|
Back to: Kayenta, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 34.
Address: N. Highway 189
Kayenta, WI 86033
Grade span: 3-5
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 05:00 PM
Principal: Mrs. Gillian Louise Vormittag
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 697-2371
Fax: (928) 697-2382
Homepage: www.kayenta.k12.az.us
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 4
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: |  21.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: |  22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Enrollment In 2002: 512
Enrollment In 2003: 507
Enrollment In 2004: 435
Enrollment In 2005: 423
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| This school: | 99.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 100.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 90.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 32.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: .00
Teacher Count In 2005: 33.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: .00
Teacher Count In 2006: 29.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: .00
Teacher Count In 2007: 31.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: .00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: No
Grade 3
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 160
All Students Percent Tested: 103%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 740 schools: | 9.60% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 16.72% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 55.74% |
Female Tested: 77
Female Percent Tested: 96%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 747 schools: | 16.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 56.15% |
Male Tested: 79
Male Percent Tested: 105%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 657 schools: | 14.58% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 763 schools: | 17.90% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 62.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 55.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 152
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 106%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 8.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 840 schools: | 16.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 56.41% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 19.99% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 16.0% | | State average from 735 schools: | 22.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 18.64% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 20.36% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 137
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 23.28% |
Female Tested: 71
Female Percent Tested: 99%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 12.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 12.64% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 16.43% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 47.77% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 12.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 27.03% |
Male Tested: 66
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 16.63% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 18.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 46.86% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 14
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 350 schools: | 26.43% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 39.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 123
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 14.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 53.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 24.53% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 74
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 123
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 20.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 22.00% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 22.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 13.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 742 schools: | 48.49% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 31.38% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 753 schools: | 21.15% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 615 schools: | 14.46% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 137
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 10.31% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 25.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 3: | 41.0% | | State average from 925 schools: | 54.83% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 11.29% |
Female Tested: 64
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 24.30% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 56.93% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 13.46% |
Male Tested: 73
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 12.75% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 27.38% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 52.84% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 11.07% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 15
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 29.12% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 86.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 37.29% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 34.64% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 122
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 8.70% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 24.05% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 58.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 12.34% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 45
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 57.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 43.12% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.06% |
Limited English Proficient Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 109 schools: | 3.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 126
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 6.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 35.14% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 46.72% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 489 schools: | 5.11% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 11
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 742 schools: | 16.32% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 3: | 36.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 63.01% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 17.84% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 618 schools: | 9.81% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 22.22% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 130
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 11.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 3: | 43.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 879 schools: | 11.34% |
Female Tested: 70
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 660 schools: | 9.08% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Male Tested: 60
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 13.29% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 2.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 10.42% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 120
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 871 schools: | 12.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 116
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 43.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 591 schools: | 6.46% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 770 schools: | 16.24% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 62.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 17.79% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 14.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 600 schools: | 5.24% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 153
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 18.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 10.03% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 39.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 25.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 36.04% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 834 schools: | 30.22% |
Female Tested: 80
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 585 schools: | 10.75% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 26.18% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 36.57% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 30.99% |
Male Tested: 73
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 609 schools: | 11.85% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 25.83% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 36.40% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 30.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 145
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 101%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 9.44% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 25.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 866 schools: | 36.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 30.96% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 137
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 30.01% |
Female Tested: 71
Female Percent Tested: 99%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 14.62% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 24.99% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 33.20% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 30.75% |
Male Tested: 66
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 16.25% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 23.57% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 32.66% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 30.71% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 14
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 358 schools: | 36.58% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 377 schools: | 31.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 123
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 3: | 22.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 9.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 31.49% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 74
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 123
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 20.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 661 schools: | 30.12% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 19.99% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 11.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 9.73% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 732 schools: | 33.73% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 39.34% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 136
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 10.99% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 51.29% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 863 schools: | 20.62% |
Female Tested: 63
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 11.33% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 39.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 18.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 52.46% |
Male Tested: 73
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 12.22% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 18.70% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 50.15% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 22.06% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 15
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 454 schools: | 31.27% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 469 schools: | 28.05% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 474 schools: | 35.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 121
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 9.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 17.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 63.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 53.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 22.42% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 45
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 30.30% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 44.63% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 125
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 15.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 25.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 50.39% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 10.72% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 11
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 582 schools: | 6.95% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 12.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 762 schools: | 52.33% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 31.11% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 131
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 29.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Female Tested: 71
Female Percent Tested: 99%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 19.32% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 18.74% |
Male Tested: 60
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 830 schools: | 19.73% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 121
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 8.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 55.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 117
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 619 schools: | 7.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 757 schools: | 12.62% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 54.52% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 28.11% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 167
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 19.36% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 41.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 24.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 45.50% |
Female Tested: 85
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 17.15% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 24.58% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 47.61% |
Male Tested: 81
Male Percent Tested: 96%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 22.69% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 25.12% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 785 schools: | 43.42% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 154
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 97%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 18.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 24.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 46.28% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 105
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 128%
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 776 schools: | 11.55% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 3.0% | | State average from 642 schools: | 11.14% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 2.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 11.95% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 195
