Lake Brantley High School in Altamonte Springs, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 70.

991 SAND LAKE RD
Altamonte Springs, FL 32714

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Oviedo High School (12.3 miles):	83
Lake Brantley High School:	70
Seminole High School (10.8 miles):	65
Lake Technical Center School (19.6 miles):	56
Ae Asap School (5.3 miles):	45
Ocoee High School (9.6 miles):	32
Orlando Marine Institute #1 School (3.7 miles):	16
Excel High School (4.8 miles):	6

Lake Brantley High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Seminole County:	56
Altamonte Springs:	61
Lake Brantley High School:	70

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (407) 746-3450 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 59
School number: 491
School type: Senior High
District Name: SEMINOLE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 746-3600
Principal: Mary Williams
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 37
Senate District: 9
School Web Address: http://www.scps.k12.fl.us/schools/schoolinfopage.cfm?schoolnumber=0491

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 451 schools:	62%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	86%
State average from 451 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	87%
State average from 452 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	51%
State average from 451 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	59%
State average from 452 schools:	58%

Making Math Gains

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	82%
State average from 449 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	49%
State average from 452 schools:	52%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 452 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	556
State average from 452 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 450 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	29%
State average from 454 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	40%
State average from 454 schools:	47%

Region: 2

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1509 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1503 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 708
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1447
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1365

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1443
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1360
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 891 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 888 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 417
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 870
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 820

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 867
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 815
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 340 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 339 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 164
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 318
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 302
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 494 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 488 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 219
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 453
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 425

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 422
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 443 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	86%
State average from 440 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	83%
State average from 443 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	50%
State average from 443 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	57%
State average from 441 schools:	59%

Making Math Gains

Here:	79%
State average from 442 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 442 schools:	56%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 441 schools:	66%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	537
State average from 441 schools:	522

Percent Tested

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	98%
State average from 448 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	24%
State average from 446 schools:	46%

Minority Rate

Here:	38%
State average from 451 schools:	45%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1469 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1464 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 679
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1409
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1301

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1398
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1286
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 891 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 889 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 431
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 871
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 811

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 862
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 799
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 322 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 319 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 135
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 302
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 279

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 407 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 403 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 171
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 354

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 345
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	64%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	88%
State average from 425 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	88%
State average from 425 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	48%
State average from 425 schools:	45%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	84%
State average from 425 schools:	74%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	50%
State average from 425 schools:	55%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	75%
State average from 425 schools:	71%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	561
State average from 425 schools:	526

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 425 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	19%
State average from 425 schools:	42%

Minority Rate

Here:	36%
State average from 425 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1536 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1526 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 716
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1461
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1362

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1449
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1348
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 949 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 946 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 460
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 911
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 868

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 912
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 867
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 312 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 346 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 341 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 137
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 324
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 287
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	61%
State average from 370 schools:	45%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	87%
State average from 370 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	89%
State average from 370 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	45%
State average from 370 schools:	41%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	56%
State average from 370 schools:	52%

Making Math Gains

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	81%
State average from 370 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	44%
State average from 370 schools:	49%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 370 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	542
State average from 370 schools:	482

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 370 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	16%
State average from 372 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	12%
State average from 372 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1081 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1077 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 526
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1053
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1048
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 956 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 953 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 475
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 933
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 929
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 199 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	56%
State average from 360 schools:	45%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	83%
State average from 361 schools:	68%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	85%
State average from 361 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Making Math Gains

Here:	82%
State average from 361 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	53%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	417
State average from 361 schools:	374

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 361 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	18%
State average from 362 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	10%
State average from 362 schools:	47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1058 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1062 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 473
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1005
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1011
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 947 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 947 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 417

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 901
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 902
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 90
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 202
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 204
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 47
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 113
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 113
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	51%
State average from 348 schools:	42%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	83%
State average from 348 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	92%
State average from 348 schools:	84%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	54%
State average from 348 schools:	51%

Making Math Gains

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	81%
State average from 348 schools:	73%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	59%
State average from 348 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	420
State average from 348 schools:	371

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 348 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	16%
State average from 347 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	9%
State average from 348 schools:	45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1534
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	43%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	88%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1789
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	355
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	3%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	41%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	22%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	94%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	22
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	1739
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	84%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1970
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	358
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	43%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	24%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	92%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2001
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	20%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2018
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2019
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	61%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2077
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	71%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	52%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	52%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	68%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	46%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	71%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	18%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	8%
State average:	5%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	1%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	50%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1552
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	42%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1738
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	365
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	5%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	40%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	23%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	93%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1759
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	43%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1919
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	367
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	23%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	27%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	88%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1962
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	10%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	26%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2016
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	351
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	24%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2009
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	17%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2075
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	92%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1604
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	1733
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1727
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1928
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1983
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2040
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2019
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	330
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2067
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	334
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 10
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1644
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	374
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1694
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1777
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1900
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	362
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1968
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2023
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2017
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2072
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 153

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 421

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 697

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1550
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1719
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1681
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1922
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	349
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1995
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1999
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	334
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2026
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	331
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2080
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	328
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	313
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1613
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	368
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1721
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	361
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1699
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1897
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	362
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1992
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2014
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2020
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2087
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	348
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	153
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	653
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	77
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	144
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	664
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	79
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	146
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	673
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	77
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	409
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	705
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	87
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	419
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	715
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	88
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	363
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	713
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	84
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	9
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	12
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	771
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	709
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	75
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	690
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	720
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	77
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 143

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	338
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 359

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	312
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 58%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 736

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	324
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 65%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	2048
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	2047
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	1968
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 80

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	2049
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 13
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	2051
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	2036
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 15

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	2013
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	2014
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1955
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 59

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	2048
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	2049
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	2014
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 35

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 542

Mean Scale Score

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	724
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 85
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 526

Mean Scale Score

Here:	713
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 542

Mean Scale Score

Here:	738
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 87
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 11
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 10

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 527

Mean Scale Score

Here:	732
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 81
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 535

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

LAKE BRANTLEY HIGH SCHOOL:	320
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 86%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI