U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Lake Marion Creek Elementary School in Poinciana, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Poinciana, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23.

3055 LAKE MARION CREEK RD
Poinciana, FL 34759

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bok Academy School (12.6 miles):

83
Inwood Elementary School (16.0 miles):

60
Alta Vista Elementary School (8.2 miles):

48
Osceola High School (16.1 miles):

43
Gateway High School (17.9 miles):

33
Adolescent Residential Center School (13.9 miles):

25
Lake Marion Creek Elementary School:

23
Auburndale Central Elementary School (17.9 miles):

17
New Beginnings Education Complex School (18.3 miles):

0
Lake Marion Creek Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Osceola County:

33
Poinciana:

15
Lake Marion Creek Elementary:

23

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Poinciana, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations


Phone: (863) 427-1471 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1831
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 427-1303
Principal: Polly Bruno
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 65
Senate District: 15
School Web Address: http://schools.polk-fl.net/lmce

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 68 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 68 schools:

79%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 68 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 68 schools:

55%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 68 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 68 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 68 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

42%
State average from 68 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

465
State average from 68 schools:

549
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 68 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: NO

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 68 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 68 schools:

46%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 461 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 460 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 391
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 375

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 392
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 375
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 183

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 192
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 183
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 410 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 409 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 333

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 348
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 333
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 68 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 68 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 68 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 68 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 68 schools:

68%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 68 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 68 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 68 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

557
State average from 68 schools:

561
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 68 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 68 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

85%
State average from 68 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 260 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 260 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 65 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 65 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 65 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 65 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 65 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 65 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 65 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 65 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

473
State average from 65 schools:

536
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 65 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 65 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

85%
State average from 65 schools:

46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 281 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 232
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 233 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 60 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 60 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 60 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

14%
State average from 60 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 60 schools:

69%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 60 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 60 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 60 schools:

65%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

443
State average from 60 schools:

538
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 60 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 60 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 60 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 398 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 397 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 369 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 368 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 342
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 343
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 61 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 61 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 61 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

51%
State average from 61 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 61 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 61 schools:

64%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

360
State average from 61 schools:

421
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 61 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 61 schools:

55%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 61 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 425 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 423 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 118
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 399
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 398
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 389 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 387 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 107

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 365
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 364
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 314 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 85

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 294
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 294
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 59 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 59 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 59 schools:

85%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 59 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 59 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 59 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

365
State average from 59 schools:

418
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 59 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 59 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1214
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1523
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

49%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1550
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

27%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1406
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

20%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1544
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1586
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1598
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1312
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1439
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1543
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1720
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1870
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

307
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1437
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

330
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1475
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1563
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1669
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1751
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1865
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 83
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 205
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1156
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1380
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1464
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1671
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1739
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1845
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1226
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1388
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1468
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1679
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

311
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1778
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1850
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

111
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

608
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

39
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

98
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

91
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

56
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

140
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

671
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

226
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

228
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

59
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 92
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

280
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 232
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

281
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1110
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1366
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1391
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1273
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 119

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1446
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1476
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1414
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 62

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1315
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1419
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1441
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1340
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 101

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1578
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1595
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1463
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 132

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 144
Mean Scale Score
Here:

607
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 38
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 129
Mean Scale Score
LAKE MARION CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

622
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 43
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 125
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 144
Mean Scale Score
Here:

612
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 51
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 129
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 57
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 124
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 126
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

281
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 83%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

Back to: Poinciana, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.