 51.9% 17.7% 19.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 53 -29.8% -30.3% 44.2% 29.0% 42.3% 57.9% 13.5% 12.3% 0.0% 0.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 24 -26.6% -34.6% 37.5% 26.5% 45.8% 64.8% 16.7% 8.4% 0.0% 0.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 80 4.1% -0.8% 17.9% 10.1% 34.6% 47.4% 34.6% 37.0% 12.8% 5.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 501 19.7% 7.7% 3.6% 8.3% 33.3% 40.7% 41.8% 37.1% 21.2% 13.9%
Male 258 15.2% 2.8% 5.9% 11.0% 35.6% 42.9% 39.5% 34.3% 19.0% 11.9%
Female 243 24.5% 12.8% 1.2% 5.4% 31.0% 38.5% 44.2% 40.1% 23.6% 16.0%
Asian 45 38.9% 20.0% 0.0% 4.1% 17.8% 32.5% 44.4% 42.9% 37.8% 20.4%
Hispanic 101 7.2% -8.2% 8.1% 12.1% 41.4% 52.9% 35.4% 28.9% 15.2% 6.2%
Black 50 -1.6% -8.8% 8.3% 14.7% 50.0% 50.8% 31.3% 28.0% 10.4% 6.5%
White 300 24.5% 21.3% 2.0% 4.6% 30.2% 30.8% 45.0% 44.3% 22.8% 20.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 47 -31.4% -31.3% 31.0% 30.8% 57.1% 57.2% 7.1% 10.5% 4.8% 1.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 -5.8% -30.8% 18.8% 22.8% 43.8% 64.7% 25.0% 10.5% 12.5% 2.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 69 6.0% -7.7% 6.0% 12.5% 44.8% 51.9% 37.3% 29.5% 11.9% 6.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 544 9.2% 7.6% 13.0% 10.6% 34.5% 38.6% 40.1% 38.0% 12.4% 12.8%
Male 269 6.0% 3.3% 16.4% 13.1% 34.3% 40.3% 41.0% 36.0% 8.2% 10.6%
Female 272 13.0% 12.5% 9.0% 7.6% 34.7% 36.6% 39.6% 40.4% 16.8% 15.3%
Asian 55 9.4% 18.1% 9.1% 5.7% 38.2% 32.9% 34.5% 44.6% 18.2% 16.9%
Hispanic 99 -5.5% -11.3% 21.4% 17.5% 40.8% 50.5% 31.6% 27.2% 6.1% 4.8%
Black 51 -10.6% -10.9% 24.5% 17.9% 42.9% 49.7% 26.5% 27.4% 6.1% 5.0%
White 334 16.8% 22.2% 9.3% 5.2% 30.6% 29.3% 45.9% 46.3% 14.1% 19.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 58 -33.0% -29.7% 55.2% 36.4% 34.5% 50.1% 10.3% 12.0% 0.0% 1.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 19 -32.8% -32.0% 47.4% 29.8% 42.1% 59.0% 10.5% 10.5% 0.0% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 67 -17.5% -9.3% 31.8% 16.8% 42.4% 49.2% 22.7% 28.5% 3.0% 5.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 534 33.2% 17.6% 5.4% 11.7% 29.4% 38.7% 42.1% 35.9% 23.0% 13.7%
Male 271 33.3% 12.8% 6.3% 14.7% 28.4% 40.5% 46.5% 33.8% 18.8% 11.0%
Female 248 34.9% 23.0% 4.4% 8.5% 28.6% 36.5% 37.9% 38.3% 29.0% 16.7%
Asian 54 31.0% 26.5% 9.3% 6.5% 27.8% 35.1% 44.4% 42.5% 18.5% 16.0%
Hispanic 85 19.8% -1.7% 5.9% 17.9% 42.4% 51.7% 37.6% 25.5% 14.1% 4.9%
Black 27 8.7% -2.1% 3.7% 20.2% 55.6% 49.9% 29.6% 25.0% 11.1% 4.9%
White 348 40.4% 31.8% 4.3% 7.1% 23.3% 29.2% 44.8% 43.3% 27.6% 20.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 38 -10.9% -20.7% 28.9% 39.2% 50.0% 49.5% 21.1% 10.5% 0.0% 0.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -18.4% -23.2% 18.2% 30.1% 68.2% 61.1% 9.1% 8.3% 4.5% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 65 9.5% 0.0% 10.8% 18.1% 47.7% 49.9% 30.8% 26.8% 10.8% 5.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 485 24.8% 33.9% 21.8% 26.4% 26.7% 22.4% 26.7% 17.3%
Male 265 30.0% 41.2% 24.9% 25.8% 22.9% 19.5% 22.1% 13.5%
Female 217 17.5% 26.5% 18.4% 26.9% 31.6% 25.4% 32.5% 21.1%
Asian 66 15.4% 17.2% 21.5% 22.1% 21.5% 27.6% 41.5% 33.1%
Black 44 34.1% 47.1% 22.7% 26.7% 31.8% 17.3% 11.4% 9.0%
White 255 19.7% 22.4% 21.3% 25.8% 29.1% 27.5% 29.9% 24.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 63 58.2% 79.1% 21.8% 14.4% 10.9% 4.5% 9.1% 2.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 27 63.0% 79.9% 14.8% 15.8% 11.1% 3.6% 11.1% 0.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 103 33.0% 48.0% 18.6% 27.5% 30.9% 16.8% 17.5% 7.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 529 26.0% 34.5% 23.3% 26.3% 25.8% 21.4% 25.0% 17.8%
Male 303 32.4% 41.5% 25.9% 26.0% 22.2% 18.2% 19.5% 14.3%
Female 226 17.5% 27.3% 19.7% 26.6% 30.5% 24.8% 32.3% 21.4%
Asian 43 19.0% 16.6% 7.1% 22.0% 21.4% 28.2% 52.4% 33.2%
Black 35 44.1% 46.9% 23.5% 26.7% 17.6% 16.8% 14.7% 9.6%
White 306 23.2% 22.6% 24.6% 25.7% 24.6% 26.0% 27.6% 25.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 56 70.6% 79.0% 19.6% 14.9% 9.8% 4.0% 0.0% 2.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 81.0% 81.8% 14.3% 14.3% 4.8% 3.3% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 87 38.4% 48.9% 24.4% 27.3% 22.1% 15.8% 15.1% 8.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 502 30.4% 34.6% 23.3% 25.5% 24.6% 21.7% 21.7% 18.3%
Male 269 37.8% 42.2% 22.8% 24.9% 23.2% 18.7% 16.2% 14.2%
Female 233 21.9% 26.7% 23.8% 26.0% 26.2% 24.8% 28.1% 22.4%
Asian 38 22.2% 18.2% 19.4% 21.5% 30.6% 26.4% 27.8% 33.9%
Hispanic 107 38.5% 49.4% 25.0% 27.1% 21.9% 15.5% 14.6% 8.0%
Black 47 40.5% 47.5% 23.8% 25.6% 16.7% 17.2% 19.0% 9.7%
White 304 26.9% 23.1% 22.9% 24.7% 26.2% 26.4% 24.0% 25.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 64 86.5% 81.2% 13.5% 13.8% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 1.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 37 57.6% 77.5% 21.2% 15.7% 9.1% 4.5% 12.1% 2.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 97 47.1% 49.0% 20.0% 26.5% 15.3% 16.2% 17.6% 8.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 547 27.2% 33.6% 23.3% 26.0% 23.9% 22.5% 25.6% 17.9%
Male 282 37.2% 40.9% 23.4% 25.9% 23.0% 19.4% 16.4% 13.7%
Female 265 16.5% 26.0% 23.2% 26.0% 24.8% 25.8% 35.4% 22.2%
Asian 53 21.6% 16.2% 15.7% 22.0% 19.6% 28.7% 43.1% 33.1%
Hispanic 104 33.0% 48.5% 23.0% 27.4% 25.0% 16.4% 19.0% 7.7%
Black 58 46.2% 45.8% 25.0% 26.8% 15.4% 18.0% 13.5% 9.4%
White 323 23.2% 23.2% 23.8% 25.2% 25.4% 26.9% 27.7% 24.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 44 78.4% 80.8% 5.4% 13.4% 16.2% 4.1% 0.0% 1.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 18 56.3% 75.4% 25.0% 18.3% 12.5% 4.8% 6.3% 1.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 77 48.5% 48.8% 21.2% 26.8% 16.7% 16.5% 13.6% 7.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 537 25.0% 35.5% 21.8% 25.0% 27.2% 22.0% 25.9% 17.5%
