City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 52.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
701 16 ST S
St Petersburg, FL 33705
St Petersburg, FL 33705
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| St. Petersburg Collegiate High School (4.5 miles): | 96 |
| Oasis Middle School (20.0 miles): | 68 |
| St. Petersburg High School (1.3 miles): | 53 |
| John Hopkins Middle School: | 52 |
| Countryside High School (18.2 miles): | 41 |
| Pinellas Park Middle School (6.8 miles): | 34 |
| Palmetto High School (17.0 miles): | 24 |
| Tyrone Middle School (4.6 miles): | 13 |
John Hopkins Middle School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| St Petersburg: | 45 |
| John Hopkins Middle School: | 52 |
1
Emily Knight
Jan 22, 2011 @ 10:10 am
Bravo for turnaround! (ST.PETE TIMES 1/21/2011) Can you e-mail or send me a copy of your "consistent discipline and explicit student expectations" to share with other teachers facing the same problems as at your school? Thank you.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 52
School number: 4061
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 9
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 893-1600
Magnet School.
Principal: Barry G Brown
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 55
Senate District: 18
School Web Address: http://www.hopkins-ms.pinellas.k12.fl.us
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 53% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 52% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 31% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 60% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 464 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 471 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 81% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 91% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1157 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1157 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 369
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1053
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1040
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 338 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 338 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 129
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 317
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 317
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 644 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 644 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 180
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 574
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 563
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 818 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 818 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 732
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 719
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 52% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 34% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 33% |
Making Reading Gains
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 63% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 60% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 524 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 467 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 74% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 75% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1241 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1240 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 410
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1142
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 430 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 430 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 146
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 396
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 608 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 608 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 561
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 561
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 767 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 767 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 705
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 703
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 187
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 187
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 29% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 513 |
| State average from 3 schools: | 507 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 67% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 3 schools: | 68% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1217 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1216 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1113
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 476 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 476 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 168
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 444
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 445
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 537 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 535 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 489
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 488
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 657 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 655 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 587
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 588
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 175
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 175
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 28% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 587 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 491 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 68% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 89% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 517 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 517 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 99% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 255 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 255 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 54% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 90% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 72% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 478 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 424 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 72% |
Minority Rate
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 89% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 522 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 522 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 261 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 261 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 270 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 270 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 50% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 81% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 87% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 56% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 58% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 492 |
| State average from 4 schools: | 358 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 72% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 4 schools: | 88% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1401 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1610 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 20 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1695 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 30% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1573 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 17% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1786 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 22% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1844 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 31% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 28% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 3% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1671 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 266 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 26% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 287 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1586 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 362 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1604 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 80% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1688 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 28% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 286 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1748 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 23% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1858 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 311 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 20% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 56% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1683 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 231 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 4 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1382 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1632 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 09%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1717 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1693 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1775 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1853 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%| Here: | 279 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1513 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1604 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1675 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 334 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1665 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1765 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1848 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 141
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 1| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 426
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1443 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1654 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1692 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1645 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1765 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1871 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 307 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1491 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1669 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 349 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1716 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1591 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 291 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1744 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1878 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 199 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 641 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 68 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 175 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 663 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 77 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 174 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 672 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 76 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 400 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 668 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 60 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 414 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 680 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 66 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 388 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 690 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 66 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 175
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%| Here: | 342 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 77%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 390
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%| Here: | 288 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1516 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1680 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1720 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 186| Here: | 1534 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1694 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1725 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 69| Here: | 1656 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 316 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1547 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1663 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1689 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 156| Here: | 1533 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1688 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1710 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 87| Here: | 1623 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 160
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 76| Here: | 652 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 167
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 74| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 191
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 80| Here: | 677 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 159
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 82| JOHN HOPKINS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 654 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 167
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 85| Here: | 671 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 191
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 77| Here: | 669 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 168
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%| Here: | 341 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 78%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 94%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.