Lamar Louise Curry Middle School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 73.

15750 SW 47 ST
Miami, FL 33185

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (8.5 miles):

98
Coral Way K-8 Center School (14.7 miles):

75
Lamar Louise Curry Middle School:

73
Young Womens Preparatory Academy School (15.1 miles):

64
Centennial Middle School (12.6 miles):

47
Howard A. Doolin Middle School (1.2 miles):

33
Hialeah Middle School (15.7 miles):

19
Downtown Miami Charter School (16.0 miles):

7
Lamar Louise Curry Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Lamar Louise Curry Middle School:

73

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 222-2775 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6921
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 229-1521
Magnet Program.
Principal: Wandarece Ruan
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 120
Senate District: 38
School Web Address: http://curry.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

83%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

57%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

610
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

60%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1269 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1267 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 556
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1218
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1193

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1216
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1174
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1113 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1111 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 490
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1071
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1050

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1069
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1030
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 761 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 760 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 319
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 723
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 709

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 722
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 692
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

632
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1476 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1476 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 562
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1413
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1389

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1396
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1372
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1276 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1276 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 487
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1223
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1204

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1205
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1186
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 775 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 775 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 292
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 728
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 721

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 714
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 707
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

54%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

608
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1670 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1670 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 558
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1631
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1595

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1630
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1592
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1449 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1449 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 482
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1413
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1385

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1412
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1382
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 851 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 851 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 283
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 829
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 808

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 829
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 806
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

51%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

579
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1672 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1670 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 526
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1624
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1622
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1453 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1451 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 459
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1416
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1414
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 813 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 811 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 254
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 787
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 785
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

466
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1509 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1508 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 409
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1456
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1454
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 106
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 105
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1320 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1319 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 360

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1276
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1275
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 733 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 733 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 210

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 700
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 700
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 46
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 143
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 143
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

418
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1836
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1982
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1994
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1821
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1950
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1969
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1878
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1910
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1994
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1847
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1915
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1982
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 571
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1797
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1937
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

342
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1947
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1781
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1940
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1972
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

549
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

75
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

562
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

567
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

701
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 569
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

330
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 66%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 12%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1791
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1807
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1742
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 65

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1883
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1889
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1796
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 93

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1920
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1928
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1840
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 89

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1764
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

331
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1775
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1734
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 41

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1880
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1884
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1753
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 132

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1947
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1952
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1853
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 99

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 566
Mean Scale Score
LAMAR LOUISE CURRY MIDDLE SCHOOL:

685
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 76
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 563
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 540
Mean Scale Score
Here:

701
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 76
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 566
Mean Scale Score
Here:

681
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 563
Mean Scale Score
Here:

702
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 540
Mean Scale Score
Here:

713
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 539
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

303
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 91%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2020 Advameg, Inc.