Male 274 33.0% 42.1% 23.8% 25.2% 23.8% 19.1% 19.4% 13.5%
Female 263 16.7% 28.4% 19.8% 24.7% 30.8% 25.1% 32.7% 21.8%
Asian 45 26.7% 18.1% 13.3% 21.8% 28.9% 28.5% 31.1% 31.6%
Hispanic 107 34.9% 49.6% 20.8% 26.6% 26.4% 16.1% 17.9% 7.7%
Black 40 32.5% 49.4% 30.0% 26.2% 22.5% 16.3% 15.0% 8.1%
White 342 21.1% 26.1% 22.5% 24.0% 27.8% 26.0% 28.7% 23.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 44 74.4% 81.4% 20.9% 12.9% 4.7% 4.3% 0.0% 1.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 75.0% 72.2% 20.0% 20.7% 5.0% 5.9% 0.0% 1.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 87 44.2% 49.3% 26.7% 26.8% 14.0% 15.9% 15.1% 8.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 485 24.6% 31.2% 23.8% 27.2% 22.1% 21.7% 29.6% 19.9%
Male 265 25.8% 33.7% 24.2% 25.9% 20.6% 20.3% 29.4% 20.2%
Female 217 22.2% 28.7% 23.6% 28.6% 24.1% 23.1% 30.2% 19.6%
Asian 66 18.8% 16.6% 17.2% 22.9% 15.6% 25.7% 48.4% 34.7%
Black 44 47.7% 47.8% 22.7% 27.2% 22.7% 16.4% 6.8% 8.6%
White 255 16.4% 20.7% 25.4% 25.1% 23.0% 25.9% 35.2% 28.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 63 61.8% 70.8% 18.2% 18.8% 12.7% 7.2% 7.3% 3.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 27 55.6% 67.3% 11.1% 23.2% 14.8% 7.0% 18.5% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 103 32.7% 43.3% 25.5% 29.6% 24.5% 17.2% 17.3% 9.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 529 21.0% 31.1% 26.6% 26.8% 23.7% 21.7% 28.7% 20.3%
Male 303 23.7% 33.8% 28.5% 25.6% 19.9% 19.9% 27.8% 20.8%
Female 226 17.4% 28.3% 24.1% 28.1% 28.6% 23.7% 29.9% 19.9%
Asian 43 16.3% 16.3% 7.0% 22.1% 20.9% 26.3% 55.8% 35.2%
Black 35 40.6% 47.6% 28.1% 27.6% 21.9% 16.9% 9.4% 7.9%
White 306 19.9% 20.2% 24.2% 24.9% 23.6% 25.3% 32.3% 29.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 56 70.0% 71.1% 16.0% 19.4% 10.0% 6.5% 4.0% 3.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 52.4% 68.1% 23.8% 22.1% 19.0% 7.0% 4.8% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 87 25.9% 43.3% 41.2% 29.3% 15.3% 17.7% 17.6% 9.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 502 21.2% 32.0% 23.9% 26.1% 23.5% 21.1% 31.4% 20.7%
Male 269 22.8% 35.1% 25.6% 24.6% 21.2% 19.2% 30.4% 21.1%
Female 233 19.4% 28.7% 22.1% 27.7% 26.1% 23.1% 32.4% 20.4%
Asian 38 8.1% 17.4% 27.0% 22.2% 29.7% 25.0% 35.1% 35.4%
Hispanic 107 29.8% 43.8% 26.0% 29.7% 21.2% 16.4% 23.1% 10.1%
Black 47 32.6% 49.3% 27.9% 26.7% 16.3% 15.4% 23.3% 8.7%
White 304 18.2% 21.1% 22.0% 24.0% 24.5% 25.3% 35.3% 29.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 64 71.7% 75.4% 18.9% 16.9% 7.5% 5.2% 1.9% 2.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 37 58.3% 67.1% 13.9% 22.6% 5.6% 6.8% 22.2% 3.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 97 29.1% 44.8% 34.9% 28.6% 19.8% 16.4% 16.3% 10.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 547 24.5% 31.5% 21.7% 27.0% 22.8% 21.5% 31.0% 20.0%
Male 282 28.6% 34.6% 19.2% 25.2% 22.8% 20.3% 29.3% 19.9%
Female 265 20.1% 28.2% 24.3% 29.0% 22.8% 22.7% 32.8% 20.2%
Asian 53 13.5% 16.9% 25.0% 22.6% 23.1% 26.8% 38.5% 33.7%
Hispanic 104 29.0% 43.8% 28.0% 30.2% 19.0% 16.6% 24.0% 9.4%
Black 58 50.0% 48.9% 21.4% 27.0% 14.3% 15.2% 14.3% 8.9%
White 323 20.1% 21.1% 18.9% 25.5% 25.2% 25.4% 35.8% 28.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 44 74.4% 74.9% 7.7% 17.4% 10.3% 5.2% 7.7% 2.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 18 50.0% 63.1% 25.0% 25.4% 18.8% 8.1% 6.3% 3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 77 46.5% 45.1% 28.2% 29.0% 9.9% 16.8% 15.5% 9.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 537 20.7% 34.3% 24.1% 25.4% 24.6% 21.3% 30.6% 19.0%
Male 274 21.6% 36.7% 26.0% 24.4% 22.7% 19.8% 29.7% 19.1%
Female 263 19.8% 31.6% 22.1% 26.6% 26.6% 22.8% 31.6% 19.0%
Asian 45 24.4% 19.9% 13.3% 22.8% 26.7% 25.7% 35.6% 31.7%
Hispanic 107 28.3% 46.6% 25.5% 28.3% 23.6% 16.5% 22.6% 8.6%
Black 40 32.5% 52.0% 37.5% 26.0% 15.0% 14.6% 15.0% 7.4%
White 342 16.7% 24.8% 23.4% 23.9% 25.7% 25.0% 34.2% 26.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 44 60.5% 77.9% 30.2% 14.3% 9.3% 5.6% 0.0% 2.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 60.0% 64.5% 30.0% 24.2% 5.0% 8.4% 5.0% 2.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 87 37.2% 47.5% 32.6% 27.1% 16.3% 16.5% 14.0% 8.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 485 20.9% 33.9% 27.4% 27.7% 24.9% 21.6% 26.8% 16.9%
Male 265 22.4% 36.9% 27.6% 26.4% 24.4% 19.9% 25.6% 16.9%
Female 217 17.8% 30.8% 27.7% 29.0% 25.8% 23.3% 28.6% 16.9%
Asian 66 16.9% 22.6% 27.7% 28.4% 27.7% 26.2% 27.7% 22.8%
Black 44 23.3% 46.8% 46.5% 29.2% 16.3% 15.8% 14.0% 8.1%
White 255 15.4% 19.5% 22.8% 26.4% 28.0% 27.4% 33.7% 26.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 63 55.4% 74.5% 30.4% 17.1% 7.1% 5.7% 7.1% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 27 74.1% 83.3% 14.8% 13.9% 11.1% 2.4% 0.0% 0.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 103 25.8% 49.0% 32.0% 28.3% 22.7% 15.7% 19.6% 7.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 529 23.9% 33.6% 24.7% 27.0% 25.8% 22.0% 25.6% 17.4%
Male 303 28.5% 37.0% 24.1% 25.3% 22.7% 20.4% 24.7% 17.3%
Female 226 17.9% 30.0% 25.4% 28.8% 29.9% 23.7% 26.8% 17.4%
Asian 43 23.3% 20.4% 11.6% 27.3% 23.3% 28.7% 41.9% 23.6%
Black 35 44.1% 46.5% 29.4% 29.4% 14.7% 16.0% 11.8% 8.1%
White 306 19.8% 19.5% 23.8% 25.5% 27.5% 27.4% 28.9% 27.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 56 73.1% 74.3% 21.2% 16.8% 3.8% 5.7% 1.9% 3.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 81.0% 83.7% 19.0% 13.1% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 0.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 87 34.9% 49.2% 31.4% 27.8% 22.1% 15.9% 11.6% 7.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 502 21.3% 34.1% 27.1% 26.6% 25.8% 21.8% 25.8% 17.6%
Male 269 25.5% 37.6% 25.1% 24.6% 25.5% 20.6% 23.9% 17.2%
Female 233 16.4% 30.4% 29.3% 28.7% 26.2% 23.0% 28.0% 17.9%
