U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Lake Marion Creek Elementary School in Poinciana, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Poinciana, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23.

3055 LAKE MARION CREEK RD
Poinciana, FL 34759

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bok Academy School (12.6 miles):

83
Inwood Elementary School (16.0 miles):

60
Alta Vista Elementary School (8.2 miles):

48
Osceola High School (16.1 miles):

43
Gateway High School (17.9 miles):

33
Adolescent Residential Center School (13.9 miles):

25
Lake Marion Creek Elementary School:

23
Auburndale Central Elementary School (17.9 miles):

17
New Beginnings Education Complex School (18.3 miles):

0
Lake Marion Creek Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Osceola County:

33
Poinciana:

15
Lake Marion Creek Elementary:

23

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA



Poinciana, FL forum
Recent posts about schools in Poinciana, Florida on our local forum with over 1,500,000 registered users:
Schools in key West  (3 replies)
Coral Way restaurant of the 60s-70s  (33 replies)
Poinciana/Kissimmee should I move here  (164 replies)
Why does everyone say that Kissimmee area is not good?  (75 replies)
Poinciana Areas  (8 replies)
NYC to Tampa  (41 replies)

Latest news about schools in Poinciana, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations


Phone: (863) 427-1471 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1831
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 427-1303
Principal: Polly Bruno
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 65
Senate District: 15
School Web Address: http://schools.polk-fl.net/lmce

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 68 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 68 schools:

79%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 68 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 68 schools:

55%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 68 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 68 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 68 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

42%
State average from 68 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

465
State average from 68 schools:

549
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 68 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: NO

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 68 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 68 schools:

46%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 461 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 460 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 391
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 375

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 392
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 375
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 183

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 192
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 183
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 410 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 409 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 333

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 348
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 333
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 68 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 68 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 68 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 68 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 68 schools:

68%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 68 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 68 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 68 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

557
State average from 68 schools:

561
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 68 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 68 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

85%
State average from 68 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 260 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 260 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 65 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 65 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 65 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 65 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 65 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 65 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 65 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 65 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

473
State average from 65 schools:

536
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 65 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 65 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

85%
State average from 65 schools:

46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 281 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 232
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 233 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 60 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 60 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 60 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

14%
State average from 60 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 60 schools:

69%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 60 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 60 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 60 schools:

65%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

443
State average from 60 schools:

538
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 60 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 60 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 60 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 398 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 397 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 369 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 368 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 342
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 343
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 61 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 61 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 61 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

51%
State average from 61 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 61 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 61 schools:

64%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

360
State average from 61 schools:

421
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 61 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 61 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 61 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 425 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 423 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 118
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 399
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 398
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 389 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 387 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 107

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 365
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 364
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 314 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 85

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 294
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 294
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 59 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 59 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 59 schools:

85%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 59 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 59 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 59 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

365
State average from 59 schools:

418
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 59 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 59 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1214
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1523
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

49%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1550
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

27%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1406
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

20%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1544
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1586
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1598
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1312
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1439
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1543
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1720
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1870
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

307
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1437
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

330
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1475
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1563
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1669
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1751
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1865
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 83
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 205
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1156
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1380
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1464
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1671
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1739
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1845
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1226
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1388
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1468
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1679
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

311
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1778
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1850
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

111
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

608
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

39
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

98
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

91
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

56
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

140
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

671
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

226
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

228
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

59
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 92
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

280
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 232
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

281
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1110
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1366
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1391
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1273
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 119

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1446
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1476
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1414
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 62

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1315
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1419
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1441
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1340
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 101

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1578
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1595
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1463
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 132

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 144
Mean Scale Score
Here:

607
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 38
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 129
Mean Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

622
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 43
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 125
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 144
Mean Scale Score
Here:

612
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 51
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 129
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 57
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 124
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 126
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

281
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 83%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

Back to: Poinciana, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.