Lanier-James Education Center School in Hallandale, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 4.

1050 NW 7TH COURT
Hallandale, FL 33009

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Imagine Charter At Weston School (18.9 miles):

98
North Twin Lakes Elementary School (10.9 miles):

77
Lillie C. Evans Elementary School (11.1 miles):

60
Oakridge Elementary School (2.1 miles):

50
Coconut Grove Elementary School (19.0 miles):

40
Flagami Elementary School (18.8 miles):

32
Hubert O. Sibley Elementary School (8.2 miles):

17
Lanier-James Education Center School:

4
Lanier-James Education Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Broward County:

47
Hallandale:

9
Lanier-James Education Center:

4

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (754) 321-7350 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 405
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: BROWARD
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Residential
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 321-7390
Principal: Kelvin S Lee
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 105
Senate District: 31

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (81%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (70%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (68%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 27%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 32%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 70%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 42%

Making Reading Gains: 47%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains: 61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 67%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 70%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 416

Percent Tested: 89%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 56%

Minority Rate: 70%


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (81%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (75%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (84%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (84%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (83%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 27%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 28%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 77%

Making Reading Gains: 58%

Making Math Gains: 63%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 80%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 333

Percent Tested: 86%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 64%

Minority Rate: 74%


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (88%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 119
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 120
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (86%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (91%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 62
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 61
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (83%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (83%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (91%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 85
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (87%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 15%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 26%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 63%

Making Reading Gains: 42%

Making Math Gains: 49%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 248

Percent Tested: 94%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 53%

Minority Rate: 75%


Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1509
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

19%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1655
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

56%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1899
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

36%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

36%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

43%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1593
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

32%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

63%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

11%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

67%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1582
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

71%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1687
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

268
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

47%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1906
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

31%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

54%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1811
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

53%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

32%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1308
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1462
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1713
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1610
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1652
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

249
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1433
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1564
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1703
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1857
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1153
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

1461
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1636
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1778
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1687
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1691
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1403
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1516
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1750
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

296
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1808
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1746
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

621
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

30
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

29
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

637
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

31
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

34
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

660
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

47
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

39
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

49
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

11
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

34
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

681
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

39
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 32
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

257
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 66%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

244
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 18%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

806
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

187
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 1
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

698
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

847
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -149

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1228
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

235
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1286
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1170
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 116

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1354
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

247
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1354
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1287
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1623
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1637
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1563
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 75

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1581
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1572
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1527
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 44

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1752
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 52%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1599
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1719
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -120

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

1609
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 59%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1641
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1771
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -130

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

229
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1381
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1349
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1215
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 134

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1448
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1452
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1365
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 87

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1677
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1706
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

1531
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 175

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1669
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1714
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1642
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1715
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 48%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

1675
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1753
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -78

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1813
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 59%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1800
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

1844
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -44

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Median NPR: 18
Literary (max 18): 6
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

619
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 28
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 27
Mean Scale Score
Here:

638
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 40
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 36
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 31
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 34
Mean Scale Score
Here:

659
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 29
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 29
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

619
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 33
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 27
Mean Scale Score
Here:

635
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 30
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 40
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 56
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 36
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 44
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 34
Mean Scale Score
LANIER-JAMES EDUCATION CENTER:

677
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 39
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 27
Mean Scale Score
Here:

681
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 26
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 35
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

237
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 23%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 54%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 49%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

242
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 22%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 52%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 30%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.