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 37.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 12.28% |
Female Tested: 94
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 774 schools: | 24.29% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 23.51% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 41.36% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Tested: 101
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 22.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 37.25% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 21
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 59.97% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 328 schools: | 26.07% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 174
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 32.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 784 schools: | 13.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 163
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 42.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 26.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 30.71% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 32
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 22.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 17.20% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 738 schools: | 20.23% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 30.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 46.59% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 17.72% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 12.47% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 6.64% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 167
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 10.88% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 908 schools: | 23.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 920 schools: | 57.71% |
Female Tested: 93
Female Percent Tested: 99%
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 21.86% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 44.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 60.56% |
Male Tested: 74
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 13.43% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 25.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 30.0% | | State average from 841 schools: | 54.99% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 83%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 78.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 33.87% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 487 schools: | 36.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 158
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 21.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 906 schools: | 61.89% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 34
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 94%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 345 schools: | 41.11% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 33.27% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 147
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 16.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 32.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 49.11% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 537 schools: | 6.11% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 15.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 66.20% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Grade 5: | 2.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 9.64% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 10.07% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 673 schools: | 11.77% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 8.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Grade 5: | 2.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 10.76% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 36.0% | | State average from 341 schools: | 25.38% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 4.39% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 15.40% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 148
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Female Tested: 75
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 8.85% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 22.65% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 60.68% |
Male Tested: 73
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 13.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 139
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 7.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 130
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 13.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 586 schools: | 6.04% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 15.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 65.54% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 9.55% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 681 schools: | 9.36% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 826 schools: | 10.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 4.13% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 166
All Students Percent Tested: 97%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 13.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 12.45% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 37.01% |
Female Tested: 84
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 12.82% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 40.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 759 schools: | 13.07% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 3.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 37.27% |
Male Tested: 81
Male Percent Tested: 96%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 679 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 37.80% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 3.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 37.28% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 153
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 96%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 754 schools: | 12.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 66.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 12.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 38.07% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 103
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 126%
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 197
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 13.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Female Tested: 95
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 14.20% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 41.56% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 14.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 32.52% |
Male Tested: 102
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.56% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 13.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 788 schools: | 33.45% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 21
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 43.65% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 198 schools: | 16.26% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 176
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 19.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 13.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 165
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 21.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 53.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 47.62% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 12.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 20.07% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 32
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 9.58% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 756 schools: | 33.44% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 716 schools: | 15.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 43.81% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 168
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 14.02% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 904 schools: | 19.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 47.89% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 846 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Tested: 94
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 13.27% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 19.81% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 49.58% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 20.81% |
Male Tested: 74
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.23% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.29% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 844 schools: | 46.18% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 763 schools: | 21.36% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 83%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 78.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 43.09% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 22.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 27.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 159
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 10.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 18.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 51.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 835 schools: | 22.65% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 35
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 97%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 348 schools: | 27.96% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 351 schools: | 30.11% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 352 schools: | 37.83% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 148
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 652 schools: | 20.35% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 697 schools: | 25.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 45.43% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 622 schools: | 10.58% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 13.21% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 50.40% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 681 schools: | 30.65% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 148
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 12.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 19.39% |
Female Tested: 75
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 749 schools: | 12.44% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 851 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 50.29% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.44% |
Male Tested: 73
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 19.30% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 20.50% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 139
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 24.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 21.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 130
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 9.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 9.85% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 14.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 782 schools: | 51.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 734 schools: | 28.54% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 134
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
| This school: | 51.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 829 schools: | 9.06% |
Female Tested: 61
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 10.36% |
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 845 schools: | 22.62% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 865 schools: | 59.58% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 10.99% |
Male Tested: 73
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 4: | 41.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 25.46% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 54.33% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 15
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 94%
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 60.0% | | State average from 459 schools: | 52.95% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 32.01% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 120
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 739 schools: | 9.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 9.85% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 43
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 98%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 336 schools: | 51.88% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 58.0% | | State average from 334 schools: | 35.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 127
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 17.58% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 723 schools: | 32.68% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 47.45% |
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 14.58% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 8.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 500 schools: | 4.21% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 134
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 4: | 8.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 24.20% |
Female Tested: 61
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 707 schools: | 11.07% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 17.42% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 74.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 49.82% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 24.72% |
Male Tested: 73
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 12.66% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 4: | 26.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 17.13% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 48.00% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 831 schools: | 24.74% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 14
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 88%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 425 schools: | 35.38% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 26.31% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 32.88% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 120
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 8.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 68.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 26.53% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 43
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 98%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 4: | 16.0% | | State average from 329 schools: | 27.32% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 335 schools: | 33.13% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 47.0% | | State average from 334 schools: | 36.67% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 127
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 662 schools: | 15.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 23.16% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 48.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 13.53% |
|