Asian 38 16.7% 23.0% 33.3% 26.8% 33.3% 27.2% 16.7% 23.0%
Hispanic 107 27.9% 51.3% 31.7% 26.8% 25.0% 15.0% 15.4% 6.9%
Black 47 28.3% 48.1% 37.0% 27.1% 21.7% 16.8% 13.0% 8.1%
White 304 17.9% 19.5% 23.3% 26.2% 26.0% 27.2% 32.8% 27.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 64 75.4% 75.5% 15.8% 16.8% 5.3% 5.3% 3.5% 2.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 37 57.1% 80.5% 25.7% 13.5% 8.6% 3.8% 8.6% 2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 97 35.2% 49.9% 24.2% 26.9% 26.4% 15.7% 14.3% 7.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 547 21.6% 33.3% 23.3% 26.8% 27.4% 22.4% 27.8% 17.5%
Male 282 23.2% 36.4% 23.9% 25.4% 24.6% 20.8% 28.3% 17.4%
Female 265 19.9% 30.1% 22.6% 28.2% 30.3% 24.2% 27.2% 17.6%
Asian 53 22.6% 21.7% 20.8% 28.4% 22.6% 28.5% 34.0% 21.4%
Hispanic 104 29.4% 51.2% 25.5% 26.9% 23.5% 15.2% 21.6% 6.6%
Black 58 41.1% 46.5% 23.2% 27.7% 17.9% 17.1% 17.9% 8.7%
White 323 15.0% 19.8% 23.6% 26.0% 30.7% 27.7% 30.7% 26.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 44 64.1% 75.5% 17.9% 16.4% 10.3% 5.6% 7.7% 2.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 18 58.8% 77.9% 29.4% 16.8% 5.9% 4.3% 5.9% 0.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 77 45.2% 49.6% 21.9% 27.5% 20.5% 15.7% 12.3% 7.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 537 20.5% 35.1% 25.9% 26.2% 25.6% 20.4% 28.0% 18.4%
Male 274 25.6% 38.1% 26.4% 25.3% 23.4% 18.9% 24.5% 17.8%
Female 263 15.2% 31.8% 25.5% 27.1% 27.8% 22.0% 31.6% 19.0%
Asian 45 28.9% 25.1% 20.0% 30.0% 22.2% 23.2% 28.9% 21.6%
Hispanic 107 34.0% 52.7% 25.5% 26.6% 20.8% 13.4% 19.8% 7.4%
Black 40 25.0% 50.3% 40.0% 26.9% 22.5% 15.1% 12.5% 7.7%
White 342 14.9% 22.5% 24.9% 25.0% 28.1% 25.5% 32.2% 26.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 44 72.1% 76.6% 20.9% 15.1% 2.3% 5.5% 4.7% 2.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 60.0% 76.1% 30.0% 18.8% 10.0% 3.8% 0.0% 1.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 87 39.5% 50.6% 29.1% 26.8% 19.8% 14.5% 11.6% 8.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Jack Lund Schofield Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 485 25.2% 29.2% 26.5% 28.5% 19.9% 22.2% 28.4% 20.1%
Male 265 27.7% 32.0% 28.9% 27.9% 18.0% 20.3% 25.4% 19.8%
Female 217 21.1% 26.3% 23.9% 29.1% 22.5% 24.2% 32.4% 20.4%
Asian 66 21.5% 19.7% 26.2% 25.8% 18.5% 27.5% 33.8% 27.0%
Black 44 31.8% 43.3% 40.9% 31.1% 11.4% 16.7% 15.9% 8.9%
White 255 21.0% 17.2% 23.8% 24.9% 20.6% 26.9% 34.7% 31.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 63 57.9% 58.7% 21.1% 28.1% 15.8% 9.3% 5.3% 3.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 27 59.3% 67.3% 33.3% 27.3% 3.7% 4.5% 3.7% 0.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 103 28.6% 41.3% 27.6% 31.6% 19.4% 17.5% 24.5% 9.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 529 22.1% 29.3% 25.6% 28.1% 25.6% 22.6% 26.7% 20.0%
Male 303 26.4% 31.7% 26.8% 27.6% 20.0% 20.8% 26.8% 19.9%
