Janie Howard Wilson School in Lake Wales, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 30.

306 FLORIDA AVE
Lake Wales, FL 33853

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bartow Elementary Academy School (15.3 miles):

93
Valleyview Elementary School (12.8 miles):

62
Frostproof Elementary School (12.6 miles):

49
Floral Avenue Elementary School (15.6 miles):

44
Chain Of Lakes Elementary School (5.8 miles):

34
Janie Howard Wilson School:

30
Floral Avenue Elementary School (15.6 miles):

26
Auburndale Central Elementary School (15.5 miles):

17
Janie Howard Wilson School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Lake Wales:

37
Janie Howard Wilson School:

30

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 678-4211 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1401
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 678-4217
Principal: Beverly Y Lynne
Conversion charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 5 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 66
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://lwcharterschools.com/janiehoward

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

49%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

492
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 216

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 216
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

88%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

555
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 263 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 264 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 226 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 200

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

37%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

46%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

493
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 276 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 276 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 232
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 240 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 202
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

23%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

441
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 304
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 304
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 291 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 291 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

64%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

351
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 354 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 353 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 131
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 344
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 343
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 341 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 340 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 125

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 331
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 330
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 330 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 118

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 321
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 320
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (94%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

86%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

85%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

446
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1320
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

303
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1557
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

316
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1563
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1572
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

12
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1745
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

1783
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

272
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

56%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

4%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

4%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1368
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

11%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1549
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

335
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1596
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

292
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

32%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1804
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1830
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

52%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

1380
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1551
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1585
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1589
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1710
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1896
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

310
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

284
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1440
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1579
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1617
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1607
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1754
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

1836
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 80
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 57%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 30%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1340
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1500
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1531
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1488
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1798
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1405
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1519
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1622
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1576
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1836
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

95
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

624
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

53
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

97
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

84
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

661
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

67
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

18
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

45
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

23
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

23
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

683
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

60
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 95
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

297
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

295
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 65%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

1255
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1405
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1427
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1345
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 81

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1479
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1484
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1449
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 35

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1352
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1403
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

288
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1413
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1348
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 65

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1595
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1605
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1482
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 123

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale Score
Here:

614
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 98
Mean Scale Score
Here:

624
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 119
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale Score
Here:

613
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 53
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 98
Mean Scale Score
JANIE HOWARD WILSON SCHOOL:

627
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 56
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 119
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 96
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

280
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Lake Wales, FL
  5. Janie Howard Wilson School in Lake Wales, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.