
Back to: Oakland Park, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 57.
6000 NE 9TH AVE
Oakland Park, FL 33334
Other nearby schools ratings:
James S. Rickards Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Broward County:  47  Oakland Park:  37  James S. Rickards Middle School:  57 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Phone: (754) 3224400 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 2121
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 3224485
Principal: Ronald Forsman, Jr.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 92
Senate District: 25
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  87%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  82%  State average from 612 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 613 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  69%  State average from 612 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  72%  State average from 613 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  59%  State average from 612 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  59%  State average from 613 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  60%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  574  State average from 613 schools:  545 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  31%  State average from 614 schools:  56% 
Minority RateHere:  39%  State average from 614 schools:  49% 
Region: 5
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 338 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 338 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 317
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 317
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 205 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 205 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 191
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 191
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 38
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 65
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 102
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 78
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  87%  State average from 613 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  87%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 613 schools:  92% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  72%  State average from 613 schools:  49% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  75%  State average from 613 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  67%  State average from 613 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  69%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  48%  State average from 613 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  596  State average from 613 schools:  553 
Percent TestedJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math: NO
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  23%  State average from 613 schools:  52% 
Minority RateHere:  33%  State average from 613 schools:  48% 
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 337 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 337 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 331
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 321
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 331
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 321
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 225 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 218
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 218
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 72
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 86
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 86
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  87%  State average from 603 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  86%  State average from 603 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  84%  State average from 603 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  61%  State average from 602 schools:  46% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  68%  State average from 602 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  72%  State average from 602 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  55%  State average from 602 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  75%  State average from 602 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  588  State average from 602 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 604 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  21%  State average from 605 schools:  49% 
Minority RateHere:  34%  State average from 605 schools:  48% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 349 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 349 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 343
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 334
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 343
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 334
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 234 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 228
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 228
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 68
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 78
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  61%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  65%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 539 schools:  91% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  39%  State average from 538 schools:  44% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  58%  State average from 539 schools:  61% 
Making Math GainsHere:  67%  State average from 539 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  61%  State average from 539 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  59%  State average from 539 schools:  67% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  503  State average from 539 schools:  523 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 539 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  55%  State average from 541 schools:  49% 
Minority RateHere:  57%  State average from 542 schools:  53% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1009 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1008 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 341
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 950
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 949
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 431 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 430 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 145
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 414
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 414
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 385 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 385 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 139
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 371
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 371
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 561 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 561 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 185
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 224 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 209
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  22%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  30%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  61%  State average from 526 schools:  64% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  61%  State average from 526 schools:  63% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  82%  State average from 526 schools:  89% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  71%  State average from 526 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  71%  State average from 526 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  79%  State average from 526 schools:  72% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  425  State average from 526 schools:  425 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 526 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  54%  State average from 525 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  57%  State average from 526 schools:  52% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1022 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1021 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 332
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 987
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 986
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 432 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 431 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 135
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 416
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 415
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 193 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 71
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  39%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 186
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 186
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 374 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 374 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 119
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 363
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 363
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 551 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 551 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 176
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 532
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 532
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 251 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 251 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 79
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  30%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 241
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 241
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 38
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 132
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  28%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 132
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  53%  State average from 505 schools:  59% 
Meeting High Standards in MathJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  60%  State average from 505 schools:  60% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  79%  State average from 506 schools:  83% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  59%  State average from 505 schools:  61% 
Making Math GainsJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  70%  State average from 505 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  67%  State average from 505 schools:  66% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  388  State average from 506 schools:  397 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 506 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  59%  State average from 506 schools:  51% 
Minority RateHere:  58%  State average from 506 schools:  50% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1438  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  16%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  40%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  76%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1722  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  344  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  41%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  19%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  85%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  10  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1756  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  11%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  36%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  81%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1519  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  277  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  37%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  28%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  35%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  2  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1659  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  289  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  31%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  30%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  10%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  39%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1736  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  279  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  38%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  36%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  21%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  25%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  25%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  42%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  16%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  64%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  249  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  65%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  9%  State average:  31% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  9%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  5  State average:  7 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1545  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  353  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  6%  State average:  8% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  20%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  83%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1652  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  345  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  5%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  14%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  16%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  81%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1708  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  341  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  20%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  65%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1567  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  43%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  28%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  24%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  29%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1710  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  35%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  31%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  8%  State average:  19% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  35%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1796  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  28%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  32%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  40%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1454  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1669  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1719  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  322  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1547  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  282  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1665  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1861  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  269  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1576  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  360  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1656  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  346  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1743  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  349  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1623  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1762  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  299  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1858  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 85%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 187
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 93%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1440  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1628  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1700  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1517  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  276  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1618  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  281  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1821  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  296  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  264  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1535  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  351  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1642  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  343  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1731  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  346  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1566  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1737  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  293  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1861  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  120  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  642  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
Strategies (max 10)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  660  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Literary (max 18)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  15  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  9  State average:  8 
Strategies (max 10)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  8  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  123  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  675  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  190  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  642  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Functional (max 18)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  11  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  6  State average:  8 
Critical Analysis (max 12)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  8  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  207  State average:  201 
Mean Scale ScoreJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  661  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  12  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  8  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  151  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  670  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Literary (max 18)JAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  12  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 106
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  311  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  CombinedJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  4  State average:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 77%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 153
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  272  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 32%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 88%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1666  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1681  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1601  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 80
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1753  State average from 808 schools:  1746 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  305 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1764  State average:  1743 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1688  State average:  1668 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 76
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1833  State average from 819 schools:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  294 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1851  State average:  1807 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1772  State average:  1738 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 79
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  287  State average:  290 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1695  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1703  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1707  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1791  State average from 804 schools:  1777 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1802  State average:  1774 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1674  State average:  1645 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 128
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1885  State average from 815 schools:  1851 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1901  State average:  1845 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1824  State average:  1755 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 76
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 341
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  670  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 62
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 307
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  674  State average from 796 schools:  675 
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 349
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  688  State average from 810 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 341
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  673  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 306
Mean Scale ScoreJAMES S. RICKARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL:  685  State average from 796 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 349
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  706  State average from 810 schools:  698 
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 347
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  283  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17  Combined: 10
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 71%