Female 226 16.4% 26.8% 24.0% 28.7% 32.9% 24.5% 26.7% 20.0%
Asian 43 18.6% 17.6% 11.6% 26.0% 27.9% 29.0% 41.9% 27.3%
Black 35 35.3% 44.8% 32.4% 29.9% 17.6% 16.3% 14.7% 8.9%
White 306 20.1% 16.9% 25.1% 24.5% 22.7% 27.6% 32.1% 31.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 56 60.8% 57.1% 29.4% 29.2% 9.8% 9.6% 0.0% 4.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 66.7% 68.9% 23.8% 25.7% 9.5% 4.4% 0.0% 1.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 87 35.6% 41.7% 25.3% 31.7% 21.8% 17.7% 17.2% 8.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 502 23.2% 29.6% 24.2% 27.9% 24.2% 22.2% 28.3% 20.2%
Male 269 25.5% 32.7% 25.9% 27.1% 23.9% 20.0% 24.7% 20.2%
Female 233 20.6% 26.4% 22.4% 28.8% 24.6% 24.4% 32.5% 20.3%
Asian 38 16.2% 20.2% 27.0% 28.4% 27.0% 25.0% 29.7% 26.5%
Hispanic 107 27.6% 43.3% 31.4% 31.4% 25.7% 16.6% 15.2% 8.7%
Black 47 36.4% 44.5% 22.7% 29.4% 20.5% 16.5% 20.5% 9.5%
White 304 20.5% 17.2% 20.9% 24.7% 24.2% 27.5% 34.3% 30.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 64 69.1% 60.0% 23.6% 27.0% 3.6% 9.3% 3.6% 3.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 37 61.1% 68.6% 13.9% 23.4% 11.1% 5.6% 13.9% 2.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 97 33.3% 42.7% 23.3% 30.6% 22.2% 17.0% 21.1% 9.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 547 26.0% 28.8% 23.4% 28.8% 23.8% 22.9% 26.8% 19.5%
Male 282 32.0% 31.5% 23.4% 28.3% 17.6% 20.8% 27.0% 19.4%
Female 265 19.6% 25.8% 23.5% 29.4% 30.4% 25.2% 26.5% 19.6%
Asian 53 22.6% 18.8% 15.1% 27.6% 32.1% 28.2% 30.2% 25.4%
Hispanic 104 35.6% 42.6% 26.7% 32.6% 20.8% 16.7% 16.8% 8.0%
Black 58 41.1% 43.0% 23.2% 31.7% 19.6% 16.7% 16.1% 8.6%
White 323 20.7% 17.5% 23.2% 25.4% 24.1% 27.9% 32.0% 29.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 44 62.5% 60.6% 20.0% 27.3% 12.5% 8.3% 5.0% 3.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 18 64.7% 65.3% 29.4% 27.6% 0.0% 5.7% 5.9% 1.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 77 41.7% 41.8% 23.6% 32.1% 22.2% 17.3% 12.5% 8.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 537 25.4% 32.4% 16.8% 22.3% 27.8% 24.7% 30.0% 20.6%
Male 274 30.0% 35.0% 17.2% 22.2% 25.3% 22.8% 27.5% 20.1%
Female 263 20.5% 29.7% 16.4% 22.5% 30.4% 26.7% 32.7% 21.1%
Asian 45 35.6% 22.3% 8.9% 21.3% 24.4% 32.5% 31.1% 23.9%
Hispanic 107 36.8% 47.2% 20.8% 26.0% 24.5% 19.0% 17.9% 7.8%
Black 40 35.0% 50.3% 30.0% 23.0% 20.0% 18.1% 15.0% 8.6%
White 342 19.6% 21.2% 15.2% 20.0% 29.8% 28.4% 35.4% 30.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 44 60.5% 63.7% 27.9% 22.1% 9.3% 10.3% 2.3% 3.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 65.0% 67.7% 30.0% 22.6% 5.0% 8.4% 0.0% 1.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 87 43.0% 45.7% 26.7% 25.4% 19.8% 19.2% 10.5% 9.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Enterprise, NV
Jack Lund Schofield Middle School in Enterprise, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: