Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Lake Travis Elementary School in Austin, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45
Address
 15303 KOLLMEYER
Austin, TX 78734
Telephone
(512) 533-6300
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
45
Students
888
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
61.0
Free lunch eligible students
348
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
55
School district
LAKE TRAVIS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
HUDSON BEND MIDDLE (1.5 miles):

99
RIVER RIDGE EL (2.4 miles):

99
CANYON RIDGE MIDDLE (2.5 miles):

99
LAURA WELCH BUSH EL (2.7 miles):

99
STEINER RANCH EL (3.7 miles):

98
SERENE HILLS EL (3.7 miles):

96
LAKEWAY EL (2.2 miles):

94
LAKE TRAVIS H S (3.3 miles):

90
Lake Travis Elementary School:

45
Lake Travis Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Travis County:

57
Austin:

57
Lake Travis Elementary School:

45

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 888
Enrollment in 2015: 888
Enrollment in 2014: 950
Enrollment in 2013: 910
Enrollment in 2012: 878
Enrollment in 2011: 826
Enrollment in 2010: 761
Enrollment in 2009: 666
Enrollment in 2008: 756
Enrollment in 2007: 704
Enrollment in 2006: 671
Enrollment in 2003: 676
Enrollment in 2002: 697
Enrollment in 2001: 674
Enrollment in 2000: 625
Enrollment in 1999: 923

Lake Travis Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students102127153124127129126888
Female students46577155626165417
Male students56708269656861471
American Indian/Alaska Native students1 - - - - - 12
Asian students2222 - 1413
Hispanic students68656558646554439
Black students31 - - 13 - 8
White students27577958615763402
Two or More Races students127613424

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 102
Kindergarten enrollment: 127
1st grade enrollment: 153
2nd grade enrollment: 124
3rd grade enrollment: 127
4th grade enrollment: 129
5th grade enrollment: 126

Lake Travis Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 417 (47.0%)
Lake Travis Elementary School:

47.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 471 (53.0%)
Lake Travis Elementary School:

53.0%
Texas:

50.1%

Lake Travis Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 13 (1.5%)
School:

1.5%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 439 (49.4%)
Here:

49.4%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 8 (0.9%)
Lake Travis Elementary School:

0.9%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 402 (45.3%)
School:

45.3%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 24 (2.7%)
Lake Travis Elementary School:

2.7%
Texas:

2.1%

Lake Travis Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 403 (45.4%)
Lake Travis Elementary School:

45.4%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 348 (39.2%)
Lake Travis Elementary School:

39.2%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 55 (6.2%)
Lake Travis Elementary School:

6.2%
State:

6.2%

Lake Travis Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 61

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 1
Number of FTE psychologists: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

14.6
Texas:

15.6

Lake Travis Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,735,382
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 61 (Salary Expenditures: $2,970,327)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.1 (Salary Expenditures: $294,570)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $326,308)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $144,177)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $136,427
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $827,305
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,161,872
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12.1 (Salary Expenditures: $356,819)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $326,309)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $144,177)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $181,236

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic292
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White4
  • IDEA28
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 304 (male: 154, female: 150)
  • Hispanic: 292 (male: 146, female: 146)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 28 (male: 20, female: 8)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 73 (male: 53, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 47 (male: 34, female: 13)
  • White: 26 (male: 19, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 29 (male: 22, female: 7)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic7
  • Black2
  • White25
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 36 (male: 29, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 25 (male: 20, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Lake Travis Elementary School:

1.3%
State:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Lake Travis Elementary School:

3.1%
Texas:

4.1%

Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Lake Travis Elementary School:

1.6%
Texas:

3.6%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic16
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • White40
  • Multirace4
  • LEP10
  • IDEA4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 64 (male: 32, female: 32)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 40 (male: 20, female: 20)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Lake Travis Elementary School:

72.1
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,457
  • Males1,473
  • Females1,441
  • Hispanic1,391
  • Asian1,520
  • White1,499
  • Multirace1,558
Math Average Scale Score:

1,457
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 157
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 159

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

30%
27%
22%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,473, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 26%)
26%
22%
26%
26%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,441, Tested: 76, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 16%)
34%
33%
17%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,391, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 9%)
48%
31%
12%
9%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
20%
20%
20%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,499, Tested: 78, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 27%)
18%
24%
31%
27%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,558, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 50%)
33%
17%
50%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,461
  • Males1,450
  • Females1,477
  • Hispanic1,370
  • Asian1,443
  • White1,479
  • Multirace1,538
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,461
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 109
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 111

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

18%
26%
28%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,450, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 24%)
21%
23%
32%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 35%)
15%
28%
22%
35%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,370, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 22%)
44%
23%
11%
22%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,443, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,479, Tested: 78, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 29%)
13%
28%
30%
29%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
33%
34%
33%

3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,389
  • Males1,341
  • Females1,420
  • Hispanic1,389
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,389
State:

956
Reading students tested: 49
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.6 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

31%
38%
13%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,341, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 5%)
37%
47%
11%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,420, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 27%)
27%
33%
13%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,389, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 18%)
31%
38%
13%
18%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,592
  • Males1,592
  • Females1,593
  • Hispanic1,524
  • White1,655
Math Average Scale Score:

1,592
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 137
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 137

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 38%

21%
22%
19%
38%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 76, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 41%)
20%
19%
20%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 34%)
23%
25%
18%
34%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 20%)
31%
28%
21%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 54%)
11%
19%
16%
54%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,575
  • Males1,542
  • Females1,619
  • Hispanic1,500
  • White1,604
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,575
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 100
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 100

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.2 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 11%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

20%
11%
28%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,542, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 32%)
23%
14%
31%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 52%)
16%
7%
25%
52%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,500, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 27%)
33%
12%
28%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 43%)
15%
11%
31%
43%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,966
  • Males3,875
  • Females4,079
  • Hispanic3,622
  • White4,067
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,966
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 99
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 100

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.5 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

23%
22%
34%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,875, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 20%)
27%
22%
31%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,079, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 23%)
18%
23%
36%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,622, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 9%)
31%
31%
29%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,067, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 25%)
21%
18%
36%
25%

4th Grade (Spanish)

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,393
  • Males1,380
  • Females1,407
  • Hispanic1,393
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,393
Texas:

815
Reading students tested: 37
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.2 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

51%
30%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,380, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
55%
25%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,407, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
47%
35%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,393, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 0%)
51%
30%
19%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,369
  • Males3,405
  • Females3,327
  • Hispanic3,369
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,369
Texas:

2,017
Writing students tested: 37
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (40%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 62%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

62%
19%
14%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,405, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 5%)
60%
10%
25%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,327, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 65%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 6%)
65%
29%
6%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,369, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 62%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 5%)
62%
19%
14%
5%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,662
  • Males1,674
  • Females1,648
  • Hispanic1,631
  • White1,686
Math Average Scale Score:

1,662
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 124
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 126

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 37%

10%
25%
28%
37%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,674, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 41%)
9%
20%
30%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 33%)
12%
31%
24%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 27%)
16%
34%
23%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,686, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 46%)
4%
17%
33%
46%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,647
  • Males1,654
  • Females1,638
  • Hispanic1,621
  • White1,665
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,647
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 114
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 114

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.7 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 49%

6%
20%
25%
49%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 52%)
8%
18%
22%
52%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 46%)
4%
23%
27%
46%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 40%)
10%
26%
24%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,665, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 56%)
3%
16%
25%
56%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,990
  • Males4,030
  • Females3,944
  • Hispanic3,786
  • White4,170
Science Average Scale Score:

3,990
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 125
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 126

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.3 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

16%
34%
26%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,030, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 30%)
13%
33%
24%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,944, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 17%)
19%
36%
28%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,786, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 11%)
26%
41%
22%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,170, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 34%)
7%
27%
32%
34%

5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 3
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,490
  • Males1,469
  • Females1,509
  • Hispanic1,490
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,490
Texas:

683
Reading students tested: 15
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 15

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (47%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 60%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 6%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

27%
60%
6%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,469, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 86%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
14%
86%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,509, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 13%)
38%
38%
12%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,490, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 7%)
27%
60%
6%
7%

Science students tested: 3
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


6th Grade
Math students tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic37
  • Black2
  • White31
  • Multirace5
  • LEP25
  • IDEA7
  • 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 75 (male: 38, female: 37)
  • Hispanic: 37 (male: 20, female: 17)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 31 (male: 11, female: 20)
  • Two or More Races: 5 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

84.5
State:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

2.3
Texas:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic3
  • White3
  • LEP1
  • IDEA1
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 3 (all male)
  • White: 3 (male: 1, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 1 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 1 (all male)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (All preschool students): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (All preschool students)
School:

1.1
State:

1.4

Preschool children receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Austin, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2020 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents