Lake St. George Elementary School in Palm Harbor, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 38.

2855 COUNTY RD 95
Palm Harbor, FL 34684

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Tarpon Springs Fundamental Ele School (5.8 miles):

97
Bay Crest Elementary School (10.6 miles):

74
Largo Central Elementary School (10.1 miles):

62
Tarpon Springs Elementary School (6.6 miles):

53
Trinity For Children - Lower Division School (15.8 miles):

41
Lake St. George Elementary School:

38
Village Of Excellence Academy School (19.6 miles):

30
Robles Elementary School (19.9 miles):

19
Lake St. George Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
Palm Harbor:

66
Lake St. George Elementary School:

38

1
Report this comment as inappropriate
Oct 11, 2012 @ 7:07 am
Does this school have a junior Robatics club. If so what days and times does it meet.

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 669-1161 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 6281
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 669-1165
Principal: Diane Cato
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 48
Senate District: 11
School Web Address: http://www.lsg-es.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

86%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

62%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

573
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 257 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

86%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

49%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

561
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 288 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 286 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 275
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 205

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

48%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

554
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

24%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 279 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 289
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 272
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 213
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

24%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

10%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

51%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

439
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 656 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 653 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 255
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 617
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 615
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 561 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 217
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 532
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 530
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 469 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 467 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 168
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 435
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (81%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

27%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

43%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

364
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 890 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 891 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 286
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 852
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 855
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 767 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 768 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 252

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 733
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 736
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 103
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 103
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 679 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 680 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 220

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 655
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 658
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 37
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 130
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 130
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 48

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 133
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

17%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

30%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

327
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1503
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

333
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1693
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1723
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

323
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

27%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1440
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1640
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

285
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1740
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

55%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1575
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1662
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1746
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1480
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

282
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1784
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

28%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1550
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1694
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1633
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1519
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1576
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1775
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1814
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1647
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

375
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1639
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

335
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1550
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1678
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1823
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1907
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 94
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 176
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1492
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1630
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1720
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1472
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1608
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1723
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1766
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

257
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1558
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1580
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1732
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1535
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1725
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1821
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1891
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

292
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

95
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

646
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

95
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

104
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

82
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

104
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

639
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

33
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

174
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

656
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

44
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

165
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

661
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

39
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

168
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

41
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 96
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

304
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 166
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

242
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 12%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1658
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1668
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1582
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 86

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1679
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1689
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1617
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1731
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1744
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1670
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 74

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

247
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1747
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1758
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1568
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 189

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1798
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1822
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1729
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 93

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1862
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1870
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LAKE ST. GEORGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1769
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 101

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 163
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 239
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 40
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 225
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 163
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 239
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 223
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 239
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

239
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 14%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 74%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2019 Advameg, Inc.