Lakeside Academy School in Belle Glade, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 12.

716 S MAIN ST
Belle Glade, FL 33430

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Clewiston Adult School (16.8 miles):

64
Clewiston Middle School (17.5 miles):

39
Pahokee Elementary School (10.3 miles):

36
Westside Elementary School (16.9 miles):

33
K Cunningham/Canal Point Elementary School (12.9 miles):

26
Eagle Youth Academy School (3.5 miles):

17
Lakeside Academy School:

12
Belle Glade Elementary School (0.6 miles):

10
Lakeside Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Belle Glade:

25
Lakeside Academy School:

12

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 993-5000 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 2641
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 993-5001
Principal: Barbara Litinski
Regular charter school.
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 24 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 24 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 24 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

26%
State average from 24 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 24 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 24 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

42%
State average from 24 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 24 schools:

68%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

443
State average from 24 schools:

548
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 24 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 24 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 24 schools:

40%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 925 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 920 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 435
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 869
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 793

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 862
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 788
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 652 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 650 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 308
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 620
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 561

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 615
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 555
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 424 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 422 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 179
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 365

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 383
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 361
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 24 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

65%
State average from 23 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 23 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 23 schools:

55%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

42%
State average from 23 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 23 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 24 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 23 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

442
State average from 23 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

96%
State average from 23 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

38%
State average from 23 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 23 schools:

40%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1006 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 997 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 503
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 959
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 890

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 952
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 886
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 704 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 697 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 348
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 681
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 620

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 674
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 617
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 396 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 392 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 189
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 371
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 358

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 356
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

38%
State average from 21 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 21 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 21 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

24%
State average from 21 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 21 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 21 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 21 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

58%
State average from 21 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

417
State average from 21 schools:

530
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 21 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

37%
State average from 21 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

31%
State average from 21 schools:

41%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1110 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1106 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 520
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1057
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 989

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1052
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 984
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 764 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 763 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 353
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 730
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 679

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 729
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 677
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 451 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 450 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 193
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 425
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 399

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 424
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 398
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

51%
State average from 18 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 18 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 18 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

55%
State average from 18 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 18 schools:

74%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 18 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

74%
State average from 18 schools:

71%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 18 schools:

63%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

532
State average from 18 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 18 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

97%
State average from 18 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 18 schools:

38%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1110
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

1360
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1266
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

36%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

9%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1388
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

27%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1928
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

35%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1909
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

52%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

31%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

4
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1002
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

73%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1179
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

75%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1146
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

73%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1516
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

45%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

45%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1927
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

60%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1980
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

78%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1343
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

1183
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 08%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 06
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 01

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1483
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1923
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1894
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1256
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1161
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1366
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1931
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1972
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 8
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 510
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1007
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1182
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1215
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

232
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1814
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1887
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1884
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

216
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1125
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1175
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

1246
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1605
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1909
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1934
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

573
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

14
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

15
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

617
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

38
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

18
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

624
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

32
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

19
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

501
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

466
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

52
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 21
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

289
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 67%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 528
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

286
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1253
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1276
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1265
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1092
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 174

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1547
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1593
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1391
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 202

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1476
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1476
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1368
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 108

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1225
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 59%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1351
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1342
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1077
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 265

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1567
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

1588
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1242
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 347

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1448
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1448
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1377
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 70

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

597
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 30
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 23
Mean Scale Score
Here:

602
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 26
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 49
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 22
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

602
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 44
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 23
Mean Scale Score
Here:

598
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 32
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

621
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 36
Number Sense (max 12): 6
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
LAKESIDE ACADEMY:

629
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 26
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

286
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 70%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 96%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Belle Glade, FL
  5. Lakeside Academy School in Belle Glade, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.