City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 38.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Hospital/Homebound School (17.2 miles): | 90 |
| Land O'Lakes High School (12.7 miles): | 62 |
| Alonso High School (12.3 miles): | 49 |
| Wharton High School (19.5 miles): | 40 |
| James W. Mitchell High School: | 38 |
| Countryside High School (12.1 miles): | 31 |
| Brooks Debartolo Collegiate High School (17.0 miles): | 19 |
| Ewes - E-Tu-Makee Camp School (16.5 miles): | 3 |
| Mendez Exceptional Center School (19.7 miles): | 0 |
James W. Mitchell High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Pasco County: | 43 |
| New Port Richey: | 44 |
| James W. Mitchell High School: | 38 |
1
mj warner
Sep 26, 2011 @ 7:19 pm
Has Mitchell High School been given its grade since the information below was published and what it is? Thank you.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 51
School number: 73
School type: Senior High
District Name: PASCO
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 774-9291
Principal: James W Michaels
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 45
Senate District: 11
School Web Address: WWW.PASCO.K12.FL.US
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 58% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 59% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 529 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 866 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 858 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 407
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 805
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 797
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 729 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 721 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 350
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 679
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 672
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 275 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 254
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 77% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 494 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 98% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1237 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1233 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1130
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1019 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1015 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 939
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 931
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 452 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 450 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 401
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 395
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (94%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 522 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1342 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1333 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1231
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1216
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1123 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1113 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1036
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1021
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 406 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 404 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 358
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 352
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1146 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 275 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 32% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1364 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 283 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 36% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 43% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1491 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 282 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 1 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1605 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 278 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 23% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1719 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 275 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2007 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 328 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2056 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 70% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 24% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 275 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 273 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 53% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 13% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 36% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 1% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1388 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1453 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 299 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 56% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 313 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1673 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 277 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 38% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 15% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1793 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 17% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1964 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 8% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 70% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2051 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1043 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%| Here: | 258 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1425 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1397 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%| Here: | 265 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1744 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 280 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1974 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1974 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 62%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%| Here: | 256 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1256 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 290 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1425 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1495 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 1798 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 296 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1973 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2014 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 87%| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 165
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 2| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 605
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 1| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 725 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%| Here: | 205 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 1338 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| Here: | 254 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1269 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%| Here: | 232 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1553 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%| Here: | 240 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1949 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%| Here: | 225 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%| Here: | 179 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 743 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%| Here: | 180 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 1
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1170 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%| Here: | 193 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 1
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1600 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%| Here: | 246 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1949 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 573 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 97 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 627 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 35 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 19 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 618 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 201 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 636 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 621 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 699 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 66 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| JAMES W. MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 237 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 50%| Here: | 243 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2023 Advameg, Inc.